Cisc vs risc

CISC vs RISC
The simplest way to examine the advantages and disadvantages of RISC
architecture is by contrasting it with it's predecessor: CISC (Complex Instruction
Set Computers) architecture.
Multiplying Two Numbers in Memory
On the right is a diagram representing the
storage scheme for a generic computer. The
main memory is divided into locations
numbered from (row) 1: (column) 1 to (row)
6: (column) 4. The execution unit is
responsible

for

carrying

out

all

computations. However, the execution unit
can only operate on data that has been
loaded into one of the six registers (A, B, C,
D, E, or F). Let's say we want to find the
product of two numbers - one stored in location 2:3 and another stored in
location 5:2 - and then store the product back in the location 2:3.
The CISC Approach
The primary goal of CISC architecture is to complete a task in as few lines of
assembly as possible. This is achieved by building processor hardware that is
capable of understanding and executing a series of operations. For this particular
task, a CISC processor would come prepared with a specific instruction (we'll call it

"MULT"). When executed, this instruction loads the two values into separate
registers, multiplies the operands in the execution unit, and then stores the
product in the appropriate register. Thus, the entire task of multiplying two
numbers can be completed with one instruction:
MULT 2:3, 5:2
MULT is what is known as a "complex instruction." It operates directly on the
computer's memory banks and does not require the programmer to explicitly call
any loading or storing functions. It closely resembles a command in a higher level
language. For instance, if we let "a" represent the value of 2:3 and "b" represent
the value of 5:2, then this command is identical to the C statement "a = a * b."
One of the primary advantages of this system is that the compiler has to do very
little work to translate a high-level language statement into assembly. Because
the length of the code is relatively short, very little RAM is required to store
instructions. The emphasis is put on building complex instructions directly into
the hardware.
The RISC Approach
RISC processors only use simple instructions that can be executed within one
clock cycle. Thus, the "MULT" command described above could be divided into
three separate commands: "LOAD," which moves data from the memory bank to
a register, "PROD," which finds the product of two operands located within the
registers, and "STORE," which moves data from a register to the memory banks.

In order to perform the exact series of steps described in the CISC approach, a
programmer would need to code four lines of assembly:
LOAD A, 2:3
LOAD B, 5:2
PROD A, B
STORE 2:3, A
At first, this may seem like a much less efficient way of completing the operation.
Because there are more lines of code, more RAM is needed to store the assembly
level instructions. The compiler must also perform more work to convert a highlevel language statement into code of this form.
However, the RISC strategy also brings some very important advantages. Because
each instruction requires only one clock cycle to execute, the entire program will
execute in approximately the same amount of time as the multi-cycle "MULT"
command. These RISC "reduced instructions" require less transistors of hardware
space than the complex instructions, leaving more room for general purpose
registers. Because all of the instructions execute in a uniform amount of time (i.e.
one clock), pipelining is possible.
Separating the "LOAD" and "STORE" instructions actually reduces the amount of
work that the computer must perform. After a CISC-style "MULT" command is
executed, the processor automatically erases the registers. If one of the operands
needs to be used for another computation, the processor must re-load the data
from the memory bank into a register. In RISC, the operand will remain in the
register until another value is loaded in its place.

The Performance Equation
The following equation is commonly used for expressing a computer's
performance ability:

The CISC approach attempts to minimize the number of instructions per program,
sacrificing the number of cycles per instruction. RISC does the opposite, reducing
the cycles per instruction at the cost of the number of instructions per program.

CISC

RISC

Emphasis on hardware

Emphasis on software

Includes multi-clock

Single-clock,

complex instructions

reduced instruction only

Memory-to-memory:

Register to register:

"LOAD" and "STORE"

"LOAD" and "STORE"

incorporated in instructions

are independent instructions

Small code sizes,

Low cycles per second,

high cycles per second

large code sizes

Transistors used for storing

Spends more transistors

complex instructions

on memory registers

Cisc vs risc

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Cisc vs risc (20)

More from Kumar (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Cisc vs risc