Outread

Not all startup founders are built the same and that’s good. A groundbreaking study of 21,000+ startups revealed that success isn’t just about the product or timing… it’s also about the people leading it. Specifically, the combination of personalities on the founding team. The FOALED framework breaks down 6 distinct founder types: 🔹 Fighters 🔹 Operators 🔹 Accomplishers 🔹 Leaders 🔹 Engineers 🔹 Developers Teams with 3 or more diverse personalities were twice as likely to succeed. Curious which one you are? Or which type you might be missing from your team? Swipe through to find out and tag a co-founder who balances you out. 👇 Anshika Janhvi Dhruv Alex #startup #leadership #founders #startupsuccess #entrepreneurship #FOALED #teamdynamics #vc #personalitytypes #founderfit #startuplife #Outread #researchbacked #teamwork #founderinsight #businesspsychology

How to get the summary from the MOST relevant papers? This tool doesn't just find papers - it ranks them by actual relevance to your question. I tested this last week while preparing a proposal on gut-brain connections. What I got wasn't a dump of 5,000+ results. Instead: —  Papers with a relevance score showing exact match to my query —  Summaries of just the most critical findings Want to try? Here's how: — Sign up to Outread(dot)ai (try for free here: https://lnkd.in/gqVvAjSX) — Click on Darwin AI — Type your research question — Choose complexity level — Review papers ranked by relevance — Get individual insights from top results 𝘗𝘚. 𝘙𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘴𝘺𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘣𝘪𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴𝘯'𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴 --------------------------------------- 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥? 1. Save the post with 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘦.𝘮𝘦 2. 🔄 Repost to help your network 3. Follow Razia to get useful Research content (no clickbait stuff!) in your feed. Want FREE tips on using AI in research? ↳ Join 12K+ researchers here ⬇️ 🔗 below my name --------------------------------------- #aiinresearch

Are Diverse Minds Wiser Together? 🤔 One of the best parts of building a research-focused startup like Outread is reading insights that challenge how we think about collaboration and decision-making. I go through a lot of research summaries on our app, and I’ve decided to start sharing some of my personal favourites here on LinkedIn. This one really stood out: Would you make better decisions with your identical twin or a random stranger? Surprisingly, you’d be better off with the stranger! Here’s why: Identical twins, who share nearly 100% of their DNA, tend to make similar judgment errors. Genetically diverse pairs make different types of errors that cancel each other out, resulting in smarter collective decisions. The study tested this by asking over 600 twins to guess the number of candies in jars. Strangers consistently outperformed identical twins, proving that diverse thinking patterns improve group wisdom. This has fascinating implications for teams in business, medicine, and government. Diversity—whether genetic, cultural, or experiential—creates a kind of cognitive ecosystem where different perspectives complement each other, leading to better outcomes. For me, this underscores a bigger truth: our differences are our greatest strength when solving complex problems. 🧩 You can find the full paper on Elsevier or read the Outread Summary here: https://lnkd.in/gQH-2gV7, which I’ve made free for this week. 💡 What do you think? Does diversity drive better decisions, or are there times when similarity has its advantages? Let me know in the comments! 🚀 #Diversity #DecisionMaking #Innovation #StartupLife #ResearchInsights

4 weeks ago, we launched a new tool on Outread. It caught wildfire—thousands of users engaged with it in just a few short days, generating an incredible buzz. But we faced a challenge: this tool was being confused with our existing 'search' functionality. Here’s the distinction: 👉 The 'search' functionality allows you to explore our curated library of research summaries. 👉 The new tool, however, goes beyond—letting users search a database of 200M research papers and delivering research-backed answers to their questions. To resolve this confusion and give the tool an identity of its own, we renamed it DarwinAI by Outread. By naming it, we’ve given it room to evolve—potentially into a flagship feature. With DarwinAI, you can explore a vast universe of knowledge, unearth new insights, and get precise answers backed by research. It's already being used by thousands of researchers worldwide to simplify their literature reviews and fuel their discoveries. Not every feature deserves a name. But sometimes, introducing a unique identity is what sparks clarity. 👉 Explore DarwinAI by Outread here: https://lnkd.in/gW6MEsKx

PhD Students – How to identify PERFECT papers for your literature review in 10 minutes? Identify relevant papers is quite challenging. It takes a lot of time and effort. Automate this process using DarwinAI by Outread. Here is how it works. 1. Go to outread.ai and log in. 2. Click on 𝐷𝑎𝑟𝑤𝑖𝑛𝐴𝐼 at the top right. 3. Enter your search term or question. 4. Choose complexity level – simple or informative. 5. Then click the 𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ button. 6. DarwinAI will search over 200M research papers. 7. Then, it will give you an answer with a list of papers. 8. You can check each paper by clicking on it. 9. You will also see the 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 of each paper. 10. You can select papers with highest scores for your review. 11. This way you will end up with a list of perfect papers for your review. You can also use DarwinAI to get science back answers. If you have any questions, just ask DarwinAI. It will answer it with references. You will see each statement supported by studies. Try DarwinAI by Outread: www.outread.ai #literature #review #phd

What makes consciousness so elusive? There are two types of problems in understanding it: - Easy problems explain functions like processing stimuli or reporting mental states—handled by neuroscience. - The hard problem is explaining subjective experience—what it feels like to be conscious. Standard science can’t bridge the gap between brain processes and raw sensations. A solution? Treat consciousness as fundamental, like space or mass in physics. Emerging theories suggest a connection between information processing and experience, where physical systems that process information also create subjective feelings. This approach, while speculative, offers a promising bridge between the objective and subjective—taking the hard problem seriously. Read more 👉 https://lnkd.in/g9-PGBjY

In 2024, researchers linked screen time and physical activity to gut health in a groundbreaking study using genetic data. Each additional 1.9 hours of screen time raises the risk of 16 gut issues, like acid reflux and appendicitis, by 20-60%. On the flip side, moderate-to-vigorous exercise cuts the risk of eight digestive diseases by up to 50%. The study also found that BMI and Type 2 diabetes partly explain these effects, highlighting the complex relationship between lifestyle, weight, and gut health. The takeaway? Move more, sit less—small changes can make a big impact on your digestive health. Read more 👉 https://lnkd.in/gJm3ngkf

In a fascinating experiment, researchers discovered that exposing old mice to young blood could rejuvenate their aging hearts. By surgically connecting young and old mice in a process called parabiosis, they found that the enlarged hearts of old mice shrank back to a youthful size in just 4 weeks. The secret? A protein called GDF11, abundant in young blood but scarce in older animals. Further studies revealed that restoring GDF11 levels in old mice reversed age-related heart enlargement, showing the potential of this protein for future therapies. This discovery has exciting implications for human heart health and aging research. Could young blood be the key to a younger heart? 🩸 Find out more here: https://lnkd.in/gmURSEvC

In 2024, a groundbreaking study revealed how scientific literature can be transformed into interconnected knowledge graphs. The researchers developed a method to convert raw data into concise summaries and structured "graph triples" of concepts and relationships. These graphs were then merged into a global knowledge graph, showcasing a robust, scale-free network with a power-law exponent of 2.88. They demonstrated how this graph could uncover hidden relationships between ideas, like linking biology to music, and even generate novel hypotheses through graph traversal and path analysis. The study also explored creative applications by combining art and science, using abstract paintings to inspire the design of innovative, sustainable materials. Read more on Outread: https://lnkd.in/g6GThGfN

This is our FINAL launch of the year — and it's a game-changer. 🚀 Introducing **Q&A by Outread**: your personal gateway to science-backed answers, launching exclusively for our LinkedIn community before it becomes public. With Q&A, you can explore 200M research papers to surface relevant, reliable insights in seconds. No misinformation. No wasted time. Just answers you can trust. Here’s how it works: ✅ Ask a question. ✅ Instantly get a concise summary that pulls from the most relevant research. ✅ Dive deeper with insights from the 15 most relevant papers and their relevance scores. ✅ Want more? Click "View Papers" to explore the full text. Why settle for outdated search engines or unverified information? With Outread, you’ll find reliable answers faster than ever. Try it for free today! Click here to start exploring - https://lnkd.in/gmqyFEse