Functional dependancy
Download as pptx, pdf3 likes3,880 views
This document discusses database normalization forms and dependencies. It covers: - The two levels of discussing relation schema quality (logical and implementation) - Informal measures of quality like semantics, redundancy, NULL values, and spurious tuples - Functional dependencies, inference rules, closure, and finding a minimal cover - First, second, third, and BCNF normal forms and their definitions/conditions - Non-prime and prime attributes - Other dependencies like multivalued, join, and their relationships to higher normal forms.
More Related Content
What's hot (20)
Similar to Functional dependancy (20)
More from Visakh V (14)
Recently uploaded (20)
Functional dependancy
- 2. There are two levels at which we discuss the goodness of relation schema •Logical (or Conceptual)Level •Implementation (or storage ) Level
- 4. 4 Informal measures of quality for relation schemas are I. Semantics of the attribute • interpretation of attribute values from tuples II. Reducing redundant information in tuples • minimize the storage space used by the base relation • Problem of update anomalies • Insertion of anomalies • Deletion of anomalies • Modification of anomalies
- 5. iii. Reducing the NULL values in the tuples • Waste space at storage levels • Also lead to problems with understanding the meaning of attributes (ex:count,join ) iv. Disallowing the possibility of generating spurious tuples • Seems to be genuine but it is false
- 9. • Most important concept in relational schema design theory. • A functional dependency is a constraint between two set of attributes from the database. • it is denoted by X Y(functional dependency from x to y or y is functionally dependent on X.) • i.e. Y component of a tuple in r depend on , or are determined by , the values of the Y component. •A functional dependency is a property of the of the semantics or meaning .
- 11. Inference ??? •Dept_no Mgr_SSN , each department has one manager • Mgr_SSN Mgr_phone : Each manage has a unique phone number • then we can infer Dept_no Mgr_phone
- 12. closure ??? Closure : includes all dependencies that can be inferred from the given set F, it is denoted by F+ Let us see some example on board
- 13. To determine a systematic way to infer dependencies, we use inference rules that can be used to infer new dependencies The notation F XY means the functional dependency XY is inferred from functional dependencies F.
- 14. Trivial otherwise Inference rules for functional dependencies are : Non-Trivial • IR1 (reflexive rule) : If Y subset-of X, then X Y •IR2 (augmentation rule) : If X -> Y, then XZ -> YZ •IR3 (transitive rule) :If X Y & Y Z, then XZ •IR4 (decomposition ,or projective rule) : If X YZ then X Y •IR5 (Union or additive rule) : If XY,XZ then XYZ •IR6 (pseudo transitive rule) : If XY,WYZ then WX Z
- 15. Inference rules IR1 through IR3 are sound and complete Dependency that we can infer from F by using IR1 to IR3 holds every relation state r of R that satisfies the dependencies in F. Using IR1to IR3 repeatedly to infer dependencies until no more dependencies can be inferred from F The closure of F , can be determined from F by using inference rules IR1 to IR3 are known as Armstrong ‘s inference rules.
- 17. Cover : A set of functional dependencies F is said to cover another set of dependencies E if every FD in E is also in F +. Or we can say that E is covered by F. Two sets of functional dependencies E and F are equivalent if E += F + .
- 19. Minimal cover : minimal cover of a functional dependencies E is a set functional dependencies F that satisfies the property that every dependency in E is in the closure of F+ of F. •Every set of FDs has an equivalent minimal set •There can be several equivalent minimal sets •There is no simple algorithm for computing a minimal set of FDs that is equivalent to a set F of FDs •To synthesize a set of relations, we assume that we start with a set of dependencies that is a minimal set
- 20. Algorithm Finding a Minimal cover F for a set of functional dependencies E • Set F:= E • Replace each functional dependencies X{A1,A2,. . . .,An} in F by the n functional dependencies X A1,XA2,. .. .,XAn. • For each functional dependencies X A in For each attribute B that is an element of X • if {F – {XA}} U {(x-{B}) a} } CANONICAL form
- 21. Find minimum cover for E {B A, DA,ABD} Find minimum cover for E {AD,BCA,BCD,CB,EA,ED} Find minimum cover for E { AB -> C, C -> A, BC -> D, ACD -> B, D -> E, D -> G, BE -> C, CG -> B, CG -> D, CE -> A, CE -> G}
- 22. Find minimum cover for E {noname noage no,nameage noage,name}
- 25. •First proposed by Codd (1972) •Initially proposed first ,second and 3NF • later Boyce and Codd proposed BCNF • later 4th and 5th NF are proposed based on the concept of multivalued dependency and join dependencies
- 26. Advantages •Minimizing redundancy •Minimizing insertion , deletion, and modification of anomalies Normal form a relation refers to the highest normal form condition that it meets, and hence indicate the degree to which it has been normalized
- 27. Non-prime attribute A non-prime attribute is an attribute that does not occur in any candidate key. Employee Address would be a non-prime attribute in the "Employees' Skills" table. Prime attribute A prime attribute, conversely, is an attribute that does occur in some candidate key.
- 29. •Disallow multi valued attributes and composite attributes • it states that domain of an attributes must include only atomic (simple, indivisible)values. •Ex: address
- 31. Partial key
- 32. Must be in 1NF
- 33. Full functional dependency : A functional dependency X Y is a FULL FUNCTIONAL dependency if removal of any attribute A from X means that dependency does not hold any more; Partial dependency : A functional dependency X Y is a partial dependency if some attribute A in X can be removed from X and dependency still holds Def : A relation schema R is in 2NF if every non prime attribute A in R is fully functionally dependent on the primary key of R
- 36. •it must be in 2NF •It is based on the concept of transitive dependency • XY ,Y Z then XZ DEF : A relation schema R is in 3NF if it satisfies 2NF and no prime attribute of R is transitively dependent on the primary key X A If A is non prime attribute then X must be super key
- 39. More stricter than 3NF X A Always the left hand side must be super key whether A is prime or non prime
- 40. Here {student, course instructor} {instructor course} It is 3NF but not BCNF
- 41. BCNF is More stricter than 3NF In BCNF must check TWO conditions • X Y allowed ,if it is trivial functional dependency OR • X is a super key for schema R
- 42. A 3NF table which does not have multiple overlapping candidate keys is guaranteed to be in BCNF Ex: 3NF but not BCNF Court Start Time End Time Rate Type 1 09:30 10:00 SAVER 1 11:00 12:00 SAVER 1 14:00 15:30 STANDARD 2 10:00 11:30 PREMIUM-B 2 11:30 13:30 PREMIUM-B 2 15:00 16:30 PREMIUM-A 2 9:30 10:00 PREMIUM-A
- 43. Here the candidate keys are S1: {COURT,START TIME} S2:{COURT,END TIME} S3:{RATE TYPE,START TIME} S4:{RATE TYPE, END TIME} Here no non prime attributes , all are prime attribute belongs to some candidate key. So the table is 2NF and 3NF.but not in BCNF.
- 44. Here no non prime attributes , all are prime attribute belongs to some candidate key. So the table is 2NF and 3NF,but not in BCNF because of rate type court.
- 45. Now it is in BCNF Rate Types Rate Type SAVER STANDARD Court 1 1 Member Flag Yes No PREMIUM-A PREMIUM-B 2 2 Yes No Today's Bookings Rate Type SAVER SAVER STANDARD PREMIUM-B PREMIUM-B PREMIUM-A Start Time 09:30 11:00 14:00 10:00 11:30 15:00 End Time 10:30 12:00 15:30 11:30 13:30 16:30
- 46. Problems when using BCNF Person Shop Type Nearest Shop Thankam Optician Eagle Eye Meenu Hairdresser Snippets Pretty Bookshop Merlin Books Sreedevi Bakery Sree bakers Sreedevi Hairdresser Sweeney Sreedevi Optician Eagle Eye Dependency: A, B C CB Not BCNF
- 47. Shop Near Person Person Shop Thankam Meenu Pretty Eagle Eye Sreedevi Sreedevi Sreedevi Sree Bakers Snippets Merlin Books Sweeney Eagle Eye Shop Shop Shop Type Eagle Eye Optician Snippets Hairdresser Merlin Books Bookshop Sree Bakers Bakery Sweeney Hairdresser
- 48. Problem : It allow us to record data such as,a person’s multiple shops with same type ,It violates the dependency {person,shoptype}{shop} So BCNF is not always possible
- 49. (Lets do some problems)
- 51. NON ADDITIVE (LOSELESS) JOIN DEPENDENCY •Which ensures that no spurious tuples are generated when a NATURAL JOIN operation is applied to the relations in the decomposition • lossless refers to loss information ,not to loss of tuples.
- 52. Example of lossy decomposition Decomposition Original table A 1 1 1 B 1 1 2 C 1 2 1 A C 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 B 1 1 1 1 B 1 A 1 A 1 C 2 1 2 Reconstruction
- 53. MULTIVALUED DEPENDENCY : A consequence of first normal form, Which disallows an attribute have a set of values : A multivalued dependency is a special case of a join dependency, Course Book Lecturer AHA Silberschatz John D AHA Nederpelt William M AHA Silberschatz William M and equivalently AHA Nederpelt John D {course} {lecturer}. AHA Silberschatz Christian G AHA Nederpelt Christian G OSO Silberschatz John D OSO Silberschatz William M {course} {book}
- 54. Definition for 4th Normal Form A relation schema R is in 4NF with respect to a set of dependencies F (that include functional dependencies and multivalued dependencies ),if for every non trivial multivalued dependency X Y in F closure,X is a super key of R.
- 57. •In dependency theory, a join dependency is a constraint on the set of legal relations over a database scheme. A table T is subject to a join dependency if T can always be recreated by joining multiple tables each having a subset of the attributes of T. • If one of the tables in the join has all the attributes of the table T, the join dependency is called trivial
- 58. •If JOIN dependency is present carry out a multiway decomposition in to 5th Normal form •Such dependency is very peculiar semantic constraint, that is very difficult to detect I practice. So 5NF very rarely done in practice.