Analysis of Digital Image Forgery Detection using Adaptive Over-Segmentation Based on Feature Point Extraction and Matching

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1568
Analysis of Digital Image Forgery Detection using Adaptive Over-
Segmentation Based on Feature Point Extraction and Matching
Ch. SUDARSHAN1, U. SATHISH KUMAR2
1(M.Tech.)Dept of CSE,Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, AP, (522510), INDIA
2Assistant Professor (,M.Tech,(Ph.d)), Dept of CSE,Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, AP, (522510), INDIA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract--- The innovation of the web has presented the
unimaginable development and improvements in the
prestigious research fields, for example, pharmaceutical,
satellite symbolism, picture handling, security, biometrics,
and genetics. The methods introduced in the 21st century
has made the human life more comfortable and secure,
however the security to the original reports has a place with
the verified individual is stayed as worried in the digital
image processing area. In this paper, two methods are
proposed to detect the forged region of an image such as
Adaptive over-segmentation and feature point matching.
Thus Adaptive over-segmentation is used to extract the
features by both block-based and key point-based forgery
detection methods. Firstly, the host image is segmented into
non-overlapping and irregular blocks adaptively. Then these
block as compared to extract the feature points of a host
image; this procedure can approximately indicate the
suspected forgery regions. To trace out the forged region
efficiently, the forgery region extraction algorithm is used to
replaces the features point with the super pixels as feature
blocks and then merges the neighboring blocks that have
similar local color features into the feature block to
generate the merged region this merged region is processed
into morphological operation to detect the extracted forged
regions in an image. In cut-paste image forgery detection,
image forensic techniques are used to detect the global and
local contrast enhancement, identifying the use of histogram
equalization.
Keywords: Copy-move, Forgery detection, the adaptive
over-segmentation, feature point matching,
neighboring blocks, super pixels, feature points.
1. INTRODUCTION
The digital image processing is the prominent research
domain in the 21st century where its presence is clearly
observed in various fields. The digital image processing is
a important constituent of the electromagnetic spectrum
and the security field remain as one of the major research
areas on which lot of research needs to be done to secure
the privacy and the confidential information with greater
robustness. The forgery has become the major concerned
area in the 21st and a lot of research is carried out in the
literature but still achieving the desired results remained
as unsolved issue. The digital images are considered as the
primary source of the medium used for too meet the very
purpose which includes the data transmission, the data
compression, the data hiding and the various other
applicative research areas. The forgery of the images has
reach to the new level to pose serious issues in the 21st
century and it creates the situation where the difference
between the forged and non forged documents
identification become the biggest drawback, which is
addressed in efficient way using the proposed work.
Copy-move forgery, which is to paste one or several copied
region of an image into other part of the same image.
During the copy and move operations, some image
processing methods such as rotation, scaling, blurring,
compression, and noise addition are occasionally applied
to make convincing forgeries. Earlier blocked based
forgery detection was used to detect forged image but this
algorithm faced some drawbacks such as the host image is
divided into over-lapping rectangular blocks, which would
be computationally expensive as the size of the image
increases and it was less efficient as it take more time to be
process. To avoid such drawbacks along with the blocked
based forgery, we proposed an image-blocking method
called Adaptive Over-Segmentation that divided the host
image into non overlapping blocks adaptively with the
help of two algorithm those are Simple Linear Iterative
Clustering (SLIC) to segment the host image into irregular
blocks and Discrete Wavelength Transform (DWT) which
is employed to analyze the frequencies of the super pixel.
Further the image block formed are pass to the Block
Feature Extraction method where the block feature are
extracted by using Scale Invariant Feature Transform
(SIFT) as it possessed constant and better performance
compared with the other extraction method. Further the
process of Block Feature Matching is carried out which
used Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) for
calculating super pixel and Discrete Wavelength
Transform for finding super pixel from one block and

checking other for other blocks. When the features are
extracted and matched then we get to know which regions
the host image has been forged.
These methods are common in use for forgery detection,
but they are having following drawbacks: 1) there is very
high computational complexity as there is division of
image into overlapped regions. 2) To deal with the
geometrical transformation of the forgery area is difficult.
3) There is a low recall rate due to host image division in
regular blocks.
To address the shortcomings of the prevailing methods, we
tend to propose a unique copy-move forgery detection
scheme exploitation adaptive over-segmentation and have
purpose matching during this paper. The adaptive Over-
Segmentation algorithm is projected to adaptively divide
the host image into non-overlapping and irregular blocks.
Then the feature points are extracted from every block and
matched with every other to seek out the tagged feature
points which might approximately indicate the suspected
forgery regions. And finally the tagged feature points are
processed and also the morphological operation is applied
to get the detected forgery regions.
2. TYPES OF DIGITAL IMAGE FORGERY
Now day’s fake images have become more in society.
Tampering images are common for making controversies.
For example, it can be used for sensational news, spread
political news and rumors. As the quality of pictures
suffers, it's necessary to plot techniques so as to verify
their genuineness and trait of pictures.
Picture sterilization is characterized as ”adding, changing,
or deleting some vital options from a picture while not
exploit any obvious trace. There are totally different
techniques used for formation a picture. Taking under
consideration the ways wont to create cast pictures, digital
image forgery are often isolated into 3 primary
classifications: Copy-Move forgery, Image splice, and
Image resampling.
A. Copy-Move Forgery
In copy move forgery, in original image some part of the
image with any size is copies and pasted in that only in
some area of image it can be show in figure1. As the copied
part originated from the same image, its essential
properties such as noise, color and texture don’t change
and make the recognition process troublesome.
B. Image Forgery using Splicing
Image splicing uses cut-and-paste systems from one or a
lot of pictures to make another pretend image. once
conjunction is performed exactly, the borders between the
spliced regions will visually be unbearable. Splicing,
however, disturbs the high order Fourier statistics. These
insights will so be utilized as a locality of identifying
phony. Figure 2, demonstrates an honest sample of image
conjunction during which images the photographs the
images of the shark and also the eggbeater ar unified into
one picture.
Fig 1. (a) original Image (i) ; (b) copy Image (ii);
(c) forged image
C. Image Resampling
To make associate astounding fake image, some elite
regions got to undergo geometric transformations like
rotation, scaling, stretching, skewing, flipping and then
forth. The interpolation step plays a vital role within the
resampling method and introduces non-negligible applied
mathematics changes. Resampling introduces specific
periodic correlations into the image. These correlations
are often utilized to acknowledge phony caused by
resampling. In Figure three, the image on the left is that the
original image whereas the one on the proper is that the
cast image obtained by rotation and scaling it.
Fig 2. (a) The real image (b) final result of image
retouching

3. LITERATURE SURVEY
3.1 Detecting Duplicated Image
A technique that works by 1st applying principal element
analysis to little mounted - size image blocks to yield a
reduced dimension illustration was planned by Alin C
Popescu et al. (2004). Whereas performing arts the on top
of technique we are able to realize some duplicate pictures
(noises). Then the duplicate regions are detected by
lexicographically (the follow of aggregation
dictionaries).Sorting the whole image blocks. This can be
terribly wonderful and actual appropriate technique to
yield a reduced dimension illustration. It’s sensitive to jpeg
lossy compression and additionally it's additive to noise.
3.2 Fast Copy-Move Forgery Detection
A methodology to discover copy- move forgery by
dividing the image into overlapping blocks of equal size,
extracting feature for every block and representing it as a
vector and typing all the extracted feature vectors
victimization the base sort, was planned by Hwei-jen
sculpture et.al (2009). Base type dramatically reduces the
time complexness and also the adopted options enhance
the aptitude of resisting of varied attacks like JPEG
compression and mathematician noise. Each potency and
high detection rates are incontestable.
3.3 Robust Copy-move Forgery
Sevinc Bayram et al.(2009) projected to use Fourier-
Mellin Transform (FMT) options that square measure
invariant to scaling and translation. A replacement
detection scheme that creates use of investigation bloom
filters is additionally introduced by them. It detects copy
move forgery terribly accurately albeit the cast image is
turned, scaled or extremely compressed. This detection
scheme improves the potency. However the hardiness of
the tactic is reduced.
3.4 Detection Digital Images Using SURF
B.L.Shivakumar et al. (2011)proposed a method to detect
duplication regions. Because one of the common image
forgery methods is copy move forgery (CMF).
Identification of the CMF can be detected by the
duplication regions using Speeded Up Robust Features
(SURF) keypoints. These SURF keypoints are extracted
from images. The duplication region can be detected with
different sizes. The result shows that CMF with minimum
false match for images with high resolution. A few small
copied regions were not successfully detected.
3.5 A Sift-based Forensic Method
Irene Amerini et al. (2011) proposed a method to support
image forgery detection based on SIFT algorithm. Thus, the
algorithm is used to detect the regions which are
duplicated and determine the geometric transformation
applied to perform such tampering. But, the main
drawbacks of this technique, it is unable to detect the
image with uniform texture and salient keypoints.
3.6 Exposing Transform-invariant Features
Pravin Kakar et al. (2012) has proposed a method based
on transforming-invariant features. These got y utilizing
the features from MPEG-7 image signature devices.This
method achieved good results, accuracy and extremely low
false positives. Thus, these features are invariant to
common image processing operations. This method cannot
detect regions which have undergone affine
transformations and/or multiply copied.
4. PROPOSED METHOD
For the forgery detection process lot of importance is
given from the past years. In this paper adaptive over
segmentation and feature point matching methods are
used to detect the forgery region. The overall overview of
this method is explained in the Fig.1.
 Adaptive over-segmentation method is used to
segment the host image. The image is divided into
non-overlapping and irregular blocks. The
segmented blocks are called as image blocks (IB).
 The irregular block segmentation can be done by
the Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT)
technique, SIFT is applied to each block to get the
perfect block features (BF).
 The main important parameter of the
proposed method is detecting the suspected
forgery region, it can be detected by performing
the matching between block features with one
another. The block features which are matched
are named as Labeled Feature Points (LFP).
The LFP will plays a major role in detecting
the forgery because it is used as a reference. In
the final forgery region extraction
method is proposed to detect the forgery
region from the host image.

Fig.3: The proposed copy-move forgery detection
scheme framework
A. Adaptive over segmentation algorithm
When the size of the host image is increased the matching
computation of the overlapping blocks will become
difficult. To overcome this problem we are implementing
adaptive over segmentation. By using this method the
image is divided into non-overlapping and irregular
regions called as image blocks. The use of non-overlapping
segmentation compared to the overlapping method is to
reducing the computational complexity and compared to
the regular blocks irregular blocks can give the better
performance like we can find the more forgery region. In
the process of this method finding the initial size of the
super pixels in SLIC method is very difficult. Basically in
the copy-move forgery detection the sizes and content will
be different when it is compared with the host images. In
the proposed method different superpixels sizes will
produce different forgery results.
To get the relationship between the frequency distribution
of host images and the initial size of the superpixels a large
number of experiments are performed. By using the haar
wavelet 4-level DWT technique is applied to the host
image then the image I divided into the low-frequency
energy ELF and high-frequency energy EHF can be
calculated using (1) and (2), respectively. The percentage
of the low-frequency distribution in (3) can be
calculated by using the low-frequency ELF and high-
frequency energy EHF. The initial size of the superpixels
can be defined in (4)
∑| |
∑ (∑| | ∑| | ∑| |)
{
√
√
Where S means the initial size of the superpixels; M N
indicates the size of the host image; and P LF means the
percentage of the low-frequency distribution
Fig.4: The adaptive over-segmentation flowchart.
Labeled Feature
Points (LFP)
Forgery
Region
Output: Detected
Forgery Regions
Block Feature (BF)
Adaptive Block
feature matching
Input Blocks (IB)
Block Feature
Extraction
Input : Host image
Adaptive Over-
Segmentation
Superpixel
Segmentation
Ouput: Image
Blocks (IB)
Adaptive Block
Size
Computation
Wavelet Coefficients
Input : Host image
Discrete
Wavelet
Transform
Input block size: S

The proposed Adaptive Over-Segmentation method can
divide the host image into blocks with adaptive initial sizes
according to the given host images, with which each image
can be determined to be an appropriate block initial size to
enhance the forgery detection results.
B. Block Feature Extraction Algorithm
In the adaptive over segmentation the host image is
divided into image blocks after that the block features are
extracted from the image blocks by using the block feature
extraction algorithm. The image block content is mainly
affected by these feature extraction and these features are
non-resistance to the various image transformation
techniques. So in this method the feature points are
extracted from the each image block as block features and
these are not affected by image scaling, rotation, and JPEG
compression. The main feature point extraction methods
which are used in this proposed method are SIFT and
SURF. Compared to the previous techniques this method is
robust. When the experiment results are compared SIFT
will give better performance compared to the other feature
extraction methods. So in this every block will contain the
irregular block region information and the extracted SIFT
feature points.
C. Block Feature Matching Algorithm
In the existing system if there are so many other matching
pairs in one mutual position then only the block matching
process will give the specific block pair as a output and if
there are same shift vectors then the threshold value is
calculated then the matched blocks are which specified to
the same shift vector are identified as the regions of copied
or moved. In the proposed algorithm we are considering
the block features which consist of different feature points
so a different method is used to locate these matched
blocks.
D. Forgery Region Extraction Algorithm
After gathering the LFP (labeled feature points) then we
have to locate the forgery region. The extracted LFP
regions are taken as the forgery regions. To get the more
accuracy of the forgery region forgery region algorithm is
used. The LFP region is replaced with the small super
pixels to get the suspected regions (SR). The superpixels
are segmented from the host image. To get the more
precision and recall rates the LFP of the super pixels that
are neighbors of the suspected regions (SR) are also
measured.
Fig. 5: Flow chart of the Forgery Region Extraction
algorithm
If the LFP is same as suspected regions then the super
pixels which are neighbor are merged into the
corresponding suspected region. These results are
considered as the merged regions (MR). the final step is
detecting the copy-move forgery regions this step was
done by applying morphological operations on the merged
regions. The final flowchart of the forgery region
extraction algorithm is shown in fig.4
Algorithm: Block Feature Matching algorithm
Input: Block Features (BF);
Output: Labeled Feature Points (LFP).
STEP-1:.After generating blocks load the features of
blocksBF={BF1,BF2,….BFN} where N is denoted as
number of image blocks. And find correlation between
the blocks.
STEP-2: By distribution correlation coefficient TRb is
calculated for block matching threshold.
STEP-3: With help of TRb threshold matched blocks
(MB)are located.
STEP-4: suspected forgery regions are indicated in
the matched blocks (MB) by labeling the matched
features points.
Output: Detected
Forgery Regions
Merged Regions
(MR)
Morphology
Processing
Suspected
Regions (SR)
Local Colour
Feature
Input : Label Feature
Points (LFP)
Small super-pixels
Replacement

5. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
1) JPEG compression: the JPEG compressed images are
the forgery images. The compression can be with a quality
factor varying from 100 to 20,in steps of -10. So here we
have to test the total of 48 9=432 images.
2) Rotation: the regions which are copied are rotated by
the rotated angle varying from 2º to 10º, in steps of
2º,and the rotation angles are about 20º, 60º and 180º as
well. So here we have to test the total of 48 8=384 images.
3) Scaling or Noise: The regions which are copied are
scaled by using the scale factor varying from 91% to
109% in steps of 2%, and the scale factor is about 50%,
80%, 120%, and 200%. As well. So here we have to test
the total of 48 14=672 images.
4) Median filter: Total 48 forged host images are present
in the dataset. These images are scaled down from 90% to
10% in steps of 20%. So here we have to test the total of
48 5=240 images.
In this section, a series of experiments square measure
conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and lustiness of
the planned image forgery detection theme exploitation
adaptive over-segmentation and have purpose matching.
Within the following experiments, the image dataset in
[22] is employed to check the proposed methodology. This
dataset is made supported forty eight high-resolution
uncompressed PNG true color pictures, and the average
size of the pictures is 1500*1500. within the dataset, the
copied regions square measure from the classes of living,
nature, man-made and mixed, and that they vary from to a
fault swish to highly textured; the copy-move forgeries
square measure created by copying, scaling and rotating
semantically substantive image regions.
Fig 6: original image
Fig 7: forged image
Algorithm: Forgery Region Extraction
STEP-1: Load the Labeled Feature Points (LFP),
apply the SLIC calculation with the underlying size
S to the host picture to section it into small
superpixels as highlight squares, and supplant each
named include point with its relating highlight
piece, in this manner producing the Suspected
Regions (SR).
STEP-2: Measure the local color feature of the
superpixels neighbor to the SR, called neighbor
blocks; when their color feature is similar to that of
the suspected regions, we merge the neighbor
blocks into the corresponding SR, therefore
creating the merged regions (MR).
STEP-3: Apply the morphological close operation
into MR to finally generate the detected forgery
regions.

Fig 8: Adaptive over segmentation
Fig 9: label feature points
Fig 10: Morphed detected forgery region
Fig 11: final detected forged region.
Fig 12: Analysis of F1 Measure (a) JPEG Compression,
(b) Rotation, (c) Noise Scale and (d) Median filter.
(a) F1 measure for JPEG compression effect
(b) F1 measure for rotation effect
(c)F1 measure for noise effect
(d) F1 measure for median filter effect

Fig 13: Analysis of Precision and Recall at the pixel
level (a) JPEG Compression, (b) Rotation, (c) Noise
Scale and (d) Median filter.
(a)JPEG compression effect
(b) Rotation effect
(c) Noise effect.
(d)Median filter effect.
6. CONCLUSION
This work proposes for Image forgery detection using
adaptive over segmentation and feature point matching. In
forgery detection method proposes block based and key
points integrates scheme, first the proposed adaptive over
segmentation algorithm segments the host image into non
overlapping and irregular blocks adaptively. Then, the
feature points are extracted from each block as block
features, and the block features are matched with one
another to locate the labeled feature points; this procedure
can approximately indicate the suspected forgery regions.
To detect the forgery regions more accurately, and the
forgery region extraction algorithm, which replaces the
feature points with small super pixels as feature blocks
and then merges the neigh boring blocks that have similar
local color features into the feature blocks to generate the
merged regions.
Fig 8: Processing time SIFT and SURF

REFERENCES
[1] Q.-C. Yang And C.-L. Huang, "Copymove Forgery
Detection In Digital Image," In Advances In Multimedia
Information Processing-Pcm 2009, Ed: Springer, 2009, Pp.
816-825.
[2] B. Mahdian And S. Saic, "Blind Methods For Detecting
Image Fakery," Ieee Aerospace And Electronic Systems
Magazine, Vol. 25, Pp. 18-24, 2010.
[3] B. Shivakumar And L. D. S. Santhosh Baboo, "Detecting
Copy-Move Forgery In Digital Images: A Survey And
Analysis Of Current Methods," Global Journal Of Computer
Science And Technology, Vol. 10, 2010.
[4] K. N. Qureshi And A. H. Abdullah, "A Survey On
Intelligent Transportation Systems," Middle East Journal
Of Scientific Research, Vol. 15, 2013.
[5] W. Lu, W. Sun, J.-W. Huang, And H.-T. Lu, "Digital Image
Forensics Using Statistical Features And Neural Network
Classifier," In Machine Learning And Cybernetics, 2008
International Conference On, 2008, Pp. 2831-2834.
[6] S. Bayram, B. Sankur, N. Memon, And İ. Avcibaş, "Image
Manipulation Detection," Journal Of Electronic Imaging,
Vol. 15, Pp. 041102-041102-17, 2006.
[7] A. C. Popescu And H. Farid, "Exposing Digital Forgeries
By Detecting Traces Of Resampling," Signal Processing,
Ieee Transactions On, Vol. 53, Pp. 758-767, 2005.
[8] A. E. Dirik, S. Bayram, H. T. Sencar, And N. Memon,
"New Features To Identify Computer Generated Images,"
In Image Processing, 2007. Icip 2007. Ieee International
Conference On, 2007, Pp. Iv-433-Iv-436.
[9] M. Kharrazi, H. T. Sencar, And N. Memon, "Blind Source
Camera Identification," In Image Processing, 2004. Icip'04.
2004 International Conference On, 2004, Pp. 709-712.
[10] M.-J. Tsai And G.-H. Wu, "Using Image Features To
Identify Camera Sources," In Acoustics, Speech And Signal
Processing, 2006. Icassp 2006 Proceedings. 2006 Ieee
International Conference On, 2006, Pp. Ii-Ii.
[11] M.-J. Tsai And C.-S. Wang, "Adaptive Feature Selection
For Digital Camera Source Identification," In Circuits And
Systems, 2008. Iscas 2008. Ieee International Symposium
On, 2008, Pp. 412-415.
[12] Y. Sutcu, S. Bayram, H. T. Sencar, And N. Memon,
"Improvements On Sensor Noise Based Source Camera
Identification," In Multimedia And Expo, 2007 Ieee
International Conference On, 2007, Pp. 24-27. [13
[13] T. Chen, J. Wang, And Y. Zhou, "Combined Digital
Signature And Digital Watermark Scheme For Image
Authentication," In Info-Tech And Info- yesrNet, 2001.
Proceedings. Icii 2001-Beijing. 2001 International
Conferences On, 2001, Pp. 78-82.
BIOGRAPHIES
Ch. SUDARSHAN received the
Bachelor of Technology degree in
Computer Science engineering from
Rajive Gandhi university of
Knowledge and Technology in 2015.
Currently pursuing M.tech in
Computer Science Engineering from
Acharya Nagarjuna University. His
areas of interest include in computer science engineering
specialized in image processing and Data mining.
Mr. U.SATHISH KUMAR is currently
working as assistant professor in
Acharya Nagarjuna University from
last 3 years. Currently he is pursuing
his Ph.D degree. His research interest
includes in Computer Science and
Engineering in Data mining, image
processing and Soft computing.

Analysis of Digital Image Forgery Detection using Adaptive Over-Segmentation Based on Feature Point Extraction and Matching

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Analysis of Digital Image Forgery Detection using Adaptive Over-Segmentation Based on Feature Point Extraction and Matching (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Analysis of Digital Image Forgery Detection using Adaptive Over-Segmentation Based on Feature Point Extraction and Matching