Why I Stopped Using “Ghibli-Style” AI Art (And Why You Should Too)

Why I Stopped Using “Ghibli-Style” AI Art (And Why You Should Too)

I’ll admit it—I used to love those Ghibli-style AI images. Dreamy skies, cozy villages, quiet moments full of wonder. They felt like comfort food for the eyes. And honestly, they were everywhere—social media, moodboards, even portfolios.

But over time, something didn’t sit right with me. And once I dug deeper, I couldn’t unsee the issues.

Here’s why I no longer use Ghibli-style AI art—and why I think more of us need to question it.

1. It’s Built on Artists’ Work—Without Consent

Here’s the truth that most of us gloss over: AI models were trained on millions of images scraped from the internet—without asking anyone.

Yes, that includes art from Studio Ghibli. And countless other artists who never gave permission for their work to be copied, blended, or reimagined by a bot.

It’s like someone walking into your house, taking your family photos, and remixing them into their gallery—without telling you, crediting you, or even saying thank you. That’s not innovation. That’s theft.

Why it matters:

  • Creative ownership: Ghibli artists spent years developing a style deeply rooted in Japanese culture, history, and hand-drawn animation traditions. Lifting that style without credit or compensation diminishes the labor and identity behind it.
  • Cultural erasure: When Ghibli aesthetics are abstracted into trend-based content—especially by non-Japanese creators—it can dilute the cultural nuance they represent.

2. The Environmental Cost of AI-Generated Ghibli Art

Think using AI to create “Ghibli-style” landscapes is harmless? Think again.

Every single AI-generated image relies on intensive GPU computation, most of which runs on energy-hungry cloud infrastructure.

Consider this:

  • Training a large image generation model (like Stable Diffusion or Midjourney) emits hundreds of thousands of kilograms of CO₂.
  • Even inference (generating an image) draws significant energy—especially when scaled across millions of daily prompts.

When creators casually generate endless Ghibli-style content for moodboards, wallpapers, or posts, they’re participating in an energy-intensive process—often without awareness.

3. It’s Taking Our Pictures Too—Without Us Knowing

This is the part that really creeped me out: these models don’t just train on public artwork. Many are trained on photos of real people—often pulled from social media, online portfolios, and websites.

Without our knowledge. Without our consent.

We’ve normalized the idea that AI just "learns from the internet," but the internet is full of human faces, memories, and identities. And AI is absorbing all of it—including ours. Quietly. Invisibly.

That crosses a line. It’s not just about art anymore—it’s about privacy.

4. Dilution of Craft and Meaning

Ghibli’s visuals aren’t just pretty—they’re purposeful.

Every scene is handcrafted with story-rich symbolism: nature’s balance, fleeting childhood, anti-war sentiments, and feminist ideals. Reducing this to "cozy vibes" or Instagram backdrops cheapens the original intent.

What's at stake:

  • Audience fatigue: When every other brand or creator uses the same Ghibli-like backdrop, it loses emotional impact.
  • Creative laziness: Relying on borrowed aesthetics prevents creators from developing their own visual identity.
  • Loss of context: Ghibli’s settings are narratively driven. Using them out of context often removes the layers that made them powerful in the first place.

What You Can Do Instead

You don’t have to stop creating beautiful things. Just do it with thought and respect.

  • Support original artists (especially independent ones)
  • Make something from your ideas, not someone else’s
  • Use references carefully and responsibly
  • Think about how your work makes people feel—and why

Original art always stands out more than a copied style.

So What Now?

I’m not saying don’t use AI at all. But we need to slow down and ask better questions.

  • Where is this data coming from?
  • Whose work am I building on?
  • Would I be okay if my own face or art was in that training set?

For me, the answer was no. So I stopped. I started drawing again. I collaborated with real artists. I let my own weird ideas lead the way.

It takes more time. But it feels right.


To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Aashiya Mittal

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics