The Resume Is Dead. The Algorithm Is Hiring

The Resume Is Dead. The Algorithm Is Hiring

The Resume Was Never Built for the Future

The resume, as we know it, was never built for hiring managers. It wasn’t built for AI. It wasn’t even built for speed.

It was built for HR departments — decades ago — to organize, filter, and sort candidates by education, job titles, and tenure. And in its time, it worked.

But that time is over.


Resumes Were Made for People. The Future of Work Is Not.

Today, hiring doesn’t start with a human. It starts with:

  • A machine parsing your file
  • A model ranking your experience
  • A system matching you to keywords
  • An algorithm deciding if you're even worth a look

We’re not in the “send it to the hiring manager” era anymore. We’re in the machine-filtered era.

So why are we still building resumes for humans—when machines read them first?


The Resume’s Flaws Are Fatal in the AI Era

  • Static: Resumes show what you have done, not what you can do next
  • Unstructured: Hiring systems crave clean, structured data—resumes are freeform chaos
  • Unverifiable: Bullet points are easy to fake, impossible to test
  • Biased: Resumes over-index on pedigree, not potential or outcomes
  • Low-signal: Two people can do the same job for 3 years and have radically different levels of skill, impact, and velocity

For candidates, this means your real edge won’t come from formatting. It’ll come from proof of work.


What Algorithms Actually Want — and Why

In the age of AI, hiring is shifting from who you say you are to what the data proves you can do. Algorithms aren’t looking for polished narratives.

They’re looking for signals—structured, verifiable, performance-based data points that allow them to compare, rank, and recommend candidates with precision.

Here’s what today’s hiring algorithms are designed to surface:


✅ Skill Graphs

Networks of connected skills and experiences that reveal not just what you’ve done, but how your expertise evolves and relates to future roles.

Example: A RevOps manager’s skill graph could show how their knowledge of Salesforce, Looker, and SQL connects to projects involving pipeline forecasting, sales performance analysis, and GTM strategy—demonstrating both technical depth and cross-functional relevance.


✅ Outcome-Based Portfolios

Tangible proof of results: What you built, improved, launched, or grew. This gives machines measurable outputs to match to job needs.

Example: A marketer might showcase a portfolio highlighting a product launch that generated 2,000+ signups, a webinar campaign that drove $250K in pipeline, and a rebrand that lifted CTRs by 35%.


✅ Real-Time Behavioral Signals

Engagement data, completion rates, code commits, collaboration frequency—dynamic inputs that say more than static bullet points ever could.

Example: A product manager’s async collaboration patterns in Jira, Confluence, and Slack—combined with time-to-deliver metrics—could signal consistent velocity, responsiveness, and ownership across sprints.


✅ Verified Achievements

Digital credentials, test results, and performance analytics—data that can be validated, not just claimed.

Example: A sales leader may be tagged with verified deal history from Salesforce (e.g., “closed $1.2M in new ARR Q1 2024”), with credentials in MEDDIC methodology or Challenger sales, backed by certification metadata.


✅ AI-Generated Profiles Built on Actual Output

Profiles created by aggregating your contributions across platforms like GitHub, Notion, Figma, or internal collaboration tools—painting a picture of how you actually work.

Example: An operations leader’s AI profile might surface process documentation from Notion, automation flows from Zapier, and project outcomes from Asana—automatically tying together output across tools to summarize strategic impact.


Your Next "Resume" Might Be:

  • Your GitHub history
  • Your top 5 completed projects
  • A video explaining how you solve problems
  • An AI agent trained on your past work—ready to pitch you for the next one

Because hiring systems are no longer just filtering for qualifications— they’re optimizing for fit, speed, and future performance.

And the more structured, real, and behavior-based the data, the better the model can match the right person to the right opportunity.


The Shift Is Already Happening

  • LinkedIn is prioritizing skills-first profiles
  • Companies are piloting AI-powered candidate scoring
  • Startups are hiring via portfolios, prompts, and projects—not just paper
  • Hiring platforms are surfacing output and velocity, not job titles


The Takeaway

Resumes were designed to impress people. The future of hiring will be built to impress machines—by proving real value.

So if you're still tweaking bullet points and formatting PDFs, you're optimizing for a system that’s being replaced in real time.



Volker Dahm

Managing Partner @ Recruitment Firm | Executive Search

1mo

I totally agree with your thoughts where achievements are more relevant then static paper. Now it comes the but.... But If you are working as an employee who does not need github? Or your mentioned sales person. The company who he is/was working for needs to open up their data and has to link the specific sale to him/her. Is that happen? Are the companies that open?

Kristin Pozen

Executive Recruiter | Banking & Financial Services | Renewables | Human Resources | Healthcare | Real Estate | Sustainability | Non-Profits | Circular Economy | Technology | Environmental & Social Justice

1mo

Interesting article. I agree there will be less human interaction with future applicants. If AI serves as the gatekeeper, your resume must speak its language.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Alex King

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics