The IAM Revolution: Why Your Security is Failing Your Users (And Vice Versa)
DISCLAIMER
The following content represents personal opinions and is intended solely to provoke thought and stimulate discussion within the cybersecurity community. These views do not reflect the official stance, policies, or practices of my current or past employers, clients, or any affiliated organizations. This piece is a thought experiment and should not be interpreted as professional advice or as a criticism of any specific company, product, or service. Reader discretion is advised.
In the world of Identity and Access Management (IAM), we've been sold a lie. The lie that we can have both ironclad security and frictionless user experience. It's time to face the truth: traditional IAM is dead, and continuing to cling to outdated practices is not just ineffective—it's dangerous.
The Hard Truth
Recommended by LinkedIn
The Revolutionary Approach
It's time for a radical rethink. Here's what the future of IAM looks like:
The companies that will survive the next wave of cyber threats won't be the ones with the most complex passwords or the most factors in their MFA. They'll be the ones who recognize that IAM isn't just a security function—it's a business enabler that requires continuous innovation and a willingness to challenge every assumption.
It's time to stop playing defense. The IAM of tomorrow is proactive, intelligent, and unapologetically prioritizes genuine security over the illusion of convenience. Are you ready to join the revolution, or will you be left defending a perimeter that no longer exists?
IT Audit Manager
6moGood one!!
Building and Coaching Sales Teams, Seed to IPO
6moGreat points Srikanth Rajan (Sri), than you for sharing! We see end users re-using their SSO passwords in Shadow IT accounts that seem to be proliferating in environments. We have to find a way to reduce complexity but have a viable friction so people/users aren’t skimming through important security triggers blindly. The tradeoff between privacy - security- and ease of use has no standard and organizations take this up as a part of their culture (not a bad thing) it just adds complexity to a problem that needs more industry discussion. Different industries have different regulations and requirements but the fact is the bad guys will come for you if they can make money, whether you’re a car dealership or a healthcare company. In a world of constant political strife and a burgeoning AI revolution the stakes are high. If you want to “batten down the hatches” it seems like you would want to make sure all your doors were closed and had locks on them? Or maybe identity breaches are a fait accompli? I certainly hope not as many of us continue to fight the good fight. (Sorry you hit good points, and possibly a nerve, rant over)
Enterprise IAM Orchestration Guide | Multi-IDP/Cloud Strategy
7moWould something like continuous access evaluation meet your second revolutionary point?
IAMONES: Enter the Conversational IAM age
7moI could not agree more on most of your points, particularly #3 of the Hard Truths (Users). As a veteran in this domain, I've seen complexity in the User Experience increase like hell, let alone configuration efforts. We need to make things simpler, and Yes I think Large Language Models are THE true change ingredient, at least for the Governance and Automation part. We IAMONES do this: Ask and configure everything with your mother tongue.
Sales | Ransomware Protection | identity shepherd
7moNo hot takes here. Maybe some hard-to-swallow pills. I hope this gets a lot of attention.