Artificial Ingenuity?

As a keen innovator, I’m curious to what extent machines can be truly innovative. Can the machine learning models of today really create something new and ground-breaking from the zettabytes of data available to them (aka the internet)? 

This week I’m in conversation with Claude.  

MO: “Do you think it's possible for machines to be truly innovative?” 

Claude: “Machines are skilled at recombining information and optimizing solutions. Artificial intelligence excels in, for example, drug discovery, designing advanced chips, and improving dexterity in robots. But machines may struggle with the more abstract, conceptual leaps that only human innovators can make. AI currently lacks the full breadth of contextual understanding and subjective experiences that often drive human creativity. 

What are your thoughts on the potential for machine innovation? I'm curious to hear your perspective.” 

Claude mentioned ‘contextual understanding and subjective experiences’… are these prerequisites for true ingenuity? 

Claude gives me three points of view to consider: 

1. The ‘subjective’ view 

Many philosophers and cognitive scientists argue that first-person conscious experience is a crucial component of human creativity and ingenuity. The rich tapestry of sensations, emotions, memories and intuitions that arise from our conscious minds are fundamental to the generative, problem-solving abilities that drive innovation. 

1. The ‘functional’ view 

Others argue that the cognitive capabilities underlying human ingenuity, such as pattern recognition, reasoning, analytical thinking, can in principle be replicated in artificial systems.  

1. The ‘emergist’ view 

The idea that consciousness and subjective experience may emerge from sufficiently complex information processing systems, even in AI. This could mean that advanced AI systems may eventually develop their own forms of consciousness that enable innovative breakthroughs. 

Do you see consciousness as essential to ingenuity, or do you think that the functional cognitive capabilities of AI are sufficient for true innovation?” 

I continued the discussion with Claude and was impressed by its ability to present me with balanced and nuanced viewpoints. 

Questions prompted as a result of this conversation: 

• Where do artificial intelligence and human intelligence converge/diverge? 
• What use cases are AI systems best suited for? 
• What will humans always do better than machines? 

Next week, I’ll be having a look at AI-generated art.  

Copyright © Mark Omfalos 2024