SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Section 2.8
 Linear Approximation and Differentials

                V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I

                         New York University


                         May 26, 2010


Announcements

   Quiz 2 Thursday on Sections 1.5–2.5
   No class Monday, May 31
   Assignment 2 due Tuesday, June 1

                                               .   .   .   .   .   .
Announcements




           Quiz 2 Thursday on
           Sections 1.5–2.5
           No class Monday, May 31
           Assignment 2 due
           Tuesday, June 1




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       2 / 27
Objectives
           Use tangent lines to make
           linear approximations to a
           function.
                   Given a function and a
                   point in the domain,
                   compute the
                   linearization of the
                   function at that point.
                   Use linearization to
                   approximate values of
                   functions
           Given a function, compute
           the differential of that
           function
           Use the differential
           notation to estimate error
           in linear approximations.                                       .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       3 / 27
Outline



 The linear approximation of a function near a point
   Examples
   Questions


 Differentials
     Using differentials to estimate error


 Advanced Examples




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       4 / 27
The Big Idea

 Question
 Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f
 near a?




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       5 / 27
The Big Idea

 Question
 Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f
 near a?

 Answer
 The tangent line, of course!




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       5 / 27
The Big Idea

 Question
 Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f
 near a?

 Answer
 The tangent line, of course!

 Question
 What is the equation for the line tangent to y = f(x) at (a, f(a))?




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       5 / 27
The Big Idea

 Question
 Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f
 near a?

 Answer
 The tangent line, of course!

 Question
 What is the equation for the line tangent to y = f(x) at (a, f(a))?

 Answer

                                        L(x) = f(a) + f′ (a)(x − a)

                                                                              .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)      Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       5 / 27
The tangent line is a linear approximation



                                                              y
                                                              .


        L(x) = f(a) + f′ (a)(x − a)

  is a decent approximation to f                      L
                                                      . (x)                              .
  near a.                                              f
                                                       .(x)                              .

                                                       f
                                                       .(a)                .
                                                                               .
                                                                               x−a




                                                               .                                       x
                                                                                                       .
                                                                           a
                                                                           .         x
                                                                                     .

                                                                               .     .       .     .       .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                         May 26, 2010       6 / 27
The tangent line is a linear approximation



                                                              y
                                                              .


        L(x) = f(a) + f′ (a)(x − a)

  is a decent approximation to f                      L
                                                      . (x)                              .
  near a.                                              f
                                                       .(x)                              .
  How decent? The closer x is to
  a, the better the approxmation                       f
                                                       .(a)                .
                                                                               .
                                                                               x−a
  L(x) is to f(x)

                                                               .                                       x
                                                                                                       .
                                                                           a
                                                                           .         x
                                                                                     .

                                                                               .     .       .     .       .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                         May 26, 2010       6 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.




 .

                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)

        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0
        and f′ (0) = 1.
        So the linear approximation
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.
        Thus
             (      )
                61π       61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465
                180       180

 .

                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                               (π)
                                                                  We have f            =         and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )            3
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = .
                                                                     3
        So the linear approximation
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.
        Thus
             (      )
                61π       61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465
                180       180

 .

                                                                           .   .       .     .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                   May 26, 2010        7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                               (π)         √
                                                                                            3
                                                                  We have f            =            and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )            3       2
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = .
                                                                     3
        So the linear approximation
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.
        Thus
             (      )
                61π       61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465
                180       180

 .

                                                                           .   .       .        .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                    May 26, 2010          7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                               (π)         √
                                                                                            3
                                                                  We have f            =            and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )            3       2
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = 1 .
                                                                     3   2
        So the linear approximation
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.
        Thus
             (      )
                61π       61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465
                180       180

 .

                                                                           .   .       .        .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                    May 26, 2010          7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                               (π)         √
                                                                                            3
                                                                  We have f            =            and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )            3       2
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = 1 .
                                                                     3   2
        So the linear approximation
                                                                  So L(x) =
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.
        Thus
             (      )
                61π       61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465
                180       180

 .

                                                                           .   .       .        .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                    May 26, 2010          7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                               (π)         √
                                                                                            3
                                                                  We have f            =            and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )            3       2
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = 1 .
                                                                     3   2         √
        So the linear approximation                                                  3 1(    π)
                                                                  So L(x) =           +   x−
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.                                             2   2    3
        Thus
             (      )
                61π       61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465
                180       180

 .

                                                                           .   .       .        .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                    May 26, 2010          7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                                     (π)         √
                                                                                                  3
                                                                  We have f                  =             and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )                  3       2
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = 1 .
                                                                     3   2               √
        So the linear approximation                                                        3 1(    π)
                                                                  So L(x) =                 +   x−
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.                                                   2   2    3
        Thus                                                      Thus
             (      )                                                            (           )
                61π       61π                                                        61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465                                   sin                   ≈
                180       180                                                        180


 .

                                                                            .        .       .         .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                             May 26, 2010        7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                                     (π)          √
                                                                                                   3
                                                                  We have f                  =             and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )                  3        2
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = 1 .
                                                                     3   2               √
        So the linear approximation                                                        3 1(    π)
                                                                  So L(x) =                 +   x−
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.                                                   2   2    3
        Thus                                                      Thus
             (      )                                                            (           )
                61π       61π                                                        61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465                                   sin                   ≈ 0.87475
                180       180                                                        180


 .

                                                                            .        .       .         .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                           May 26, 2010          7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                                     (π)          √
                                                                                                   3
                                                                  We have f                  =             and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )                  3        2
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = 1 .
                                                                     3   2               √
        So the linear approximation                                                        3 1(    π)
                                                                  So L(x) =                 +   x−
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.                                                   2   2    3
        Thus                                                      Thus
             (      )                                                            (           )
                61π       61π                                                        61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465                                   sin                   ≈ 0.87475
                180       180                                                        180


 Calculator check: sin(61◦ ) ≈
 .

                                                                            .        .       .         .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                           May 26, 2010          7 / 27
Example
 .
 Example
 Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation
 (i) about a = 0     (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3.


 Solution (i)                                              Solution (ii)
                                                                                     (π)          √
                                                                                                   3
                                                                  We have f                  =             and
        If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0                              ( )                  3        2
        and f′ (0) = 1.                                           f′ π = 1 .
                                                                     3   2               √
        So the linear approximation                                                        3 1(    π)
                                                                  So L(x) =                 +   x−
        near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x.                                                   2   2    3
        Thus                                                      Thus
             (      )                                                            (           )
                61π       61π                                                        61π
         sin           ≈       ≈ 1.06465                                   sin                   ≈ 0.87475
                180       180                                                        180


 Calculator check: sin(61◦ ) ≈ 0.87462.
 .

                                                                            .        .       .         .         .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                           May 26, 2010          7 / 27
Illustration

          y
          .




                                                                     y
                                                                     . = sin x




          .                                                                        x
                                                                                   .
                                                 . 1◦
                                                 6
                                                                           .   .       .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                   May 26, 2010       8 / 27
Illustration

          y
          .
                                                                  y
                                                                  . = L1 (x) = x




                                                                     y
                                                                     . = sin x




          .                                                                        x
                                                                                   .
              0
              .                                  . 1◦
                                                 6
                                                                           .   .       .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                   May 26, 2010       8 / 27
Illustration

          y
          .
                                                                  y
                                                                  . = L1 (x) = x




                           b
                           . ig difference!                          y
                                                                     . = sin x




          .                                                                        x
                                                                                   .
              0
              .                                  . 1◦
                                                 6
                                                                           .   .       .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                   May 26, 2010       8 / 27
Illustration

          y
          .
                                                                  y
                                                                  . = L1 (x) = x


                                                                                   √                   (            )
                                                                  y
                                                                  . = L2 (x) =     2
                                                                                    3
                                                                                           +       1
                                                                                                   2       x−   π
                                                                                                                3
                                                                    y
                                                                    . = sin x
                                               .




          .                                    .                                   x
                                                                                   .
              0
              .                         .
                                        π/3        . 1◦
                                                   6
                                                                           .   .       .       .           .        .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                   May 26, 2010                 8 / 27
Illustration

          y
          .
                                                                  y
                                                                  . = L1 (x) = x


                                                                                   √                   (            )
                                                               y
                                                               . = L2 (x) =        2
                                                                                    3
                                                                                           +       1
                                                                                                   2       x−   π
                                                                                                                3
                                                                 y
                                                                 . = sin x
                                               . . ery little difference!
                                                 v




          .                                    .                                   x
                                                                                   .
              0
              .                         .
                                        π/3        . 1◦
                                                   6
                                                                           .   .       .       .           .        .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                   May 26, 2010                 8 / 27
Another Example

 Example
                 √
 Estimate         10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1.




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       9 / 27
Another Example

 Example
                 √
 Estimate         10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1.

 Solution
                                                                                   √
 The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =
                     √                                                              x near a = 9
 to estimate f(10) = 10.




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       9 / 27
Another Example

 Example
                 √
 Estimate         10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1.

 Solution
                                                                                   √
 The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =
                     √                                                              x near a = 9
 to estimate f(10) = 10.
                               √    √     d√
                                10 ≈ 9 +      x     (1)
                                          dx    x=9
                                         1        19
                                   =3+      (1) =     ≈ 3.167
                                       2·3         6




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       9 / 27
Another Example

 Example
                 √
 Estimate         10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1.

 Solution
                                                                                   √
 The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =
                     √                                                              x near a = 9
 to estimate f(10) = 10.
                                √    √     d√
                                 10 ≈ 9 +      x     (1)
                                           dx    x=9
                                          1        19
                                    =3+      (1) =     ≈ 3.167
                                        2·3         6

              (        )2
                  19
 Check:                     =
                  6
                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       9 / 27
Another Example

 Example
                 √
 Estimate         10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1.

 Solution
                                                                                   √
 The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) =
                     √                                                              x near a = 9
 to estimate f(10) = 10.
                                √    √     d√
                                 10 ≈ 9 +      x     (1)
                                           dx    x=9
                                          1        19
                                    =3+      (1) =     ≈ 3.167
                                        2·3         6

              (        )2
                  19            361
 Check:                     =       .
                  6             36
                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010       9 / 27
Dividing without dividing?
 Example
 Suppose I have an irrational fear of division and need to estimate
 577 ÷ 408. I write
                         577            1             1  1
                             = 1 + 169     = 1 + 169 × ×    .
                         408           408            4 102
                                         1
 But still I have to find                   .
                                        102




                                                                               .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   10 / 27
Dividing without dividing?
 Example
 Suppose I have an irrational fear of division and need to estimate
 577 ÷ 408. I write
                         577            1             1  1
                             = 1 + 169     = 1 + 169 × ×    .
                         408           408            4 102
                                         1
 But still I have to find                   .
                                        102

 Solution
                  1
 Let f(x) =         . We know f(100) and we want to estimate f(102).
                  x
                                                                  1   1
             f(102) ≈ f(100) + f′ (100)(2) =                        −     (2) = 0.0098
                                                                 100 1002
                                                    577
                                            =⇒          ≈ 1.41405
                                                    408                        .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   10 / 27
Questions

 Example
 Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr.
 How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?




                                                                           .   .   .     .      .     .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   11 / 27
Answers


 Example
 Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr.
 How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   12 / 27
Answers


 Example
 Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr.
 How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?

 Answer

         100 mi
         150 mi
         600 mi (?) (Is it reasonable to assume 12 hours at the same
         speed?)



                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   12 / 27
Questions

 Example
 Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr.
 How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?

 Example
 Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is
 currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more
 lots? 12 more lots?




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   13 / 27
Answers


 Example
 Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is
 currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more
 lots? 12 more lots?

 Answer

         $100
         $150
         $600 (?)




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   14 / 27
Questions

 Example
 Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr.
 How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight?

 Example
 Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is
 currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more
 lots? 12 more lots?

 Example
 Suppose a line goes through the point (x0 , y0 ) and has slope m. If the
 point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the
 corresponding vertical movement?

                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   15 / 27
Answers


 Example
 Suppose a line goes through the point (x0 , y0 ) and has slope m. If the
 point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the
 corresponding vertical movement?




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   16 / 27
Answers


 Example
 Suppose a line goes through the point (x0 , y0 ) and has slope m. If the
 point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the
 corresponding vertical movement?

 Answer
 The slope of the line is
                                      rise
                                                m=
                                      run
 We are given a “run” of dx, so the corresponding “rise” is m dx.



                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   16 / 27
Outline



 The linear approximation of a function near a point
   Examples
   Questions


 Differentials
     Using differentials to estimate error


 Advanced Examples




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   17 / 27
Differentials are another way to express derivatives


       f(x + ∆x) − f(x) ≈ f′ (x) ∆x                            y
                                                               .
                  ∆y                    dy

  Rename ∆x = dx, so we can
  write this as
                                                                                       .
             ∆y ≈ dy = f′ (x)dx.                                                                .
                                                                                                dy
                                                                                           .
                                                                                           ∆y

  And this looks a lot like the                                             .
                                                                             .
                                                                             dx = ∆x
  Leibniz-Newton identity

                    dy                                          .
                       = f′ (x)                                                                             x
                                                                                                            .
                    dx                                                      x x
                                                                            . . + ∆x


                                                                             .     .            .       .       .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                            May 26, 2010   18 / 27
Differentials are another way to express derivatives


       f(x + ∆x) − f(x) ≈ f′ (x) ∆x                            y
                                                               .
                  ∆y                    dy

  Rename ∆x = dx, so we can
  write this as
                                                                                       .
             ∆y ≈ dy = f′ (x)dx.                                                                .
                                                                                                dy
                                                                                           .
                                                                                           ∆y

  And this looks a lot like the                                             .
                                                                             .
                                                                             dx = ∆x
  Leibniz-Newton identity

                    dy                                          .
                       = f′ (x)                                                                             x
                                                                                                            .
                    dx                                                      x x
                                                                            . . + ∆x
 Linear approximation means ∆y ≈ dy = f′ (x0 ) dx near x0 .
                                                                             .     .            .       .       .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                            May 26, 2010   18 / 27
Using differentials to estimate error



                                                              y
                                                              .
  If y = f(x), x0 and ∆x is known,
  and an estimate of ∆y is
  desired:
          Approximate: ∆y ≈ dy                                                        .
          Differentiate: dy = f′ (x) dx                                                   .
                                                                                          ∆y
                                                                                               .
                                                                                               dy


          Evaluate at x = x0 and                                           .
                                                                            .
                                                                            dx = ∆x
          dx = ∆x.

                                                               .                                           x
                                                                                                           .
                                                                           x x
                                                                           . . + ∆x

                                                                            .     .            .       .       .   .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                            May 26, 2010   19 / 27
Example
 A sheet of plywood measures 8 ft × 4 ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting
 machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but
 the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the
 area of the sheet be off by?




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   20 / 27
Example
 A sheet of plywood measures 8 ft × 4 ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting
 machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but
 the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the
 area of the sheet be off by?

 Solution
                       1 2
 Write A(ℓ) =            ℓ . We want to know ∆A when ℓ = 8 ft and ∆ℓ = 1 in.
                       2




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   20 / 27
Example
 A sheet of plywood measures 8 ft × 4 ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting
 machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but
 the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the
 area of the sheet be off by?

 Solution
                1 2
 Write A(ℓ) =     ℓ . We want to know ∆A when ℓ = 8 ft and ∆ℓ = 1 in.
                2      ( )
                         97     9409         9409
     (I) A(ℓ + ∆ℓ) = A       =       So ∆A =       − 32 ≈ 0.6701.
                         12      288          288




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   20 / 27
Example
 A sheet of plywood measures 8 ft × 4 ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting
 machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but
 the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the
 area of the sheet be off by?

 Solution
                 1 2
 Write A(ℓ) =      ℓ . We want to know ∆A when ℓ = 8 ft and ∆ℓ = 1 in.
                 2      ( )
                          97      9409            9409
     (I) A(ℓ + ∆ℓ) = A         =       So ∆A =         − 32 ≈ 0.6701.
                          12      288             288
         dA
    (II)     = ℓ, so dA = ℓ dℓ, which should be a good estimate for ∆ℓ.
         dℓ
         When ℓ = 8 and dℓ = 12 , we have dA = 12 = 2 ≈ 0.667. So we
                                1                  8
                                                       3
         get estimates close to the hundredth of a square foot.

                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   20 / 27
Why?



 Why use linear approximations dy when the actual difference ∆y is
 known?
         Linear approximation is quick and reliable. Finding ∆y exactly
         depends on the function.
         These examples are overly simple. See the “Advanced Examples”
         later.
         In real life, sometimes only f(a) and f′ (a) are known, and not the
         general f(x).




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   21 / 27
Outline



 The linear approximation of a function near a point
   Examples
   Questions


 Differentials
     Using differentials to estimate error


 Advanced Examples




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   22 / 27
Gravitation
Pencils down!

 Example

         Drop a 1 kg ball off the roof of the Silver Center (50m high). We
         usually say that a falling object feels a force F = −mg from gravity.




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   23 / 27
Gravitation
Pencils down!

 Example

         Drop a 1 kg ball off the roof of the Silver Center (50m high). We
         usually say that a falling object feels a force F = −mg from gravity.
         In fact, the force felt is
                                                              GMm
                                              F(r) = −            ,
                                                               r2
         where M is the mass of the earth and r is the distance from the
         center of the earth to the object. G is a constant.
                                                GMm
         At r = re the force really is F(re ) =      = −mg.
                                                 r2
                                                  e
         What is the maximum error in replacing the actual force felt at the
         top of the building F(re + ∆r) by the force felt at ground level
         F(re )? The relative error? The percentage error?                 .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   23 / 27
Gravitation Solution
 Solution
 We wonder if ∆F = F(re + ∆r) − F(re ) is small.
         Using a linear approximation,

                                                dF           GMm
                                  ∆F ≈ dF =           dr = 2 3 dr
                                                dr re         re
                                                (      )
                                                  GMm dr           ∆r
                                              =     2
                                                             = 2mg
                                                   re     re       re

                             ∆F        ∆r
         The relative error is   ≈ −2
                              F        re
         re = 6378.1 km. If ∆r = 50 m,
              ∆F      ∆r         50
                 ≈ −2    = −2         = −1.56 × 10−5 = −0.00156%
               F      re      6378100
                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   24 / 27
Systematic linear approximation

         √                    √
          2 is irrational, but 9/4 is rational and 9/4 is close to 2.




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   25 / 27
Systematic linear approximation

         √                    √
          2 is irrational, but 9/4 is rational and 9/4 is close to 2. So
                          √   √           √                            1                  17
                           2 = 9/4 − 1/4 ≈ 9/4 +                               (−1/4) =
                                                                   2(3/2)                 12




                                                                           .     .   .       .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                  May 26, 2010   25 / 27
Systematic linear approximation

         √                    √
          2 is irrational, but 9/4 is rational and 9/4 is close to 2. So
                          √   √           √                            1                  17
                           2 = 9/4 − 1/4 ≈ 9/4 +                               (−1/4) =
                                                                   2(3/2)                 12


         This is a better approximation since (17/12)2 = 289/144




                                                                           .     .   .       .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                  May 26, 2010   25 / 27
Systematic linear approximation

         √                    √
          2 is irrational, but 9/4 is rational and 9/4 is close to 2. So
                          √   √           √                            1                  17
                           2 = 9/4 − 1/4 ≈ 9/4 +                               (−1/4) =
                                                                   2(3/2)                 12


         This is a better approximation since (17/12)2 = 289/144
         Do it again!
             √   √                 √                                    1
              2 = 289/144 − 1/144 ≈ 289/144 +                                 (−1/144) = 577/408
                                                                     2(17/12)
                 (         )2
                     577            332, 929             1
         Now                    =            which is          away from 2.
                     408            166, 464          166, 464

                                                                           .     .   .       .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                  May 26, 2010   25 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                   .




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                   .




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                   .
                                                          2
                                                          .




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                                               .




                                   .
                                                          2
                                                          .




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                                               .




                                   .
                                                          2
                                                          .




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                               . 2, 17 )
                                               ( 12
                                                           . .




                                   .
                                                           2
                                                           .




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                               . 2, 17 )
                                               ( 12
                                                           . .




                                   .
                                                           2
                                                           .




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                                                       .
                                        . 2, 17/12)
                                        (
                                                        .                  . 4, 3)
                                                                           (9 2




                                                                            .        .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                     May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                                                       .
                                        . 2, 17/12)
                                        (
                                                        .. (              . 9, 3)
                                                                          (
                                                                          )4 2
                                                               289 17
                                                          .    144 , 12




                                                                            .       .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation                    May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Illustration of the previous example




                                                                 .
                                        . 2, 17/12)
                                        (
                                                    .. (           . 9, 3)
                                                                   (
                                         ( 577 )                  )4 2
                                         . 2, 408        289 17
                                                       . 144 , 12




                                                                           .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   26 / 27
Summary


         Linear approximation: If f is differentiable at a, the best linear
         approximation to f near a is given by

                                        Lf,a (x) = f(a) + f′ (a)(x − a)

         Differentials: If f is differentiable at x, a good approximation to
         ∆y = f(x + ∆x) − f(x) is

                                                         dy        dy
                                        ∆y ≈ dy =           · dx =    · ∆x
                                                         dx        dx
         Don’t buy plywood from me.



                                                                             .   .   .      .      .    .

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)     Section 2.8 Linear Approximation               May 26, 2010   27 / 27
Ad

More Related Content

What's hot (15)

Em10 fl
Em10 flEm10 fl
Em10 fl
nahomyitbarek
 
Johan Suykens: "Models from Data: a Unifying Picture"
Johan Suykens: "Models from Data: a Unifying Picture" Johan Suykens: "Models from Data: a Unifying Picture"
Johan Suykens: "Models from Data: a Unifying Picture"
ieee_cis_cyprus
 
Lesson 1: Functions
Lesson 1: FunctionsLesson 1: Functions
Lesson 1: Functions
Matthew Leingang
 
05 history of cv a machine learning (theory) perspective on computer vision
05  history of cv a machine learning (theory) perspective on computer vision05  history of cv a machine learning (theory) perspective on computer vision
05 history of cv a machine learning (theory) perspective on computer vision
zukun
 
A likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation EM algorithm (SAEM)...
A likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation EM algorithm (SAEM)...A likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation EM algorithm (SAEM)...
A likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation EM algorithm (SAEM)...
Umberto Picchini
 
Quasi Lie systems and applications
Quasi Lie systems and applicationsQuasi Lie systems and applications
Quasi Lie systems and applications
delucasaraujo
 
Cunningham slides-ch2
Cunningham slides-ch2Cunningham slides-ch2
Cunningham slides-ch2
cunningjames
 
Tro07 sparse-solutions-talk
Tro07 sparse-solutions-talkTro07 sparse-solutions-talk
Tro07 sparse-solutions-talk
mpbchina
 
Theory of Relations (2)
Theory of Relations (2)Theory of Relations (2)
Theory of Relations (2)
Yoshihiro Mizoguchi
 
Lesson 4: Continuity
Lesson 4: ContinuityLesson 4: Continuity
Lesson 4: Continuity
Matthew Leingang
 
project report(1)
project report(1)project report(1)
project report(1)
Conor Bradley
 
Curve fitting
Curve fittingCurve fitting
Curve fitting
JULIO GONZALEZ SANZ
 
Optimal Finite Difference Grids for Elliptic and Parabolic PDEs with Applicat...
Optimal Finite Difference Grids for Elliptic and Parabolic PDEs with Applicat...Optimal Finite Difference Grids for Elliptic and Parabolic PDEs with Applicat...
Optimal Finite Difference Grids for Elliptic and Parabolic PDEs with Applicat...
Alex (Oleksiy) Varfolomiyev
 
Desm s mathematics
Desm s mathematicsDesm s mathematics
Desm s mathematics
Ajaypal Yadav
 
Gm2511821187
Gm2511821187Gm2511821187
Gm2511821187
IJERA Editor
 
Johan Suykens: "Models from Data: a Unifying Picture"
Johan Suykens: "Models from Data: a Unifying Picture" Johan Suykens: "Models from Data: a Unifying Picture"
Johan Suykens: "Models from Data: a Unifying Picture"
ieee_cis_cyprus
 
05 history of cv a machine learning (theory) perspective on computer vision
05  history of cv a machine learning (theory) perspective on computer vision05  history of cv a machine learning (theory) perspective on computer vision
05 history of cv a machine learning (theory) perspective on computer vision
zukun
 
A likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation EM algorithm (SAEM)...
A likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation EM algorithm (SAEM)...A likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation EM algorithm (SAEM)...
A likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation EM algorithm (SAEM)...
Umberto Picchini
 
Quasi Lie systems and applications
Quasi Lie systems and applicationsQuasi Lie systems and applications
Quasi Lie systems and applications
delucasaraujo
 
Cunningham slides-ch2
Cunningham slides-ch2Cunningham slides-ch2
Cunningham slides-ch2
cunningjames
 
Tro07 sparse-solutions-talk
Tro07 sparse-solutions-talkTro07 sparse-solutions-talk
Tro07 sparse-solutions-talk
mpbchina
 
Optimal Finite Difference Grids for Elliptic and Parabolic PDEs with Applicat...
Optimal Finite Difference Grids for Elliptic and Parabolic PDEs with Applicat...Optimal Finite Difference Grids for Elliptic and Parabolic PDEs with Applicat...
Optimal Finite Difference Grids for Elliptic and Parabolic PDEs with Applicat...
Alex (Oleksiy) Varfolomiyev
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 6: The Derivative
Lesson 6: The DerivativeLesson 6: The Derivative
Lesson 6: The Derivative
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (slides)
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (slides)Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (slides)
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 10: The Chain Rule
Lesson 10: The Chain RuleLesson 10: The Chain Rule
Lesson 10: The Chain Rule
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 9: The Product and Quotient Rules
Lesson 9: The Product and Quotient RulesLesson 9: The Product and Quotient Rules
Lesson 9: The Product and Quotient Rules
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson18 -maximum_and_minimum_values_slides
Lesson18  -maximum_and_minimum_values_slidesLesson18  -maximum_and_minimum_values_slides
Lesson18 -maximum_and_minimum_values_slides
Matthew Leingang
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 28: Integration by Subsitution
Lesson 28: Integration by SubsitutionLesson 28: Integration by Subsitution
Lesson 28: Integration by Subsitution
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives
Lesson 23: AntiderivativesLesson 23: Antiderivatives
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem
Lesson 19: The Mean Value TheoremLesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 17: Indeterminate Forms and L'Hôpital's Rule
Lesson 17: Indeterminate Forms and L'Hôpital's RuleLesson 17: Indeterminate Forms and L'Hôpital's Rule
Lesson 17: Indeterminate Forms and L'Hôpital's Rule
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the shapes of curves
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the shapes of curvesLesson 20: Derivatives and the shapes of curves
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the shapes of curves
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 5: Limits Involving Infinity
Lesson 5: Limits Involving InfinityLesson 5: Limits Involving Infinity
Lesson 5: Limits Involving Infinity
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation RulesLesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 27: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Lesson 27: The Fundamental Theorem of CalculusLesson 27: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Lesson 27: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 7: The Derivative as a Function
Lesson 7: The Derivative as a FunctionLesson 7: The Derivative as a Function
Lesson 7: The Derivative as a Function
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 2: The Concept of Limit
Lesson 2: The Concept of LimitLesson 2: The Concept of Limit
Lesson 2: The Concept of Limit
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 13: Related Rates Problems
Lesson 13: Related Rates ProblemsLesson 13: Related Rates Problems
Lesson 13: Related Rates Problems
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (slides)
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (slides)Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (slides)
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (slides)
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (slides)Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (slides)
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 9: The Product and Quotient Rules
Lesson 9: The Product and Quotient RulesLesson 9: The Product and Quotient Rules
Lesson 9: The Product and Quotient Rules
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson18 -maximum_and_minimum_values_slides
Lesson18  -maximum_and_minimum_values_slidesLesson18  -maximum_and_minimum_values_slides
Lesson18 -maximum_and_minimum_values_slides
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 28: Integration by Subsitution
Lesson 28: Integration by SubsitutionLesson 28: Integration by Subsitution
Lesson 28: Integration by Subsitution
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives
Lesson 23: AntiderivativesLesson 23: Antiderivatives
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem
Lesson 19: The Mean Value TheoremLesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 17: Indeterminate Forms and L'Hôpital's Rule
Lesson 17: Indeterminate Forms and L'Hôpital's RuleLesson 17: Indeterminate Forms and L'Hôpital's Rule
Lesson 17: Indeterminate Forms and L'Hôpital's Rule
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the shapes of curves
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the shapes of curvesLesson 20: Derivatives and the shapes of curves
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the shapes of curves
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 5: Limits Involving Infinity
Lesson 5: Limits Involving InfinityLesson 5: Limits Involving Infinity
Lesson 5: Limits Involving Infinity
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation RulesLesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 27: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Lesson 27: The Fundamental Theorem of CalculusLesson 27: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Lesson 27: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 7: The Derivative as a Function
Lesson 7: The Derivative as a FunctionLesson 7: The Derivative as a Function
Lesson 7: The Derivative as a Function
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 2: The Concept of Limit
Lesson 2: The Concept of LimitLesson 2: The Concept of Limit
Lesson 2: The Concept of Limit
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 13: Related Rates Problems
Lesson 13: Related Rates ProblemsLesson 13: Related Rates Problems
Lesson 13: Related Rates Problems
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (slides)
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (slides)Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (slides)
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Ad

Similar to Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (20)

Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 41 slides)Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 41 slides)
Mel Anthony Pepito
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation
Lesson 12: Linear ApproximationLesson 12: Linear Approximation
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation
Lesson 12: Linear ApproximationLesson 12: Linear Approximation
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation
guest27adce4e
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (Section 41 handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (Section 41 handout)Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (Section 41 handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (Section 41 handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 21 handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 21 handout)Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 21 handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 21 handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximations and Differentials (handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximations and Differentials (handout)Lesson 12: Linear Approximations and Differentials (handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximations and Differentials (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Taylor Polynomials and Series
Taylor Polynomials and SeriesTaylor Polynomials and Series
Taylor Polynomials and Series
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 1: Functions
Lesson 1: FunctionsLesson 1: Functions
Lesson 1: Functions
Mel Anthony Pepito
 
Lesson 7: The Derivative (handout)
Lesson 7: The Derivative (handout)Lesson 7: The Derivative (handout)
Lesson 7: The Derivative (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Linear approximations and_differentials
Linear approximations and_differentialsLinear approximations and_differentials
Linear approximations and_differentials
Tarun Gehlot
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentation Rules (handout)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentation Rules (handout)Lesson 8: Basic Differentation Rules (handout)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentation Rules (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lecture 1
Lecture 1Lecture 1
Lecture 1
SaeedShahAhmed
 
3 handouts section3-11
3 handouts section3-113 handouts section3-11
3 handouts section3-11
International advisers
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides) Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Mel Anthony Pepito
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 10 version)
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 10 version)Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 10 version)
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 10 version)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 4 version)
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 4 version)Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 4 version)
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 4 version)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides) Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Mel Anthony Pepito
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Calculus_I_Chapter_1 (Printed version).pdf
Calculus_I_Chapter_1 (Printed version).pdfCalculus_I_Chapter_1 (Printed version).pdf
Calculus_I_Chapter_1 (Printed version).pdf
Hung227634
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 41 slides)Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 41 slides)
Mel Anthony Pepito
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation
Lesson 12: Linear ApproximationLesson 12: Linear Approximation
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation
Lesson 12: Linear ApproximationLesson 12: Linear Approximation
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation
guest27adce4e
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (Section 41 handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (Section 41 handout)Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (Section 41 handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation (Section 41 handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 21 handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 21 handout)Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 21 handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximation and Differentials (Section 21 handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 12: Linear Approximations and Differentials (handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximations and Differentials (handout)Lesson 12: Linear Approximations and Differentials (handout)
Lesson 12: Linear Approximations and Differentials (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Taylor Polynomials and Series
Taylor Polynomials and SeriesTaylor Polynomials and Series
Taylor Polynomials and Series
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 7: The Derivative (handout)
Lesson 7: The Derivative (handout)Lesson 7: The Derivative (handout)
Lesson 7: The Derivative (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Linear approximations and_differentials
Linear approximations and_differentialsLinear approximations and_differentials
Linear approximations and_differentials
Tarun Gehlot
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentation Rules (handout)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentation Rules (handout)Lesson 8: Basic Differentation Rules (handout)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentation Rules (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides) Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Mel Anthony Pepito
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 41 slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 10 version)
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 10 version)Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 10 version)
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 10 version)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 4 version)
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 4 version)Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 4 version)
Lesson 22: Optimization II (Section 4 version)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides) Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Mel Anthony Pepito
 
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Lesson 8: Basic Differentiation Rules (Section 21 slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Calculus_I_Chapter_1 (Printed version).pdf
Calculus_I_Chapter_1 (Printed version).pdfCalculus_I_Chapter_1 (Printed version).pdf
Calculus_I_Chapter_1 (Printed version).pdf
Hung227634
 
Ad

More from Matthew Leingang (20)

Making Lesson Plans
Making Lesson PlansMaking Lesson Plans
Making Lesson Plans
Matthew Leingang
 
Streamlining assessment, feedback, and archival with auto-multiple-choice
Streamlining assessment, feedback, and archival with auto-multiple-choiceStreamlining assessment, feedback, and archival with auto-multiple-choice
Streamlining assessment, feedback, and archival with auto-multiple-choice
Matthew Leingang
 
Electronic Grading of Paper Assessments
Electronic Grading of Paper AssessmentsElectronic Grading of Paper Assessments
Electronic Grading of Paper Assessments
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (handout)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (handout)Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (handout)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (handout)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (handout)Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (handout)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (handout)
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (handout)Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (handout)
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (handout)
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (handout)Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (handout)
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (slides)
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (slides)Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (slides)
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (handout)
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (handout)Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (handout)
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (slides)
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (slides)Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (slides)
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (handout)
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (handout)Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (handout)
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (slides)
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (slides)Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (slides)
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (handout)
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (handout)Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (handout)
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem (slides)
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem (slides)Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem (slides)
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 18: Maximum and Minimum Values (slides)
Lesson 18: Maximum and Minimum Values (slides)Lesson 18: Maximum and Minimum Values (slides)
Lesson 18: Maximum and Minimum Values (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 17: Indeterminate forms and l'Hôpital's Rule (slides)
Lesson 17: Indeterminate forms and l'Hôpital's Rule (slides)Lesson 17: Indeterminate forms and l'Hôpital's Rule (slides)
Lesson 17: Indeterminate forms and l'Hôpital's Rule (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Streamlining assessment, feedback, and archival with auto-multiple-choice
Streamlining assessment, feedback, and archival with auto-multiple-choiceStreamlining assessment, feedback, and archival with auto-multiple-choice
Streamlining assessment, feedback, and archival with auto-multiple-choice
Matthew Leingang
 
Electronic Grading of Paper Assessments
Electronic Grading of Paper AssessmentsElectronic Grading of Paper Assessments
Electronic Grading of Paper Assessments
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (handout)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (handout)Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (handout)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (handout)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (handout)Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (handout)
Lesson 26: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (handout)
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (handout)Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (handout)
Lesson 25: Evaluating Definite Integrals (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (handout)
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (handout)Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (handout)
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (slides)
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (slides)Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (slides)
Lesson 24: Areas and Distances, The Definite Integral (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Lesson 23: Antiderivatives (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (handout)
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (handout)Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (handout)
Lesson 22: Optimization Problems (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (slides)
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (slides)Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (slides)
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (handout)
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (handout)Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (handout)
Lesson 21: Curve Sketching (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (slides)
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (slides)Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (slides)
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (handout)
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (handout)Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (handout)
Lesson 20: Derivatives and the Shapes of Curves (handout)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem (slides)
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem (slides)Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem (slides)
Lesson 19: The Mean Value Theorem (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 18: Maximum and Minimum Values (slides)
Lesson 18: Maximum and Minimum Values (slides)Lesson 18: Maximum and Minimum Values (slides)
Lesson 18: Maximum and Minimum Values (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 
Lesson 17: Indeterminate forms and l'Hôpital's Rule (slides)
Lesson 17: Indeterminate forms and l'Hôpital's Rule (slides)Lesson 17: Indeterminate forms and l'Hôpital's Rule (slides)
Lesson 17: Indeterminate forms and l'Hôpital's Rule (slides)
Matthew Leingang
 

Recently uploaded (20)

machines-for-woodworking-shops-en-compressed.pdf
machines-for-woodworking-shops-en-compressed.pdfmachines-for-woodworking-shops-en-compressed.pdf
machines-for-woodworking-shops-en-compressed.pdf
AmirStern2
 
Building the Customer Identity Community, Together.pdf
Building the Customer Identity Community, Together.pdfBuilding the Customer Identity Community, Together.pdf
Building the Customer Identity Community, Together.pdf
Cheryl Hung
 
Shoehorning dependency injection into a FP language, what does it take?
Shoehorning dependency injection into a FP language, what does it take?Shoehorning dependency injection into a FP language, what does it take?
Shoehorning dependency injection into a FP language, what does it take?
Eric Torreborre
 
DNF 2.0 Implementations Challenges in Nepal
DNF 2.0 Implementations Challenges in NepalDNF 2.0 Implementations Challenges in Nepal
DNF 2.0 Implementations Challenges in Nepal
ICT Frame Magazine Pvt. Ltd.
 
Computer Systems Quiz Presentation in Purple Bold Style (4).pdf
Computer Systems Quiz Presentation in Purple Bold Style (4).pdfComputer Systems Quiz Presentation in Purple Bold Style (4).pdf
Computer Systems Quiz Presentation in Purple Bold Style (4).pdf
fizarcse
 
Building Connected Agents: An Overview of Google's ADK and A2A Protocol
Building Connected Agents:  An Overview of Google's ADK and A2A ProtocolBuilding Connected Agents:  An Overview of Google's ADK and A2A Protocol
Building Connected Agents: An Overview of Google's ADK and A2A Protocol
Suresh Peiris
 
Whose choice? Making decisions with and about Artificial Intelligence, Keele ...
Whose choice? Making decisions with and about Artificial Intelligence, Keele ...Whose choice? Making decisions with and about Artificial Intelligence, Keele ...
Whose choice? Making decisions with and about Artificial Intelligence, Keele ...
Alan Dix
 
Right to liberty and security of a person.pdf
Right to liberty and security of a person.pdfRight to liberty and security of a person.pdf
Right to liberty and security of a person.pdf
danielbraico197
 
Harmonizing Multi-Agent Intelligence | Open Data Science Conference | Gary Ar...
Harmonizing Multi-Agent Intelligence | Open Data Science Conference | Gary Ar...Harmonizing Multi-Agent Intelligence | Open Data Science Conference | Gary Ar...
Harmonizing Multi-Agent Intelligence | Open Data Science Conference | Gary Ar...
Gary Arora
 
Understanding SEO in the Age of AI.pdf
Understanding SEO in the Age of AI.pdfUnderstanding SEO in the Age of AI.pdf
Understanding SEO in the Age of AI.pdf
Fulcrum Concepts, LLC
 
Secondary Storage for a microcontroller system
Secondary Storage for a microcontroller systemSecondary Storage for a microcontroller system
Secondary Storage for a microcontroller system
fizarcse
 
RFID in Supply chain management and logistics.pdf
RFID in Supply chain management and logistics.pdfRFID in Supply chain management and logistics.pdf
RFID in Supply chain management and logistics.pdf
EnCStore Private Limited
 
Breaking it Down: Microservices Architecture for PHP Developers
Breaking it Down: Microservices Architecture for PHP DevelopersBreaking it Down: Microservices Architecture for PHP Developers
Breaking it Down: Microservices Architecture for PHP Developers
pmeth1
 
Google DeepMind’s New AI Coding Agent AlphaEvolve.pdf
Google DeepMind’s New AI Coding Agent AlphaEvolve.pdfGoogle DeepMind’s New AI Coding Agent AlphaEvolve.pdf
Google DeepMind’s New AI Coding Agent AlphaEvolve.pdf
derrickjswork
 
AI and Gender: Decoding the Sociological Impact
AI and Gender: Decoding the Sociological ImpactAI and Gender: Decoding the Sociological Impact
AI and Gender: Decoding the Sociological Impact
SaikatBasu37
 
In-App Guidance_ Save Enterprises Millions in Training & IT Costs.pptx
In-App Guidance_ Save Enterprises Millions in Training & IT Costs.pptxIn-App Guidance_ Save Enterprises Millions in Training & IT Costs.pptx
In-App Guidance_ Save Enterprises Millions in Training & IT Costs.pptx
aptyai
 
Scientific Large Language Models in Multi-Modal Domains
Scientific Large Language Models in Multi-Modal DomainsScientific Large Language Models in Multi-Modal Domains
Scientific Large Language Models in Multi-Modal Domains
syedanidakhader1
 
Dark Dynamism: drones, dark factories and deurbanization
Dark Dynamism: drones, dark factories and deurbanizationDark Dynamism: drones, dark factories and deurbanization
Dark Dynamism: drones, dark factories and deurbanization
Jakub Šimek
 
Crazy Incentives and How They Kill Security. How Do You Turn the Wheel?
Crazy Incentives and How They Kill Security. How Do You Turn the Wheel?Crazy Incentives and How They Kill Security. How Do You Turn the Wheel?
Crazy Incentives and How They Kill Security. How Do You Turn the Wheel?
Christian Folini
 
Accommodating Neurodiverse Users Online (Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2...
Accommodating Neurodiverse Users Online (Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2...Accommodating Neurodiverse Users Online (Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2...
Accommodating Neurodiverse Users Online (Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2...
User Vision
 
machines-for-woodworking-shops-en-compressed.pdf
machines-for-woodworking-shops-en-compressed.pdfmachines-for-woodworking-shops-en-compressed.pdf
machines-for-woodworking-shops-en-compressed.pdf
AmirStern2
 
Building the Customer Identity Community, Together.pdf
Building the Customer Identity Community, Together.pdfBuilding the Customer Identity Community, Together.pdf
Building the Customer Identity Community, Together.pdf
Cheryl Hung
 
Shoehorning dependency injection into a FP language, what does it take?
Shoehorning dependency injection into a FP language, what does it take?Shoehorning dependency injection into a FP language, what does it take?
Shoehorning dependency injection into a FP language, what does it take?
Eric Torreborre
 
Computer Systems Quiz Presentation in Purple Bold Style (4).pdf
Computer Systems Quiz Presentation in Purple Bold Style (4).pdfComputer Systems Quiz Presentation in Purple Bold Style (4).pdf
Computer Systems Quiz Presentation in Purple Bold Style (4).pdf
fizarcse
 
Building Connected Agents: An Overview of Google's ADK and A2A Protocol
Building Connected Agents:  An Overview of Google's ADK and A2A ProtocolBuilding Connected Agents:  An Overview of Google's ADK and A2A Protocol
Building Connected Agents: An Overview of Google's ADK and A2A Protocol
Suresh Peiris
 
Whose choice? Making decisions with and about Artificial Intelligence, Keele ...
Whose choice? Making decisions with and about Artificial Intelligence, Keele ...Whose choice? Making decisions with and about Artificial Intelligence, Keele ...
Whose choice? Making decisions with and about Artificial Intelligence, Keele ...
Alan Dix
 
Right to liberty and security of a person.pdf
Right to liberty and security of a person.pdfRight to liberty and security of a person.pdf
Right to liberty and security of a person.pdf
danielbraico197
 
Harmonizing Multi-Agent Intelligence | Open Data Science Conference | Gary Ar...
Harmonizing Multi-Agent Intelligence | Open Data Science Conference | Gary Ar...Harmonizing Multi-Agent Intelligence | Open Data Science Conference | Gary Ar...
Harmonizing Multi-Agent Intelligence | Open Data Science Conference | Gary Ar...
Gary Arora
 
Understanding SEO in the Age of AI.pdf
Understanding SEO in the Age of AI.pdfUnderstanding SEO in the Age of AI.pdf
Understanding SEO in the Age of AI.pdf
Fulcrum Concepts, LLC
 
Secondary Storage for a microcontroller system
Secondary Storage for a microcontroller systemSecondary Storage for a microcontroller system
Secondary Storage for a microcontroller system
fizarcse
 
RFID in Supply chain management and logistics.pdf
RFID in Supply chain management and logistics.pdfRFID in Supply chain management and logistics.pdf
RFID in Supply chain management and logistics.pdf
EnCStore Private Limited
 
Breaking it Down: Microservices Architecture for PHP Developers
Breaking it Down: Microservices Architecture for PHP DevelopersBreaking it Down: Microservices Architecture for PHP Developers
Breaking it Down: Microservices Architecture for PHP Developers
pmeth1
 
Google DeepMind’s New AI Coding Agent AlphaEvolve.pdf
Google DeepMind’s New AI Coding Agent AlphaEvolve.pdfGoogle DeepMind’s New AI Coding Agent AlphaEvolve.pdf
Google DeepMind’s New AI Coding Agent AlphaEvolve.pdf
derrickjswork
 
AI and Gender: Decoding the Sociological Impact
AI and Gender: Decoding the Sociological ImpactAI and Gender: Decoding the Sociological Impact
AI and Gender: Decoding the Sociological Impact
SaikatBasu37
 
In-App Guidance_ Save Enterprises Millions in Training & IT Costs.pptx
In-App Guidance_ Save Enterprises Millions in Training & IT Costs.pptxIn-App Guidance_ Save Enterprises Millions in Training & IT Costs.pptx
In-App Guidance_ Save Enterprises Millions in Training & IT Costs.pptx
aptyai
 
Scientific Large Language Models in Multi-Modal Domains
Scientific Large Language Models in Multi-Modal DomainsScientific Large Language Models in Multi-Modal Domains
Scientific Large Language Models in Multi-Modal Domains
syedanidakhader1
 
Dark Dynamism: drones, dark factories and deurbanization
Dark Dynamism: drones, dark factories and deurbanizationDark Dynamism: drones, dark factories and deurbanization
Dark Dynamism: drones, dark factories and deurbanization
Jakub Šimek
 
Crazy Incentives and How They Kill Security. How Do You Turn the Wheel?
Crazy Incentives and How They Kill Security. How Do You Turn the Wheel?Crazy Incentives and How They Kill Security. How Do You Turn the Wheel?
Crazy Incentives and How They Kill Security. How Do You Turn the Wheel?
Christian Folini
 
Accommodating Neurodiverse Users Online (Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2...
Accommodating Neurodiverse Users Online (Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2...Accommodating Neurodiverse Users Online (Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2...
Accommodating Neurodiverse Users Online (Global Accessibility Awareness Day 2...
User Vision
 

Lesson 12: Linear Approximation

  • 1. Section 2.8 Linear Approximation and Differentials V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I New York University May 26, 2010 Announcements Quiz 2 Thursday on Sections 1.5–2.5 No class Monday, May 31 Assignment 2 due Tuesday, June 1 . . . . . .
  • 2. Announcements Quiz 2 Thursday on Sections 1.5–2.5 No class Monday, May 31 Assignment 2 due Tuesday, June 1 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 2 / 27
  • 3. Objectives Use tangent lines to make linear approximations to a function. Given a function and a point in the domain, compute the linearization of the function at that point. Use linearization to approximate values of functions Given a function, compute the differential of that function Use the differential notation to estimate error in linear approximations. . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 3 / 27
  • 4. Outline The linear approximation of a function near a point Examples Questions Differentials Using differentials to estimate error Advanced Examples . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 4 / 27
  • 5. The Big Idea Question Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f near a? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 5 / 27
  • 6. The Big Idea Question Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f near a? Answer The tangent line, of course! . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 5 / 27
  • 7. The Big Idea Question Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f near a? Answer The tangent line, of course! Question What is the equation for the line tangent to y = f(x) at (a, f(a))? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 5 / 27
  • 8. The Big Idea Question Let f be differentiable at a. What linear function best approximates f near a? Answer The tangent line, of course! Question What is the equation for the line tangent to y = f(x) at (a, f(a))? Answer L(x) = f(a) + f′ (a)(x − a) . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 5 / 27
  • 9. The tangent line is a linear approximation y . L(x) = f(a) + f′ (a)(x − a) is a decent approximation to f L . (x) . near a. f .(x) . f .(a) . . x−a . x . a . x . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 6 / 27
  • 10. The tangent line is a linear approximation y . L(x) = f(a) + f′ (a)(x − a) is a decent approximation to f L . (x) . near a. f .(x) . How decent? The closer x is to a, the better the approxmation f .(a) . . x−a L(x) is to f(x) . x . a . x . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 6 / 27
  • 11. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 12. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 and f′ (0) = 1. So the linear approximation near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. Thus ( ) 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 180 180 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 13. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = . 3 So the linear approximation near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. Thus ( ) 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 180 180 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 14. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) √ 3 We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 2 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = . 3 So the linear approximation near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. Thus ( ) 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 180 180 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 15. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) √ 3 We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 2 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = 1 . 3 2 So the linear approximation near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. Thus ( ) 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 180 180 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 16. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) √ 3 We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 2 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = 1 . 3 2 So the linear approximation So L(x) = near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. Thus ( ) 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 180 180 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 17. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) √ 3 We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 2 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = 1 . 3 2 √ So the linear approximation 3 1( π) So L(x) = + x− near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. 2 2 3 Thus ( ) 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 180 180 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 18. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) √ 3 We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 2 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = 1 . 3 2 √ So the linear approximation 3 1( π) So L(x) = + x− near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. 2 2 3 Thus Thus ( ) ( ) 61π 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 sin ≈ 180 180 180 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 19. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) √ 3 We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 2 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = 1 . 3 2 √ So the linear approximation 3 1( π) So L(x) = + x− near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. 2 2 3 Thus Thus ( ) ( ) 61π 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 sin ≈ 0.87475 180 180 180 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 20. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) √ 3 We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 2 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = 1 . 3 2 √ So the linear approximation 3 1( π) So L(x) = + x− near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. 2 2 3 Thus Thus ( ) ( ) 61π 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 sin ≈ 0.87475 180 180 180 Calculator check: sin(61◦ ) ≈ . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 21. Example . Example Estimate sin(61◦ ) = sin(61π/180) by using a linear approximation (i) about a = 0 (ii) about a = 60◦ = π/3. Solution (i) Solution (ii) (π) √ 3 We have f = and If f(x) = sin x, then f(0) = 0 ( ) 3 2 and f′ (0) = 1. f′ π = 1 . 3 2 √ So the linear approximation 3 1( π) So L(x) = + x− near 0 is L(x) = 0 + 1 · x = x. 2 2 3 Thus Thus ( ) ( ) 61π 61π 61π sin ≈ ≈ 1.06465 sin ≈ 0.87475 180 180 180 Calculator check: sin(61◦ ) ≈ 0.87462. . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 7 / 27
  • 22. Illustration y . y . = sin x . x . . 1◦ 6 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
  • 23. Illustration y . y . = L1 (x) = x y . = sin x . x . 0 . . 1◦ 6 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
  • 24. Illustration y . y . = L1 (x) = x b . ig difference! y . = sin x . x . 0 . . 1◦ 6 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
  • 25. Illustration y . y . = L1 (x) = x √ ( ) y . = L2 (x) = 2 3 + 1 2 x− π 3 y . = sin x . . . x . 0 . . π/3 . 1◦ 6 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
  • 26. Illustration y . y . = L1 (x) = x √ ( ) y . = L2 (x) = 2 3 + 1 2 x− π 3 y . = sin x . . ery little difference! v . . x . 0 . . π/3 . 1◦ 6 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 8 / 27
  • 27. Another Example Example √ Estimate 10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1. . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
  • 28. Another Example Example √ Estimate 10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1. Solution √ The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) = √ x near a = 9 to estimate f(10) = 10. . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
  • 29. Another Example Example √ Estimate 10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1. Solution √ The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) = √ x near a = 9 to estimate f(10) = 10. √ √ d√ 10 ≈ 9 + x (1) dx x=9 1 19 =3+ (1) = ≈ 3.167 2·3 6 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
  • 30. Another Example Example √ Estimate 10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1. Solution √ The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) = √ x near a = 9 to estimate f(10) = 10. √ √ d√ 10 ≈ 9 + x (1) dx x=9 1 19 =3+ (1) = ≈ 3.167 2·3 6 ( )2 19 Check: = 6 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
  • 31. Another Example Example √ Estimate 10 using the fact that 10 = 9 + 1. Solution √ The key step is to use a linear approximation to f(x) = √ x near a = 9 to estimate f(10) = 10. √ √ d√ 10 ≈ 9 + x (1) dx x=9 1 19 =3+ (1) = ≈ 3.167 2·3 6 ( )2 19 361 Check: = . 6 36 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 9 / 27
  • 32. Dividing without dividing? Example Suppose I have an irrational fear of division and need to estimate 577 ÷ 408. I write 577 1 1 1 = 1 + 169 = 1 + 169 × × . 408 408 4 102 1 But still I have to find . 102 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 10 / 27
  • 33. Dividing without dividing? Example Suppose I have an irrational fear of division and need to estimate 577 ÷ 408. I write 577 1 1 1 = 1 + 169 = 1 + 169 × × . 408 408 4 102 1 But still I have to find . 102 Solution 1 Let f(x) = . We know f(100) and we want to estimate f(102). x 1 1 f(102) ≈ f(100) + f′ (100)(2) = − (2) = 0.0098 100 1002 577 =⇒ ≈ 1.41405 408 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 10 / 27
  • 34. Questions Example Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr. How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 11 / 27
  • 35. Answers Example Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr. How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 12 / 27
  • 36. Answers Example Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr. How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight? Answer 100 mi 150 mi 600 mi (?) (Is it reasonable to assume 12 hours at the same speed?) . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 12 / 27
  • 37. Questions Example Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr. How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight? Example Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more lots? 12 more lots? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 13 / 27
  • 38. Answers Example Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more lots? 12 more lots? Answer $100 $150 $600 (?) . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 14 / 27
  • 39. Questions Example Suppose we are traveling in a car and at noon our speed is 50 mi/hr. How far will we have traveled by 2:00pm? by 3:00pm? By midnight? Example Suppose our factory makes MP3 players and the marginal cost is currently $50/lot. How much will it cost to make 2 more lots? 3 more lots? 12 more lots? Example Suppose a line goes through the point (x0 , y0 ) and has slope m. If the point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the corresponding vertical movement? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 15 / 27
  • 40. Answers Example Suppose a line goes through the point (x0 , y0 ) and has slope m. If the point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the corresponding vertical movement? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 16 / 27
  • 41. Answers Example Suppose a line goes through the point (x0 , y0 ) and has slope m. If the point is moved horizontally by dx, while staying on the line, what is the corresponding vertical movement? Answer The slope of the line is rise m= run We are given a “run” of dx, so the corresponding “rise” is m dx. . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 16 / 27
  • 42. Outline The linear approximation of a function near a point Examples Questions Differentials Using differentials to estimate error Advanced Examples . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 17 / 27
  • 43. Differentials are another way to express derivatives f(x + ∆x) − f(x) ≈ f′ (x) ∆x y . ∆y dy Rename ∆x = dx, so we can write this as . ∆y ≈ dy = f′ (x)dx. . dy . ∆y And this looks a lot like the . . dx = ∆x Leibniz-Newton identity dy . = f′ (x) x . dx x x . . + ∆x . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 18 / 27
  • 44. Differentials are another way to express derivatives f(x + ∆x) − f(x) ≈ f′ (x) ∆x y . ∆y dy Rename ∆x = dx, so we can write this as . ∆y ≈ dy = f′ (x)dx. . dy . ∆y And this looks a lot like the . . dx = ∆x Leibniz-Newton identity dy . = f′ (x) x . dx x x . . + ∆x Linear approximation means ∆y ≈ dy = f′ (x0 ) dx near x0 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 18 / 27
  • 45. Using differentials to estimate error y . If y = f(x), x0 and ∆x is known, and an estimate of ∆y is desired: Approximate: ∆y ≈ dy . Differentiate: dy = f′ (x) dx . ∆y . dy Evaluate at x = x0 and . . dx = ∆x dx = ∆x. . x . x x . . + ∆x . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 19 / 27
  • 46. Example A sheet of plywood measures 8 ft × 4 ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the area of the sheet be off by? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 20 / 27
  • 47. Example A sheet of plywood measures 8 ft × 4 ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the area of the sheet be off by? Solution 1 2 Write A(ℓ) = ℓ . We want to know ∆A when ℓ = 8 ft and ∆ℓ = 1 in. 2 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 20 / 27
  • 48. Example A sheet of plywood measures 8 ft × 4 ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the area of the sheet be off by? Solution 1 2 Write A(ℓ) = ℓ . We want to know ∆A when ℓ = 8 ft and ∆ℓ = 1 in. 2 ( ) 97 9409 9409 (I) A(ℓ + ∆ℓ) = A = So ∆A = − 32 ≈ 0.6701. 12 288 288 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 20 / 27
  • 49. Example A sheet of plywood measures 8 ft × 4 ft. Suppose our plywood-cutting machine will cut a rectangle whose width is exactly half its length, but the length is prone to errors. If the length is off by 1 in, how bad can the area of the sheet be off by? Solution 1 2 Write A(ℓ) = ℓ . We want to know ∆A when ℓ = 8 ft and ∆ℓ = 1 in. 2 ( ) 97 9409 9409 (I) A(ℓ + ∆ℓ) = A = So ∆A = − 32 ≈ 0.6701. 12 288 288 dA (II) = ℓ, so dA = ℓ dℓ, which should be a good estimate for ∆ℓ. dℓ When ℓ = 8 and dℓ = 12 , we have dA = 12 = 2 ≈ 0.667. So we 1 8 3 get estimates close to the hundredth of a square foot. . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 20 / 27
  • 50. Why? Why use linear approximations dy when the actual difference ∆y is known? Linear approximation is quick and reliable. Finding ∆y exactly depends on the function. These examples are overly simple. See the “Advanced Examples” later. In real life, sometimes only f(a) and f′ (a) are known, and not the general f(x). . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 21 / 27
  • 51. Outline The linear approximation of a function near a point Examples Questions Differentials Using differentials to estimate error Advanced Examples . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 22 / 27
  • 52. Gravitation Pencils down! Example Drop a 1 kg ball off the roof of the Silver Center (50m high). We usually say that a falling object feels a force F = −mg from gravity. . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 23 / 27
  • 53. Gravitation Pencils down! Example Drop a 1 kg ball off the roof of the Silver Center (50m high). We usually say that a falling object feels a force F = −mg from gravity. In fact, the force felt is GMm F(r) = − , r2 where M is the mass of the earth and r is the distance from the center of the earth to the object. G is a constant. GMm At r = re the force really is F(re ) = = −mg. r2 e What is the maximum error in replacing the actual force felt at the top of the building F(re + ∆r) by the force felt at ground level F(re )? The relative error? The percentage error? . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 23 / 27
  • 54. Gravitation Solution Solution We wonder if ∆F = F(re + ∆r) − F(re ) is small. Using a linear approximation, dF GMm ∆F ≈ dF = dr = 2 3 dr dr re re ( ) GMm dr ∆r = 2 = 2mg re re re ∆F ∆r The relative error is ≈ −2 F re re = 6378.1 km. If ∆r = 50 m, ∆F ∆r 50 ≈ −2 = −2 = −1.56 × 10−5 = −0.00156% F re 6378100 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 24 / 27
  • 55. Systematic linear approximation √ √ 2 is irrational, but 9/4 is rational and 9/4 is close to 2. . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 25 / 27
  • 56. Systematic linear approximation √ √ 2 is irrational, but 9/4 is rational and 9/4 is close to 2. So √ √ √ 1 17 2 = 9/4 − 1/4 ≈ 9/4 + (−1/4) = 2(3/2) 12 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 25 / 27
  • 57. Systematic linear approximation √ √ 2 is irrational, but 9/4 is rational and 9/4 is close to 2. So √ √ √ 1 17 2 = 9/4 − 1/4 ≈ 9/4 + (−1/4) = 2(3/2) 12 This is a better approximation since (17/12)2 = 289/144 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 25 / 27
  • 58. Systematic linear approximation √ √ 2 is irrational, but 9/4 is rational and 9/4 is close to 2. So √ √ √ 1 17 2 = 9/4 − 1/4 ≈ 9/4 + (−1/4) = 2(3/2) 12 This is a better approximation since (17/12)2 = 289/144 Do it again! √ √ √ 1 2 = 289/144 − 1/144 ≈ 289/144 + (−1/144) = 577/408 2(17/12) ( )2 577 332, 929 1 Now = which is away from 2. 408 166, 464 166, 464 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 25 / 27
  • 59. Illustration of the previous example . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 60. Illustration of the previous example . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 61. Illustration of the previous example . 2 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 62. Illustration of the previous example . . 2 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 63. Illustration of the previous example . . 2 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 64. Illustration of the previous example . 2, 17 ) ( 12 . . . 2 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 65. Illustration of the previous example . 2, 17 ) ( 12 . . . 2 . . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 66. Illustration of the previous example . . 2, 17/12) ( . . 4, 3) (9 2 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 67. Illustration of the previous example . . 2, 17/12) ( .. ( . 9, 3) ( )4 2 289 17 . 144 , 12 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 68. Illustration of the previous example . . 2, 17/12) ( .. ( . 9, 3) ( ( 577 ) )4 2 . 2, 408 289 17 . 144 , 12 . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 26 / 27
  • 69. Summary Linear approximation: If f is differentiable at a, the best linear approximation to f near a is given by Lf,a (x) = f(a) + f′ (a)(x − a) Differentials: If f is differentiable at x, a good approximation to ∆y = f(x + ∆x) − f(x) is dy dy ∆y ≈ dy = · dx = · ∆x dx dx Don’t buy plywood from me. . . . . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 2.8 Linear Approximation May 26, 2010 27 / 27
  翻译: