Why Your Python Logger Might Be Playing Hard to Get (And How We Made It Work)
Why Your Python Logger Might Be Playing Hard to Get (And How We Made It Work)
The Quest for the Elusive Logs
As Python developers, we've all been there: you set up logging, you expect it to work, and then... nothing. No logs in your console. No helpful debug messages. It’s like your logger has decided to go on vacation. 😤
But don't worry, dear reader. Today, we’re going to walk you through the epic saga of troubleshooting logging issues, and how we turned a silent logger into a chatty, verbose champion.
The Problem: The Mysterious Case of the Invisible Logs
So there we were, just trying to log some information with Python’s built-in logging module and structlog (for those shiny structured logs). We fired up our logger with the hope of getting some valuable output, only to find… silence.
We had set up everything—environment variables, log levels, handlers, the works. But for some reason, our log messages were nowhere to be found.
We dug into the code and found the culprit: the log level was printing as 0—a mysterious NOTSET. If the log level is 0, the logger is essentially a lazy couch potato that doesn't want to do anything. No logs, no effort. 🛋️
What Went Wrong?
Let's break down what went wrong, and why our logger wasn't being cooperative:
The Solution: Making the Logger Work Harder
At this point, we knew what needed to be done: a little nudge to get the logger back on track.
The Code That Saved the Day
Here’s what the final code looked like after we made the necessary adjustments:
import logging
import sys
import structlog
import os
def get_logger():
# Fetch log level from environment, default to INFO if not set
log_level = os.environ.get("LOG_LEVEL", "INFO").upper()
# Ensure log level is valid
try:
log_level = getattr(logging, log_level)
except AttributeError:
log_level = logging.INFO # Default to INFO if invalid log level
# Set up logging configuration
logging.basicConfig(
level=log_level,
stream=sys.stdout, # Ensure output to stdout
format="%(message)s" # Simplify format for testing
)
# Get the logger
base_logger = logging.getLogger("ingestit")
# Print logger level to debug if it's being set correctly
print(f"Logger level (before setLevel): {base_logger.level}")
# Explicitly set the log level for this logger
base_logger.setLevel(log_level)
# Print logger level after setting it explicitly (for debugging)
print(f"Logger level (after setLevel): {base_logger.level}")
# Add a handler if none exists (to avoid duplicate handlers)
if not base_logger.handlers:
handler = logging.StreamHandler(sys.stdout)
handler.setFormatter(logging.Formatter("%(message)s"))
base_logger.addHandler(handler)
# Wrap logger with structlog
logger = structlog.wrap_logger(
base_logger,
processors=[
structlog.stdlib.add_log_level,
structlog.processors.TimeStamper(fmt="iso"),
structlog.dev.ConsoleRenderer(colors=True) # Simplified for debugging
],
wrapper_class=structlog.stdlib.BoundLogger,
)
logger.info("Logger initialized successfully!")
return logger
The Outcome: Logging Triumph!
With these changes in place, our logger was no longer a lazy couch potato. 🎉 It was hard at work, logging messages to the console, and giving us all the insights we needed.
Here’s what we saw when we tested it:
logger = get_logger()
logger.info("This is a test log message.")
Expected output: A well-structured log message with timestamps and log levels, right in our terminal. ✨
Key Takeaways:
In Conclusion...
If your Python logger ever starts acting like a hermit and refusing to share anything, don’t despair. Armed with a little debugging and the right settings, you too can have a verbose and talkative logger. After all, it’s much easier to debug when you can actually see what’s going on.
Now go forth, and log with confidence! ✌️