What in the end does IoT bring?

What in the end does IoT bring?

I was thinking yesterday about cloud, the IoT and of course my three favorite concepts (bandwidth, integration and data). First off the reality of IoT is that it for the most part requires a cloud infrastructure. But like cloud there are components of the IoT that create different solution sets.

For example in the reality of IaaS, PaaS and SaaS, each for the most part relies on the other, except for IaaS. PaaS and SaaS are linked to having a stable and reasonable IaaS infrastructure both the hardware and software of that environment.

Cloud and the IaaS baseline represents a great starting point for the IoT world as well. It makes me wonder if in fact IoT is PaaS v2. Where IaaS is about building and offering infrastructure PaaS is about integration and connection. IoT is simply integration and connection carried beyond human controlled objects to autonomous machines. A good video surveillance system works with or without human intervention.

Within that PaaS environment we should be able to establish some interconnection and integration rules for the IoT that are logical. In effect an IoT sensor is similar to the old three tiered applications we built 15 years ago. A transmission layer, A data layer and a presentation layer. The n-tier environment in which the IoT objects are deployed then represents the place where we can create the interconnection and integration frameworks.

First off we would need to establish the requirements of the overall solution. Not all data needs to be integrated and connected. Some data can simply go to the presentation layer and be consumed by the user. Weather data for the most part is consumed as real time data. You don’t often sit down on a Sunday afternoon and review your home weather station data from the past week. Video data on the other hand you might. Most video surveillance systems have motion detection options. So you can review any event created by motion related to your system. It may still be a lot (people walking their dogs, kids on the way to school) but it is fewer events and in the end you can sort through 24 hours fairly fast. But you would need those files to exist in your system.

In both the cases stated above we wouldn’t need to integrate with anything. Simply have a system that would support local video DVR capabilities and a way to access the DVR. There are however solutions that would benefit from data analytics. The first would be the actual “atmosphere” of your home. Over time CO2 levels rise and decline in your home. When the levels are high you get a headache or worse. But why are the levels high? When are the level’s high? That is information that you need to be able to collect (via a sensor installed in your home) and then over time model. Data analytics will allow you to examine the rise and fall of Co2 in your house and determine the high points and low points.

Once you have the high and low points you can then use analytics to determine is there a trend. IE if your high point is always the same time every day what activity is occurring at that time that is changing the levels in your house. Many weather stations now capture the CO2 levels in your home. Some store them for initial analysis but the point of integration would be that system to a broader data analysis system that would allow you to analyze events over time (change over time as well).

In the end I think my proposal is that the IoT is actually a PaaS layer that has three distinct components to it:

  • Bandwidth
  • Integration
  • Data

Bandwidth is both a limiter (more data than available pipe) and an enabler (real time connectivity is available). Integration isn’t always required. Sometimes data can be real time and not require analysis or modification and finally the data itself. Data either needs to be stored and used later, consumed real-time or a combination of both.

If we take this concept and apply it to the real world would it work?

The first and perhaps the one that should be set-up the quickest is the car ride service Uber. Hail a ride, which is very cool but then be able to connect to the sensor in the car and see what that driver has been and does do. It removes the potential risk of thieves as Uber drivers. It gives you an assured Uber experience. (once you connect to the drivers in the Uber application, they would simply route the onboard sensor from that car to you. They could offer 30 minutes or more of video shot with time stamps).

City government could use the IoT (as I talked about in one of the sections of my book The Syncverse) to provide tourism data. Visiting Chicago? The city of Chicago offers an IoT feed from many of its wonderful landmarks. The top of the Sears Tower (I know its not the Sears tower anymore – but I refuse to call it anything but the Sears tower). See Chicago and then travel there and enjoy the sites in person.

For football, basketball and other sports fans sell the IoT experience. Losing people in the seats? Charge $20 for IoT access to the game. You pick the sidelines. Or you pick the camera you are connected to. Experience the game unlike any other remote fan!

Jibo and Keecker already are well down this next path – experience remote family events. Using the device you are able to control it, moving around the room with ease or pivoting the camera so that you can see, and be seen anywhere in the room.

The potential market for leveraging IoT is impressive. You could effectively sell a more personalized experience for anyone interested. It becomes the way to be more into the game than you would be otherwise.

Of course there are things that could go wrong in a system like this. But it would decrease the risk for most people. It wouldn’t however deal with the broader impact of the IoT. The television show Person of Interest does a good job of exposing the what could go wrong side of that.

What in the end happens if the wrong people gain control of a series of IoT sensors?

As stated Person of Interest portrays a dark vision of what could happen. Personally I am not sure we have an AI capable today of churning through 1,000,000 video feeds and identifying not only something happening or the probability of something happening but also being able to effectively think a way out of the problem.

A system like that may be in development but for now we can enjoy the fiction. The IoT revolution will give us a chance to change the world and broaden the experiences of everyone in the world.

Scott Andersen

Distinguished Solution Architect Verizon

10y

Nurudeen Popoola It is always possible that automation will reduce the workforce but let's hope it makes new, better jobs as well.

Like
Reply
Nurudeen A. Popoola

CIO | Head of IT & Digital Innovation | CTO | Digital Transformational Leader | Career Coach | ERP Consultant | Strategic Business Leader

10y

IoT may certainly bring more than what have been predicted - Government, organizations, start-ups, and individuals will have their own share of it - and possibly take away many people jobs than what it will create.

Like
Reply
Scott Andersen

Distinguished Solution Architect Verizon

10y

George Chiesa in fact it would and people would be amazed at what happens today. Simply trolling IoT on Kickstarter and Indiegogo provides a really cool window of what may yet be...

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Scott Andersen

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics