We Built a Digital Hell. Let’s Not Drag the Beta Generation Into It

We Built a Digital Hell. Let’s Not Drag the Beta Generation Into It

Social media wasn’t supposed to become this. It began as a way for people to connect over shared interests and stay in touch with friends. In its early days, it was a tool for reunions and sharing memories. But what started as connection soon became consumption. The promise to connect with loved ones, share ideas, and build communities mutated along the way. Likes replaced conversations, followers became currency, and algorithms turned engagement into a game we’re all losing. Now, with the Beta Generation—those born from 2025 onward—poised to inherit this digital chaos, we’re at a crossroads. Will we finally confront the mess we’ve created, or will we drag yet another generation into the inferno?

Let’s not sugarcoat it: we failed Gen Z. They were the guinea pigs for the “likes” economy, where validation came in numerical form and self-worth was measured by follower counts. Then came Gen Alpha, subjected to the dominance of trends—superficial, fleeting, and often harmful. The result? A generation tethered to screens, chasing fleeting dopamine hits from algorithms that couldn’t care less about their well-being. Now, the Beta Generation stands at the edge of this digital wasteland, waiting to see if we’ve learned anything at all.

The question is urgent, the stakes immense. Will we break the cycle, or will we continue to let Big Tech, marketers, and brands prioritize profit over people? It’s time for a reckoning—a moment to pause and take responsibility before it’s too late.

From Connection to Crisis: The Evolution of Digital Chaos

Phase 1: Connection

In the beginning, social media was a digital utopia. It promised connection in its purest form—a way to bridge distances, foster relationships, and democratize information. Platforms like Facebook and Twitter were hailed as tools for empowerment, heralding a new age of global community. But utopias rarely last.

Phase 2: Quantitative Validation

The shift came quietly, but its impact was seismic. As platforms grew, so did their reliance on engagement metrics to drive growth. Likes, shares, and followers became the new currency, and users were quick to adapt. For Gen Z, this era was a trap—one where self-worth was tied to numbers on a screen. Studies reveal that teens who spent more than three hours daily on social media were twice as likely to experience depression and anxiety symptoms compared to their peers [1].

Likes, shares, and followers became the new currency, and users were quick to adapt.

This obsession with validation bred a culture of comparison, where the “highlight reels” of others became the benchmark for happiness and success. Instead of connecting, we began competing—not for genuine relationships, but for digital applause.

Phase 3: Qualitative Vanity Metrics

If Gen Z lived through the quantitative validation era, Gen Alpha is grappling with its sinister successor: qualitative vanity metrics. Now, it’s not just about how many likes you get, but what kind of content you create. Shallow trends, sensational narratives, and polarizing topics dominate platforms.

Teens today spend an average of 4.8 hours daily on social media, with 37% exceeding five hours [2]. But what are they consuming? Dangerous challenges like the “blackout challenge” that have resulted in tragic deaths. Trends promoting unrealistic beauty standards, encouraging harmful diets, and fueling body dysmorphia. Superficial "self-help" reels offering toxic positivity while masking real issues. Polarizing opinions that force users into echo chambers, making them feel like outcasts if they dare to disagree. This barrage of curated content doesn’t just entertain; it pressures users to conform or risk being ostracized.

This is the era where the quality of content has become a new metric—but not in the way we hoped.

The New Vanity: Shallow Trends and Dangerous Algorithms

Shallow Content & Dangerous Trends

Social media’s algorithms are designed to maximize engagement, but in doing so, they’ve amplified some of the worst aspects of human behavior. Shallow content thrives because it’s easy to consume and share. But it’s not harmless. In 2020, hate speech among teens on social media spiked by 70%, highlighting how these platforms have become breeding grounds for toxicity [3].

Trends that dominate social media are often superficial at best and harmful at worst. Challenges encouraging risky behavior, viral misinformation, and sensationalized “news” flood feeds, creating an environment that prioritizes clicks over critical thought.

Mental Health Impacts on Youth

The cost of these trends is staggering. For teenagers and pre-teens, the pressure to engage with these narratives often leads to severe mental health consequences. Studies show that 10% of teens with the highest social media use expressed suicidal intent or self-harm in the past year—double the rate of their less-connected peers [2].

The toll isn’t just individual; it’s generational.

The toll isn’t just individual; it’s generational. As these mental health crises compound, they ripple outward, affecting families, communities, and the very fabric of society.

Algorithmic Amplification

The algorithms that power platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube aren’t neutral. They’re designed to keep users engaged, often by amplifying polarizing or harmful content. A University College London study found that misogynistic content on TikTok’s “For You” page increased fourfold over five days, rising from 13% to 56% of recommended videos [4].

These algorithms are not merely reflecting societal issues; they’re exacerbating them, creating echo chambers where harmful ideas thrive and spread at an alarming rate. This amplification doesn’t just worsen societal divides; it magnifies mental health challenges already burdening teens and pre-teens, trapping them in cycles of negativity and isolation. It’s a dangerous feedback loop—one that the Beta Generation is set to inherit unless we act now.

Beta Generation: Are We Going to Ruin Them Too?

The Beta Generation, born from 2025 onward, will grow up in a world unlike any before it. Fully shaped by AI, automation, and an omnipresent digital culture, this generation won’t just experience technology; it will live and breathe it. Imagine classrooms where AI tutors personalize lessons in real time, homes where smart devices anticipate needs before they’re voiced, and workplaces where automation dictates the pace of productivity. Mark McCrindle, a renowned demographer, states, “Sustainability will not just be a preference but an expectation for Generation Beta” [5]. But how will this expectation flourish when the digital environment they’re inheriting is anything but sustainable?

Gen Alpha was forced to navigate the shallow, trend-obsessed waters of superficial content, from dangerous viral challenges to relentless influencer culture that glorifies unattainable lifestyles.

Let’s reflect on our track record. Gen Z endured the validation era, where self-worth was dictated by likes and shares, leading to widespread anxiety and depression as they constantly compared themselves to others online. Gen Alpha was forced to navigate the shallow, trend-obsessed waters of superficial content, from dangerous viral challenges to relentless influencer culture that glorifies unattainable lifestyles. And now? The Beta Generation stands at the precipice of inheriting these compounded crises. The question isn’t just whether we’ll let this continue but whether we have the courage to stop it.

This moment calls for responsibility. Will Big Tech, marketers, and brands take meaningful steps to shift the digital landscape, or will they keep feeding the fire? The Beta Generation deserves better—a future where innovation uplifts humanity instead of exploiting it. But first, we must ask ourselves: Are we ready to make the hard choices required to change?

Big Tech and Brands: When Will You Stop Feeding the Fire?

Big Tech

Big Tech holds the lion’s share of responsibility. Engagement-driven algorithms don’t just reflect societal biases—they amplify them. Research shows these algorithms prioritize sensational, polarizing, and often harmful content over neutral or health-promoting material [6]. This isn’t accidental; it’s by design. Keeping users glued to their screens is profitable, but at what cost?

It’s Big Tech that decides what content we see, creating a feedback loop where controversy and outrage dominate. Consider the proliferation of misinformation during the pandemic, where algorithms boosted conspiracy theories over factual information. Or the rise of echo chambers, where users are fed content that reinforces biases, leading to greater division and hostility. These platforms don’t just enable harmful trends—they actively cultivate them.

Big Tech must invest in ethical algorithm design and enforce stricter monitoring of harmful content. The goal should no longer be maximizing engagement but safeguarding user well-being. This isn’t just a moral imperative; it’s a necessity for the sustainability of these platforms.

Brands

Brands, too, play a pivotal role. Many have willingly jumped on the bandwagon, exploiting harmful trends for quick wins in engagement. Remember campaigns like Victoria’s Secret’s outdated “Perfect Body” messaging, which glorified unhealthy body standards, or fast fashion brands like Shein, whose environmental irresponsibility and exploitative practices are often masked by viral hashtag campaigns? This isn’t just tone-deaf—it’s reckless.

Brands must recognize that their influence extends beyond products; they shape culture. When brands promote shallow trends, they reinforce the very ecosystem that drives anxiety and dissatisfaction. It’s time for brands to embrace socially responsible campaigns that prioritize authenticity and value over virality. Real change comes from standing against harmful norms, even when it’s not the most profitable route in the short term.

Marketers

Marketers are the architects of the narratives that shape digital culture. They are the ones crafting the messages that either inspire or harm. Consider the use of manipulative tactics to exploit FOMO (fear of missing out), turning users into compulsive consumers. Or the over-reliance on influencer partnerships that promote unattainable lifestyles.

Authenticity and meaningful engagement must replace clickbait and superficiality.

Marketers must advocate for campaigns that challenge the toxic status quo. Authenticity and meaningful engagement must replace clickbait and superficiality. Marketers have the power to influence not just consumer behavior but the very fabric of online interactions. They must push brands to be better, to demand platforms evolve, and to foster a digital space where users thrive instead of languish. The question is: Will they use it?

How to Break the Cycle: A Digital Survival Plan

For Big Tech:

  1. Redesign Algorithms: Shift priorities from engagement to well-being by promoting diverse, positive, and informative content.
  2. Enforce Accountability: Implement stricter policies against harmful or misleading content. Transparency in content moderation practices is essential.
  3. Invest in Ethical AI: Develop technology that prioritizes humanity over profits.

For Brands:

  1. Champion Long-Term Value: Create campaigns that focus on sustainability, inclusivity, and authenticity.
  2. Lead by Example: Set industry standards by avoiding harmful trends and prioritizing positive social impact.
  3. Engage Responsibly: Encourage conversations that add value rather than sensationalize.

For Marketers:

  1. Focus on Authenticity: Build narratives that resonate deeply and genuinely with audiences.
  2. Educate Clients: Guide brands toward sustainable and meaningful campaigns instead of chasing vanity metrics.
  3. Redefine Success: Shift focus from virality to meaningful, long-term impact.

These steps may seem ambitious, but they are necessary. Without them, the Beta Generation will inherit an even more broken system than the one we’ve already allowed to fester. Change is not just possible; it’s overdue.

Parents and Educators: The Last Line of Defense

While Big Tech, brands, and marketers hold significant responsibility, parents and educators are often the frontline defenders against the worst digital influences. They are the ones tasked with preparing the Beta Generation for a world where technology is not just a tool but an environment they live in.

Parents need to become proactive stewards of their children’s digital lives. This means more than just setting screen time limits. It involves educating children about the risks of harmful content, algorithms, and the dangers of trends designed to exploit their insecurities. Conversations about digital literacy must be normalized at home, teaching kids to question the content they consume and the motivations behind it.

Educators, too, play a critical role. Schools must go beyond teaching traditional subjects and integrate digital literacy programs into their curriculums. These programs should focus on how algorithms work, the importance of mental health in the digital age, and how to critically evaluate online information. Imagine a generation armed with the tools to navigate the digital world confidently and critically—a generation that knows how to challenge harmful norms instead of succumbing to them.

Actionable Advice for Parents and Educators

  1. Educate About Algorithms: Explain how content is curated and why platforms promote certain types of posts.
  2. Encourage Critical Thinking: Teach children to question what they see online and to identify manipulative or harmful content.
  3. Promote Healthy Screen Habits: Set boundaries for device use, encourage breaks, and model balanced behavior.
  4. Advocate for Digital Literacy: Push for schools to implement robust programs that equip students with the skills to thrive online.

If parents and educators step up, they can become the anchors in an otherwise turbulent digital storm. But this requires effort, consistency, and a willingness to engage deeply with the realities of today’s digital culture.

Let’s Not Drag Them Into This Mess: A Call to Action

The Beta Generation’s future isn’t set in stone. It is shaped by the choices we make today. If we continue to let harmful trends, exploitative algorithms, and reckless marketing define the digital ecosystem, we will have failed them just as we did with Gen Z and Gen Alpha.

Khangarot, an expert on Generation Beta, notes, “Living in an era of global challenges might foster problem-solving mindsets but also amplify existential anxiety, necessitating structured coping tools” [7]. The anxiety young people feel today is not an inevitable part of growing up—it is a byproduct of a system designed to exploit their attention, emotions, and insecurities.

This is a wake-up call for Big Tech, brands, marketers, parents, and educators alike.

This is a wake-up call for Big Tech, brands, marketers, parents, and educators alike. How will future generations judge the digital ecosystem we build today? Will they see us as complicit in its harm or as the ones who had the courage to fix it?

This Is Our Moment

  • Big Tech: Redesign algorithms, enforce accountability, and prioritize well-being over profit.
  • Brands and Marketers: Lead with authenticity, abandon harmful trends, and embrace socially responsible campaigns.
  • Parents and Educators: Be relentless in advocating for digital literacy, critical thinking, and balanced habits.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. The Beta Generation deserves a digital future that empowers, not exploits. Let’s not drag them into this mess—let’s give them the tools and the environment to thrive. The time to act is now.


Footnotes:[1] Yale Medicine (2024) "Social Media and Teen Mental Health: A Parent’s Guide" Yale Medicine.[2] American Psychological Association (2024). "Teen Social Use and Mental Health" American Psychological Association.[3] Newport Academy. "Effect of Social Media on Teenagers" Newport Academy.[4] University College London (2024). "Social Media Algorithms Amplify Misogynistic Content for Teens" University College London.[5] NBC News, "Generation Beta Starting 2025: AI Tech Like Never Before." NBC News.[6] Faculty of Public Health, "Social Media Consultation: Engagement Algorithms." Faculty of Public Health.[7] Indian Express, "Meet Generation Beta: The First Digital Natives Who Will Redefine Our Future." Indian Express.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Bilal Hallab, FCIM

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics