SSR vs SSG
In the world of web development, choosing the right way to render your web pages can significantly impact performance, SEO, and user experience. Two prominent contenders in this arena are Server-side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG). Both techniques offer distinct advantages and disadvantages, making the decision a crucial one for developers. This article delves into the inner workings of SSR and SSG, exploring their strengths and weaknesses to help you pick the optimal solution for your website.
What is Server-side Rendering (SSR)?
In SSR, when a user requests a webpage, the server retrieves all the data required to build the page and then generates the HTML code. This HTML code is then sent to the user's browser, which renders the page.
Benefits of SSR
Drawbacks of SSR
What is Static Site Generation (SSG)?
With SSG, the HTML code for a webpage is pre-generated at build time. This means that the HTML code is already there and ready to be served when a user requests a webpage.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Benefits of SSG
Drawbacks of SSG
Choosing between SSR and SSG
The best way to choose between SSR and SSG depends on the specific needs of your website. If you have a website with a lot of static content, such as a blog or a portfolio website, then SSG is a good choice. If you have a more complex website that requires a lot of interactivity and user input, then SSR is a better option.
Here's a table summarizing the key differences between SSR and SSG: