Presentation Slides 23 & 24

Goodness Fit Measures

The Model Construct closely resembles Figure 2.2 on page 88.

(Appendix 23)    Predictors                     ESTATEFAC, FFBPROC, LOGEFF

                           Dependent Variable     Oil Extraction Rate (OER)

Correlations coefficient R = 0.953       Coefficient of Determination R(sq) = 0.908

                Adj. R(sq) = 0.898

              The adjusted R(sq) is a modified version of R(sq) that has been adjusted for the number of predictors in the model.

              It decreases when a predictor improves the model by less than expected by chance.

Q(sq) Predictive Relevance

Q(sq) represents measures of how well observed values are reconstructed by the model and its parameter (Chin, 2010).

Since blind folding is a sample re-use technique which systemically deletes data points and provides a prognosis of the original values, the procedure requires an omission distance D between 5 and 12 (Wold, 1982).

In this study, D is 7 and is obtained the Cross-Validated Redundancy (Table 4.24, page 254)

Cross Validated Redundancy, small 0.02, medium 0.15, large 0.35, > 0.5 good  (Chin, 2010).

 Estate Factors is 0 and lacks predictive relevance in redundancy because this measures the capacity of the path model to predict the endogenous indirectly.

An alternative is Construct Cross Validated Communality. This measures the capacity of the model to predict directly and is 0.444 for estate factors (Table 4.24, page 254).

Goodness Fit Measures

Goodness of Fit measure refers to the geometric mean of the average communality and average R(sq) (Tenenhaus et al., 2005).

It tells if the sample data can represent the data expected to find in the actual population. GoF 0.10 small, 0.13 medium, 0.36 large.

GoF was found to be 0.663 and allow to conclude that this model performs well compared to the baseline values and adequately supported that the model was globally validated (Table 4.25, page 255).

Goodness fit measures, hypothesis H1 next slide 23-27



H1 Estate Factors have a direct influence on FFB Processing

Hypothesis testing is run to determine whether a claim is true or not, given a population parameter.

 

(Fig. 2.2, page 88)     Predictor                      Estate Factors

                                    Dependent Variable    FFB Processing

 

Appendix 24a Model Summary 

                        R = 0.470    R(sq) = 0.221

The square of the correlation tells about the amount of variability in y that is explained by the model (0.26, 0.13, 0.02)

Coefficients correlation measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship (+1 and -1)

                               

Appendix 24b ANOVA      Analysis of Variation, to analyze the differences among group means in a sample (Ronald Fisher)

Sum of squares measures how far individual measurements are from the mean, also known as variation

Mean squares are estimates of variance across groups, (sum of squares/degree of freedom)

‘f’ is (variation between sample means/variation within the samples)

Significance probability or p-value

                           sum of squares          df                       ms                    f                   Sig.

Regression         1.885                          df1       1            1.885               35.001          0.000

Residual              6.660                         df2   124.00       0.054

df indicates the number of independent values that can vary in an analysis without breaking any constraints

df1 how the cell means to relate to the grand mean or marginal means

df2 how the single observations in the cells relate to the cell means

 

Appendix 24c Coefficients

std error is a measure of the accuracy of predictors,

se is the square root of the average squared deviation

t = (coefficient/standard error)

unstandardized coefficient           se          stdcoefficient   t             Sig.        Tolerance           VIF

0.616                 0.104    0.470                5.925     0.000     1.000                 1.000

 

Therefore, hypothesis H1, Estate factors have a direct influence on FFB Processing is supported.


Estate Factors influenced directly FFB processing is supported, FFB Processing influenced directly OER next slide 24-27

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by CHEAH CHENG TEIK

  • Answers and Discussions 61 to 66

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

  • Answers and Discussions 56 to 60

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

  • Answers and Discussions 51 to 55

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

  • Answers and Discussions 46 to 50

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

  • Answers and Discussions 41 to 45

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

  • Answers and Discussions 36 to 40

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

  • ANSWERS and DISCUSSIONS 31 to 35

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

  • Answers and Discussions 26 to 30

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

  • Answers and Discussions 21 to 25

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

    1 Comment
  • Answers and Discussions 16 to 20

    The Oil Palm Plantations and Palm Oil Mill ‘Exposing the Flaws’ by Dr. Cheah Cheng Teik Ph.

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics