Part 3: Leveling Up – Roo Code vs. Cline.bot for the Ambitious, not just Beginners!
Roo Code and Cline in action – more features, more control. They’re like having an architect and a coder AI by your side for your passion project

Part 3: Leveling Up – Roo Code vs. Cline.bot for the Ambitious, not just Beginners!

So you’ve gotten your feet wet (Vibe Coding for Everyone - Article Parts 1 & 2) with the basics of vibe coding, and you’re ready to dive a little deeper? Welcome to the next level of AI-assisted coding. In this part, we’ll explore Roo Code and Cline.bot (often just called Cline). These are vibe coding tools as well, but they’re a bit more customizable and powerful, aimed at those who want to tinker under the hood or tackle bigger projects. Think of them as the “advanced mode” – still accessible to non-traditional coders, but with more switches and dials you can play with.

(If you’re completely new, you might want to start with the tools from Part 2. But if you’re an adventurous builder or a power user type, read on!)

What Are Roo Code and Cline?

Roo Code and Cline are like cousins in the AI coding world. In fact, Roo Code began as a fork of Cline – meaning it’s based on Cline’s original code, but then expanded with extra features and improvements. Both are typically used as extensions in Visual Studio Code (similar to Claude Coder), and both let you connect to various AI models (like OpenAI’s GPT-4, Anthropic’s Claude, Google’s Gemini, etc.) to drive the coding process. They function as autonomous coding agents: you give high-level instructions, and the agent plans and writes code, even executing commands like running the app or doing version control tasks. These tools have garnered a following among AI enthusiasts who enjoy pushing the envelope of what AI can do in development.

In simpler terms:

Cline.bot – An AI assistant that can use your command-line and editor to build software via VSCode. It was one of the earlier open-source “AI coder” assistants. Cline’s goal is to automate many coding tasks: it can create and edit files, run the project to test it, and handle whole-file modifications. It’s known for being quite capable at making broad changes (e.g., refactoring an entire file to improve structure). Cline integrates with services like OpenRouter to access AI models, which means it can work with different AI backends. Out of the box, it was often used with Anthropic’s Claude or OpenAI models. Many early adopters liked Cline because it was like having a tireless command-line jockey who could also write code – you could say “set up a new React project and add a login page,” and Cline would do it step by step.

Roo Code – Think of Roo as Cline on steroids. The community around Cline created Roo as an enhanced version to address some limitations and add new capabilities. Roo Code supports more customization and tends to be updated frequently with cutting-edge features. For example, Roo introduced diff-based edits (meaning it tries to only change the parts of the code that need changing, instead of regenerating a whole file). It also has multiple “modes” of operation for different tasks. By default, Roo has modes like Code, Architect, and Ask. Code mode is for writing and modifying code, Architect mode is for high-level planning (the AI might outline an approach or design without writing full code), and Ask mode is simply for asking questions or for explanations. Roo can intelligently switch between modes; for instance, if you’re in Architect (planning) and you decide to implement something, Roo might suggest “Shall I switch to Code mode to do that?” automatically. This multi-mode setup is a way of doing a bit of multi-agent planning – it’s like having a planner and a coder in one AI, and it knows when to act as each. Moreover, Roo Code allows you to create custom modes with your own settings. It’s highly configurable: you can choose which AI model to use for each mode, set rules on what files a mode can access, etc. In short, Roo is geared toward power users who want more control over the AI’s behavior.

Both Roo and Cline are typically free to use (open-source). The cost factor comes from the API usage of the AI models you connect them to. So if you use, say, OpenAI’s API with them, you’d pay OpenAI for the usage. Some users hook these tools up to free or experimental models (like some open models or trial API keys) to keep costs low. The flexibility is there – you could even run them with local AI models if you have one, though that’s more for techie experimenters.

Key Features (in Non-Tech Terms)

Let’s break down some of the advanced features of Roo Code vs Cline in a way that makes sense even if you’re not a developer by trade:

Control and Customization: Cline was somewhat limited in configuration – it worked in a straightforward manner with default settings, which was part of its simplicity. Roo, however, lets users tweak almost everything. For example, with Roo you can decide which AI model to use for coding versus for planning (maybe you use a faster, cheaper model for simple tasks and a powerful model for complex ones). You can also set “permissions” – e.g., require the AI to ask your approval before running a dangerous command or editing a critical file. This permission system acts like safety guardrails so the AI doesn’t, say, delete something important without you okaying it.

Performance: Roo has worked on being faster and more stable. Users report that Roo Code often responds quicker and handles large projects more smoothly than the original Cline. If you have a big codebase (tens of thousands of lines across many files), these tools can strain the AI’s context limit. Roo tries to optimize this by only sending relevant parts of code (diffs and smaller chunks) to the AI when possible, which can improve speed and reduce cost.

Multiple Language Support: Both Cline and Roo can work across different programming languages. Building a Python app? JavaScript? Go? They can switch contexts. Roo in particular prides itself on multi-language support – it’s built to handle diverse projects simultaneously. For a hobbyist, this means you could, for instance, have a project with a Python backend and a JavaScript frontend and use the same assistant to handle both sides.

Latest Model Integrations: Roo tends to integrate quickly with the newest AI models. It already supports things like Google’s Gemini models and Meta’s AI models (if you have access to those) , whereas Cline initially supported the standard ones like GPT-4 and Claude. As an advanced user, having access to multiple AI providers through one interface is powerful – you can pick the best “AI brain” for the job. If one model fails or gets something wrong, you could even switch and ask another model for a second opinion, all within Roo’s interface.

Autonomy and Planning: Perhaps the most sci-fi aspect: both Cline and Roo aim for a level of autonomy where you could give a high-level task, and the AI figures out the steps. For example, “Build me a TODO list app with a backend API and a frontend UI.” The AI might break this down: set up a backend project, implement API endpoints, set up a frontend, connect them, etc. Cline uses a simpler Plan/Act cycle (it might output a plan, then execute it) . Roo’s Architect mode is like an enhanced planning phase where it can outline architecture or gather requirements (it can even research or read docs if connected to the web). While this is amazing, it’s also where things can get complex – sometimes the plan needs your input or correction, and autonomy can lead the AI astray if the goal is ambiguous. Still, when it works, it feels like having a project manager + developer duo working for you.

Who Are These Tools For?

If you identify with any of these, Roo or Cline might be for you:

The Hobbyist-Turned-Maker: Maybe you started with a simpler tool and built a small app. Now you want to create a more ambitious project – say a full website with a database – and you’re okay investing a bit more time to set things up. You also wouldn’t mind learning a bit more technical detail in the process. Cline or Roo can be your co-pilot as you scale up.

The Power User or Tinkerer: You love the idea of tweaking settings, trying different AI models, and generally fiddling to get the best result. Roo Code will appeal to you with its myriad options. If you enjoy beta-testing and living on the edge with new features, Roo’s frequent updates (and active Discord community) will keep you busy.

The Builder with Specific Needs: Perhaps you have a niche project – for example, a Unity game script or an Arduino project – something that the more mainstream tools might not directly cater to. Because Cline/Roo functions like general AI agents in VSCode, you can attempt any kind of coding task with them. They’re not limited to web apps. They also can integrate with your system’s tools. For instance, Cline can execute CLI commands, meaning it could run build tools, interact with git version control, or query a database as part of its process. This is powerful if you know how to leverage it (and also why these tools are a bit more advanced).

On the other hand, if the above sounds intimidating and you really just want something straightforward, you might not need Roo or Cline yet. These shine when you say “I want more control and I’m willing to handle a bit more complexity for it.”

Practical Example Differences

Let’s illustrate with a scenario: “Build a personal blog website with a homepage, about page, and a blog post page. Use a backend to store posts.”

• Using Cline: You’d open VSCode, maybe create an empty project folder. Invoke Cline (likely via a chat command or clicking the extension UI) and say, “Create a new project for a personal blog website. I need a homepage, about page, blog page, and a backend for posts.” Cline might generate a plan or just start coding. It might decide on a tech stack (say, Node.js with Express for backend, and plain HTML/CSS or a simple frontend setup). It would create multiple files: maybe server.js, some HTML templates, a CSS file, etc. If it doesn’t automatically plan, you might have to instruct it step by step: “Okay, now create an Express server,” then “Add an endpoint for fetching blog posts,” then “Create an HTML template for the homepage,” and so on – each time, Cline writes the code. After each step, you could ask it to run the server and see the output (Cline can run commands like node server.js). If something breaks, Cline will show the error and you can ask it to fix it. Essentially, you are the project manager giving tasks, and Cline executes them diligently. You might need to guide the structure a bit if it gets something wrong, but it will follow your lead well.

• Using Roo Code: In Roo, you could try a higher-level instruction thanks to its Architect mode. You might say in Architect mode: “Plan a project for a personal blog site with Home, About, Blog pages, and a backend storing posts.” Roo could output a structured plan: e.g., “Tech stack: Next.js for frontend, a Node.js API or maybe a simple JSON file for posts storage, etc. Steps: 1) Initialize project, 2) Create pages…, 3) Implement backend…” Once you approve that plan (or edit it), you can switch to Code mode or let Roo switch automatically. It would then execute those steps, creating the Next.js project, adding pages, etc. Suppose along the way, it hits a snag – maybe a dependency issue. Roo might pause and ask for guidance or automatically try to resolve it. With its extended model support, if one model isn’t performing well for code, you could even switch (say from GPT-4 to Claude) mid-project for better results. After coding, you could ask Roo in Ask mode: “How do I run this project?” It might respond with instructions or even a script to launch a development server. Throughout Roo’s additional features, like quick actions (right-click to ask for an explanation on a piece of code), come in handy if you want to understand something. By the end, you have a more complex project structure, but Roo helped manage it.

Tips for Using Roo Code/Cline as a First-Time User

Tip 1: Start in Familiar Territory – If you used a simpler tool before, maybe bring a small project you made into Roo or Cline to extend it. For example, take that to-do list app you built in Bolt, load the code in VSCode, and then use Roo to add a new feature. This gives you a baseline to work from and see how the AI handles an existing codebase.

Tip 2: Take Advantage of Modes (in Roo) – If you use Roo Code, try to use its modes intentionally. When you want a plan or high-level advice, use Architect mode (“What’s the best way to add a user login to my app?”). When you want code written or changed, use Code mode (“Implement the login form with authentication”). This separation helps the AI focus. Cline doesn’t have named modes by default, but it often will do a planning step if you ask something big – you can encourage it by asking for an outline first.

Tip 3: Keep an Eye on the AI – These advanced tools are powerful, but can sometimes go on autopilot a bit too much. For instance, they might start refactoring code you didn’t ask to refactor. As one user humorously noted, an AI coder can be “enthusiastically refactoring your payment system when you just asked to change a font color” if you’re not specific. The lesson: monitor what the AI is doing. Both Roo and Cline will show you the diffs (changes) they make to your files; don’t be afraid to say “Stop” or “Undo that” if it’s doing something off-track.

Community Resources: Since these tools are open-source, community support is great. Roo Code’s GitHub and Discord often have people discussing best practices (there might even be a “Architect mode guide” or recommended settings for certain projects). If you run into installation issues or weird behavior, you’re likely not the first – search for others’ experiences. Cline and Roo are evolving, so updating to the latest version often fixes bugs (Roo, especially, is rapidly updated).

In summary, Roo Code and Cline.bot unlock a higher degree of freedom in vibe coding. They can feel a bit complex at first, but they are incredibly empowering for those willing to engage with their advanced features. You can build more sophisticated projects and customize the AI’s workflow to your liking. Many hobbyists have used these tools to create full products and even maintain them over time, treating the AI as a true partner in development.

Call to Action: Are you interested in trying a more advanced vibe coding setup like Roo or Cline? If you’ve used them, what’s a feature you loved or a quirk you noticed? For those hesitant, what would you want to build that might convince you to give these a shot?

#AICoding #DevTools #VibeCoding

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Keith A. McFarland

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics