Moving Beyond the Diagram
The true power of an affinity diagram lies in what follows. It’s not just about organizing ideas; it’s about using those insights to drive action. Whether you create an interrelationship diagram, dive into root cause analysis, or develop a focused action plan, this tool is the starting point for meaningful change.
When tackling complex challenges in Quality Assurance or any team-driven environment, the affinity diagram is a great go-to tool for organizing thoughts and identifying solutions. It’s simple yet powerful, and it’s been a game-changer for managing large amounts of information or brainstorming results, helping teams work smarter, not harder.
So what is an Affinity Diagram?
An affinity diagram, sometimes called an affinity chart or K-J Method, organizes a large number of ideas into natural groupings. Think of it as a structured way to make sense of chaos after a brainstorming session. The method was developed in the 1960s by Jiro Kawakita, a Japanese anthropologist, and it’s an intuitive way to tap into a team’s creativity and shared understanding.
Here’s when an affinity diagram can be handy:
Some typical situations, include but are not limited to:
• After a brainstorming session
• While analyzing verbal data, like survey results
• While collecting and organizing large data sets
• While developing relationships or themes among ideas
• While categorizing attributes to address them at a higher level
The affinity diagram process lets a group move beyond its habitual thinking and preconceived categories. This technique accesses excellent knowledge and understanding residing untapped in our intuition. Affinity diagrams tend to have 40 to 60 items; however, seeing 100 to 200 items is not unusual.
This method isn’t just for Quality Assurance; it works in any environment where ideas need structure.
How the Process Works
The affinity diagram process is straightforward and involves just a few materials: sticky notes or cards, markers, and a large surface like a wall or table. Here’s how I approach it in a 3 step process.
Step 1: Gather and Record Ideas
Each idea gets written on a sticky note. Whether from a brainstorming session or as input from a group, every thought gets its own note. These notes are then randomly placed on a surface so everyone can see them.
Key Tip: Use markers to ensure the text is readable from a distance and keep ideas short—three to seven words per note works best.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Step 2a: Find relationships and ideas that seem to be related
Team members sort the notes generated in Step 1 into related groups. In this step, we are attempting to look for relationships between individual ideas. Have team members simultaneously sort the ideas (without talking) into five to ten related groupings. Repeat until all notes are grouped. It’s okay to have “loners” that don’t fit a group(you can duplicate them). This step is all about intuition.
Key Tip: Even though it may sound strange, it’s very important that no one talks during this step. The focus should be on finding and grouping related ideas. Talking and communication could influence others and interrupt the natural flow of the exercise.
Step 2b: Discuss and define categories with your team
Once the notes are grouped as described in Step 2a, the team discusses what the groupings mean. Categories or headers for each group are defined to capture their essence. If there’s no clear header, create one. You can discuss the shape of the chart, any surprising patterns, and reasons for moving controversial notes. Make changes and move ideas around as necessary. When ideas are grouped to the team’s satisfaction, select a heading for each group. To do so, look for a note in each grouping that captures the meaning of the group. Place it at the top of the group. If there is no note, write one. Often, I’ve found it’s helpful to write or highlight this note in a different color.
Key Tip: Notes should identify the common thread for all groupings and describe that thread.
Step 3: Combine groups and create supergroups/clusters and next steps
If appropriate, the team reviews the supergroups/clusters and prioritizes which ideas to focus on combining groups. This step will help simplify the structure further and assign ideas to actionable categories. Large affinity diagrams are overwhelming and can stall the group's progress on initiatives, so it’s important to leave the workshop with a plan to move forward.
Key Tip: Base assignment on “your gut feel,” not through contemplation.
Key Tip: If team members struggle to reach a final discussion, consider using dot voting or dot coding techniques when prioritizing clusters.
Real-World Applications
Here’s how I’ve seen affinity diagrams make a difference:
Dos and Don’ts
While there isn’t a set of hard and fast rules of how to do affinity diagramming, keep the following dos and don’ts in mind to set yourself up for success:
#QuaityManagement #QMS #GMP #AffinityDiagram #Quality Assurance
Freelance ISO 17025 Consultant | Quality Management Specialist | GMP Auditor |Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Expert
3moVery informative!