Migrating from On-Premise to Cloud: Why Shifting from ETL to ELT is a Smart Data Strategy.
When I started my career, I worked on an ETL migration project, and I thought I’d share some insights with you. Recently, I decided to revisit ETL migration in more depth and discovered an interesting trend: moving from on-premises systems to the cloud often results in a shift from ETL to ELT.
While switching from ETL to ELT isn’t mandatory, it’s often recommended due to its advantages, such as greater scalability, cost efficiency, and improved compatibility with modern data warehouses.
Let me first explain the basics of ETL and ELT processes.
What is Extract, Transform, Load (ETL)?
ETL stands for Extract, Transform, Load, and is the process of extracting business data from various data sources, cleaning and transforming it into a format that can be easily understood, used, and analyzed, and then loading it into a destination or target system so that we can send to the downstream uses such as business intelligence (BI) and big data analytics.
I have uploaded the ETL code to showcase the complete flow of extracting, transforming, and loading data from a single source. Please check it out here: ETL Processes Code
The diagram below illustrates the process of extracting, transforming, and loading data from a single source, such as a CSV.
The diagram below illustrates the process of extracting, transforming, and loading data from multiple sources.
What is Extract Load Transform (ELT)?
ELT stands for “Extract, Load, and Transform” and describes the set of data integration processes to extract data from one system, load it into a target repository, and then transform it for downstream uses such as business intelligence (BI) and big data analytics.
The diagram below illustrates the process of extracting data from multiple sources.
The migration from on-premises to the cloud should also trigger a switch from ETL to ELT?
When migrating from on-premises to the cloud, you may wonder if you should switch from ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) to ELT (Extract, Load, Transform). Let’s break down both ETL and ELT in the context of on-premises and cloud systems and understand why moving to ELT during cloud migration makes sense.
Recommended by LinkedIn
On-Premises ETL:
On-premises ETL refers to data integration and processing that happens within a company’s local servers or data centers. In this model, data is extracted, transformed, and then loaded into a local database or data warehouse, such as Oracle Data Warehouse or Microsoft SQL Server.
Cloud ETL:
Cloud ETL, on the other hand, happens in cloud-based platforms. The data is extracted, transformed, and then loaded into cloud databases like Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, or Snowflake. With cloud ETL, you still do the transformations outside of the cloud database, which can limit some of the benefits of the cloud.
Can ETL Still Be Used When Migrating to the Cloud?
Yes, it is possible to continue using ETL when moving to the cloud, but it comes with some challenges:
Why Switch from ETL to ELT During Cloud Migration?
As organizations move to the cloud, switching from ETL to ELT becomes a smart choice. Here's why:
Conclusion
Switching from ETL to ELT during a cloud migration is often recommended because ELT takes full advantage of cloud infrastructure. It simplifies processes, reduces costs, and enhances performance, making it a more efficient and scalable approach in the cloud environment.
All Pros agree - ETL is the Best
3moAnjali Kumari Gupta A couple of points: * Cloud data warehouses are not designed to handle transformations directly. Tools like dbt require writing code in Python to do the work. * Using ELT requires writing code to do the transformations. Your solutions will then require programmers to create and maintain. * Creating and debugging complex transformations in ELT is not easy. * There is now plenty of evidence the public cloud is on average 2.5x more expensive compared to the on-premises or private cloud deployments. There is an accelerating trend of "cloud repatriation" for the past 2 years. * ELT might make sense for very limited scenarios like reporting or ad-hoc analysis. For all other integration solutions, it is less efficient and more complicated to create and maintain. * You can create flexible ETL solutions, using the metadata-driven data pipelines methodology. You have mentioned in your post, the keyword "scalability". However, if 99% of the integration solutions deal with small to mid-size data sets, the scalability requirement is not important in the overall picture. Good ETL platforms can easily handle millions of records in a short amount of time.