Industry expectations from the consultants
This topic has been discussed multiple times over the period at various forums but in most cases, stakeholders’ expectations are not met by the consultants. I keep getting this kind of feedback from my fellow Internal Audit Heads.
There can be multiple reasons around the same including limitations at the client’s end w.r.t mismatch in SOW vis-à-vis stakeholder’s expectations, data, and process owner’s availability, data alteration, or misleading information, etc. These are some of the serious concerns which should be managed end to end by the IA Head and the consultants with the support of the top management if required.
Assuming, there are no limitations at the client’s end then what should be done by the consultants to add value to the business and assure the respective stakeholders? Although, I have been discussing and sharing my views and inputs with all my team members and other colleagues at various forums but now thought to spread awareness for the benefit of everyone through one of the biggest professional networks i.e. Linkedin.
Listed below are some of my key learnings for your reference:
- Understand the client’s business, problem statement/Scope of Work and objective of the review;
- Understand the universe of the project based on financial statements, system data, discussion with various stakeholders, Industry colleagues, etc.;
- Get inputs from the top management at the beginning of review on the entire scope and check concerns if any related to any function, individual or the process;
- Draft your interview questions in advance before meeting with the client and send MOM to avoid any conflict later. Avoid repetitive questions;
- Keep track of data requirements, follow-up and send a status update to the management on a timely basis;
- Prioritize your work basis client’s availability and project requirements;
- Usage of the latest technology such as AI, Blockchain or Data Analytics tool, etc for sample selection, testing, and reporting. Try to use technology as much as possible to ensure accuracy, increasing efficiency, and better results;
- Define and identify sample basis regulatory requirements, erratic trends, abnormal transactions, and the materiality of the transactions;
- Data/Process benchmarking;
- Go over and above procedural non-compliances and add value to the business;
- Focus on solutions as well and don’t limit yourself till the level of observations;
- Way-forward: understand the business vision for the next couple of years, planned/expected changes in the process, and conduct review keeping in mind those changes and provide solutions accordingly;
- Design risk categories along with the impact parameters such as financial, regulatory, reputation, etc. and rate your observations accordingly to avoid conflicts with the auditee;
- Highlight risks to the business which are specific to your observations and not in general;
- Agree on recommendations, responsible team and the timeline for implementation with the auditee;
- Review your results in terms of factual accuracy, executive summary, reporting requirements, etc. before releasing;
- The Executive summary should be updated with the material observations where management focus is required on an immediate basis. Summarize and assess overall project e.g., well-managed area, the improvement required, etc. Just to update at the end of the day stakeholders are looking for your assessment and going to take actions accordingly;
- Good practices: with the change of time auditee is also expecting you to highlight good practices so that they are getting recognition from the top management, continue the same practices and at the same time, you are also able to manage the relationship despite giving observations;
- Follow-ups: Ensure implementation status is checked on a timely basis (based on the agreed timeline) with the auditee and update is given to the management and;
- Stay in touch with your key connections in the organization i.e. IA Head, CFO, etc. and update them on a timely basis with the changes in the industry, process, policies, regulatory norms, surveys, conferences, or white papers prepared by you. This will help the organization and consultants to move forward together with the same vision.
Happy to receive your inputs or respond to your queries if required. Thanks
PS: Next time I’ll try to share expectations of consultants 😊
Associate Director - Audit support at AMSRI Consulting LLC
4yVery good
Founder & Managing Partner ServeMax Advisors | President @ ACFE Haryana Chapter
4yDear Mohit Indeed a meaning documentation and quite comprehensive. My feedback would be an appreciation for such effort with few possible addition 1. A comprehensive process map in flow chart form rather than narratives 2. A tinge of forensic attitude/angle 3. When technology is around then cyber security is also follow up expectation from industry 4. Recommendations driven by root cause rather than being generic 5. Positive assurance as they wish to know where am i doing good so that as a industry leader that could be marketed 6. Give conclusion in observations rather than sometime facts/inconclusive points! 7. Automation with process /RPAs 8. Continuously knowing and growing awareness about tools, be it ACL, Idea, Lucid Charts, MS Visio, Tableau, MS Teams, Grammerly, etc. Happy to read your article . Thanks
Business Advisor I Independent Director
4yWell articulated
Third Party Risk Management| Sanctions Screening| Ethics & Compliance
4yThank you for this article. Its very well explained and covers all the requirements. I would just like to share one suggestion basis on my experience. As clients stakeholders we should be very clear with the consultants in terms of our top priority expectation from the audit before the beginning. What i mean is that whether we are looking for simple Assurance on our policies & procedures, expecting a potential fraud, strengthen our internal controls, reviewing our financials etc. The top expectation largely impacts the penetration of audit SOW into the client’s processes and would help the consultant to focus on the key area. While a good consultant should largely cover all mentioned areas, It can save both time and effort and create a win-win for both.
Head of Sales and Solutions - AI & Cloud @ Tata Consultancy Services | E-2-E IT Services
4yWell articulated views on how to conduct an audit and meet stekholder expectations in a professional manner. Kudos to you