How Misconfigured Backup Strategies Led to Skyrocketing Data Transfer Costs
Cloud cost mistakes don’t always come from overprovisioning or scaling issues—sometimes, they stem from simple network misconfigurations that go unnoticed until the bill arrives.
In this Common Cloud Cost Mistakes issue, we explore how a client’s misconfigured Private Link DNS settings and manual cross-region backup strategy led to huge egress charges—all while thinking they were using private networking. The result? Skyrocketing cloud costs and an issue no one noticed until it was too late.
How Private Link DNS Misconfiguration Led to Massive Costs
1️⃣ The Backup Setup
2️⃣ What Went Wrong?
❌ DNS Misconfiguration Broke Private Link Resolution
❌ Backup Replication to the Next Region Also Used the Internet
❌ No Cost Monitoring or Anomaly Alerts
3️⃣ The Cost Impact
💸 Public Internet Egress Charges: Backup data left Azure via the public internet instead of using ExpressRoute or Azure’s backbone.
💸 Cross-Region Transfers Over Public Internet: Instead of using GRS or RA-GRS, they manually copied backups between Azure regions, triggering huge egress fees.
💸 Traffic billed at Standard Outbound Rates: Every terabyte of backup data was charged as if it were being sent outside of Azure, even though it was just copied between services.
Recommended by LinkedIn
4️⃣ How This Should Have Been Done (Best Practices)
✅ Fix Private Link DNS Resolution
✅ Use Storage Account Replication Instead of Manual Transfers
✅ Configure Private Endpoints Correctly
✅ Use ExpressRoute for All Backup Traffic
✅ Enable Cost Monitoring & Anomaly Alerts
Avoid Costly Backup Mistakes
🚨 This DNS misconfiguration issue forced backup traffic over the public internet, leading to massive unnecessary data transfer costs.
🚨 Cross-region replication should have been done using built-in Storage Replication (GRS), not manual copying.
Cost misconfigurations like this can happen anytime, and without proper monitoring, they often go unnoticed for weeks. Ensure your cloud infrastructure is optimized not just for performance but also for cost efficiency.
Have you experienced an unexpected cloud cost spike? Please share your story in the comments, and let’s discuss how to navigate these challenges together!
Erol
Cloud FinOps Manager | Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization & FinOps Strategy | Delivered $26M in Cloud Savings with Data-Driven Cost Governance | AWS,AZURE,GCP
2moGreat post. Well said. I’ve encountered similar scenarios in AWS. The worst part is that during my initial assessment of an environment, I discovered AWS Storage Gateways that had been sitting idle for over a year after the data migration was completed and were still incurring $500 per gateway per month in unnecessary costs.