Helm vs. Kustomize: Are We Using the Wrong Tool for Kubernetes?

When it comes to managing Kubernetes manifests, two tools dominate the discussion: Helm and Kustomize. But are we actually using the right tool for the job, or are we just following the hype?

After working extensively with both, I’ve seen firsthand how each tool solves different problems—but I’ve also seen teams struggle by forcing the wrong solution into their workflows. So, let’s break it down and figure out which one truly fits your needs.

Helm: The Power of Templating

Helm is often referred to as the "package manager for Kubernetes." It simplifies application deployment by using charts—predefined templates that package up Kubernetes resources, making it easier to install, upgrade, and manage applications.

Why Helm?

✅ Pre-built charts: thousands of ready-to-use charts available (NGINX, Prometheus, PostgreSQL).

✅ Dependency management: easily handles complex deployments with multiple microservices.

✅ Rollbacks and versioning: Helm maintains a history of releases, allowing quick rollbacks.

✅ Strong community support: since it’s widely adopted, finding solutions is easier.

When Helm Might Not Be Ideal

❌ Complex templating syntax: Helm templates use Go templating, which can become hard to manage.

❌ Limited flexibility for modifying base manifests: customizing pre-built charts can be painful.

❌ Configuration drift risk: overriding values.yaml files can lead to hard-to-track differences between deployments.

Kustomize: The Power of Declarative Configuration

Kustomize takes a different approach: it allows you to define Kubernetes manifests natively and apply overlays to modify them without introducing templating.

Why Kustomize?

✅ Native to Kubernetes: it’s built directly into kubectl apply -k, making it a natural extension of Kubernetes workflows.

✅ Patch-based customization: instead of duplicating YAML files, it allows overlays to modify base manifests.

✅ Better readability: no complex templating syntax; just YAML with layered modifications.

When Kustomize Might Not Be Ideal

❌ No package management: unlike Helm, Kustomize doesn’t manage dependencies.

❌ No built-in rollback/versioning: if a deployment fails, there’s no Helm-like rollback feature.

❌ Weaker ecosystem: unlike Helm’s pre-built charts, you must define most things manually.

Side-by-Side Comparison

So, Which One Should You Use?

Use Helm if:

• You need package management, dependencies, and easy installation.
• You want a well-supported ecosystem with pre-built charts.
• Your team is comfortable with Go templating.

Use Kustomize if:

• You prefer a native Kubernetes approach.
• You need clean, patch-based customization without templating.
• Your deployment strategy focuses on declarative YAML.

In reality, the best approach is often using both—for example, managing base configurations with Kustomize while leveraging Helm for package installation.

Have you faced challenges using Helm or Kustomize? Which tool do you prefer in your Kubernetes workflows? Let’s discuss in the comments!

#Helm #Kustomize #Kubernetes #DevOps #CloudNative