Five Ways to Improve Relationships between Expatriate and Local Team Members
In 2015, I studied the relationships between expatriate and local staff in humanitarian organizations, and how human resource management can affect this. This research was done in collaboration with Médecins Sans Frontières as part of my Masters Thesis. I never publicly published my research, but I feel that it at least deserves a LinkedIn post to share some of the highlights and practical implications with others who might be interested. So, without further ado, here are 5 Ways that Humanitarian Organizations can Improve Relationships between Expatriate and Local Team Members:
Recommended by LinkedIn
4. Develop a positive organizational culture and team dynamics, focusing on trust, equity, and inclusion. For example, provide time and guidance for teams to discuss group norms through a Team Charter. Design organizational structures and working spaces to encourage collaboration between staff. Do not underestimate the power of simple things, like colleagues sharing lunch together regularly.
5. Facilitate the development of a shared group identity. People tend to like people they perceive as similar to them and in their “in-group.” While the titles of “expatriate” or “local” divide staff into separate groups, organizations and team leaders can work to ensure staff connect with a superordinate identity – meaning an identity that all staff share. This could be through a shared identity of “humanitarian,” “staff of XYZ organization,” or even “someone who likes movies.”
I hope this can serve as a starting point for reflection and discussion for those within the humanitarian sector. This area is a passion of mine, and one I have spent a lot of time researching. I could write chapters and chapters on each of these bullet points, and many more points. And how to implement the sociological research practically. I wanted to keep this article relatively short and sweet, but I’d be happy to chat (or vent) with anyone about this! Also happy to hear your thoughts, critiques, and comments!
Enterprisecoach - systemic leadership and coaching
3yWhat a fascinating and important topic!
Leading Scalable, Human-Centered Solutions for Housing, Employment & Social Integration | Migration & Asylum Strategist
3yStart by calling « expatriate » « economic migrants »
Regional staff Counsellor
3yThis is a great research Shana. Is it possible to access your research, I am very interested to read it.
President at Terra Institute
3yVery good article and very good that you published it. Not enough people reflect on what they are doing and fewer share their reflections. Well done. David
Humanitarian & International Development | Social Advocacy & Policy | Community Driven | Research-led Practice | Diversity | Inclusion | Anti-Racism
3yInsightful! The fact that ‘expatriate staff’ is still a legit term automatically creating power imbalances. Often associated with western staff and implies that they do not ‘assimilate’ (eg learn the language) unlike immigrants. Ugh I always have had a strong dislike for it.