Faster and Cheaper Insights Are Costing Us Something Priceless... Respect
I just returned from #IIEX, and by all accounts, I should be riding high.
The sessions were strong. The energy? Electric. I even launched a new AI product (more on that soon).
But in the quiet moments since Thursday, something hasn’t sat right with me.
Because the most important insights at the conference weren’t shared on stage—they were whispered in the hallways:
And everywhere I looked? A wave of vendors promising faster, cheaper research powered by AI.
On paper, it sounds like progress: quicker timelines, lower costs, more automation so we can have time to “think strategically”.
But I keep coming back to one question:
What in life do you truly RESPECT that’s faster and cheaper?
Sure, we value faster and cheaper solutions. But do we respect them?
When the stakes are high—your health, your family, your future—do you reach for the budget option?
When your child breaks an arm, do you shop around for a discount surgeon?
Recommended by LinkedIn
Of course not.
So why would a billion-dollar brand respect research that costs less than an average flight to Europe? And why would they respect the team that got them that data point in less time than that same flight? Deep down, why would a CEO or CFO respect and trust the data from a concept test that took less time to field than the delivery of a pizza?
This thought keeps echoing in my head since Thursday (though I admit it started on Tuesday night's Nyquil): In our rush to embrace and celebrate 1-hour concept tests, $3K idea screens, synthetic data, and “good enough” digital twins... Have we lost the respect of the C-suite?
We’ve gotten more efficient. But have we become less respected in the process?
If it did, research teams and budgets wouldn’t be shrinking. And seasoned pros wouldn’t be vanishing from org charts.
I love this industry. It’s given me purpose, community, and the ability to support my family. But in our pursuit of value through “faster and cheaper,” we may have accidentally signaled to executives that insights are transactional... and replaceable.
Here’s what I saw at IIEX: AI and tech companies are doing what they do best, driving efficiency.
But what if we invested in AI to drive our effectiveness so we can do what we do best? Help our partners make confident, strategic decisions.
Because that's what C-Suite executives truly want... Confidence.
Maybe it’s time we stop chasing AI that makes us faster… And start building AI that makes us more respected.
William, I think you are asking the wrong question. It has nothing to do with respect. It has to do with value. All the symptoms you outlined at the top of your article suppliers and insights leaders are experiencing are a result of the business not perceiving value from what they are receiving. Value and Respect aren’t primarily based on cost or time. While time and cost can signal value in some contexts, true respect in professional services comes from delivering meaningful impact. The fundamental question isn't whether something is fast or cheap, but whether it delivers reliable insights that drive business outcomes. You’re correct that C-Suite executives want confidence in insights. However, confidence stems from demonstrated impact, not lengthy timelines or large invoices. Research earns respect when it connects to business outcomes, delivers actionable recommendations, combines efficiency with methodological rigor, and adapts to the decision-making timeline of the business. The future belongs to researchers who leverage technology to deliver better insights more efficiently, not those who resist innovation to preserve artificial signals of value.
Marketing Research and Consumer Insights Strategist | Driving Business Innovation for 35+ Years
3dWell said. It has been, and always will be, about effectiveness. Time and cost have just been impediments, and reducing them is generally a good thing, but that's not what is going to save the profession from irrelevance.
Executive Vice President, Financial Advisor
4dWelcome to the party—those of us in Wealth Management have been navigating the fee compression conversation for over a decade, especially with the rise of robo-advisors. Yet even with all the automation and low-cost options, one thing remains true: when it comes to your money and long-term financial well-being, most clients still want to talk to a real person they trust. Data is critical, but so is context—and that’s where human insight still wins. 📈💻
I help Brands empathize with the Consumers they serve so they can make brilliant and relevant marketing (Former- P&G, McCormick) | Curiosity Champion | Servant | Auntie | Friend
4dGreat article, William Leach! I’ve been reflecting on this quite a bit lately, too. What I’ve observed over the years is that faster and cheaper can certainly drive decisions. However, the potentially negative impact of those quick, cost-efficient choices often doesn’t become apparent until long after the decision is made. By then, the marketer/leader who made the call has likely moved on to a new role—or even a new company—leaving others to manage the fallout. We’re undoubtedly at a critical juncture in the insights industry. In many ways, it’s pushed me to rethink how we ensure our clients not only understand the value of insights work but also appreciate how solid, human-informed insights work can get better over time. I truly believe that the most impactful insights are those that create a “moment”—a visceral experience that brings a data point to life and makes the recipient truly feel something. Thanks again for sparking this important conversation! It’s one we absolutely need to be having right now. 🙏🏾☑️
CEO @ The Sound | Market Research, Brand Strategy, Product Innovation
5dThanks for posting this William Leach and well said. The bottom line is always effectiveness. It doesn't matter how fast or cheap any of our work is. If it doesn't make a difference, doesn't positively change anything (unless the right answer is 'don't change') it just wasn't worth doing.