Dynamic Operations Modernisation,   can AI automation help in disruptive times?
Comical 1950's style cartoon of operations control room?

Dynamic Operations Modernisation, can AI automation help in disruptive times?


Reframing the Operating Model in a globally volatile era

Across every major industry — from healthcare and housing to manufacturing, finance, and logistics — organisations are grappling with a central truth: core operating models are being reshaped by global economic disruption at a scale not seen since the postwar industrial boom.


This is not simply a story of inflation or interest rates. It is a structural reordering of:

  • Trade access and supply chain continuity
  • Commodity pricing wars with cultural implications
  • Workforce availability and regulation
  • Service delivery expectations and public trust
  • Technology sovereignty and data ownership


Every enterprise — public or private — has a core operational framework made up of horizontal capabilities (e.g. workforce planning, service orchestration, asset management, HT, Technology) and vertical-specific processes (e.g. resources sales, patient journeys, procurement cycles, compliance workflows, supply chain delivery). These structures are under all under pressure from what might be called unplanned macro-economic political restructuring. Where the resulting paradigms are not yet set or predictable?


In these conditions the responsiveness of the corporate capabilities will be tested!

For modernising business remain resilient and responsive, organisations must now:

  • Understand which operational levers are most vulnerable to global volatility
  • Create systems that sense, simulate, and adapt to rapidly shifting inputs whether economic, environmental or even community based.
  • Business and organisations will move away from older static reporting models and move toward dynamic, intelligent operations systems. Reports and insight on demand?



So what is the role of Agentic-AI in this new operational frontier?


In this context, the rise of Agentic AI and the LLM ecosystems in enterprises and institutions alike has many characteristics worth looking at —

autonomous, goal-driven digital agents that can interact with complex systems and learn from feedback — offers a transformative frontier for rethinking how organisations achieve operational alignment with shifting economic, environmental and even community realities.

Rather than relying on static analytics or rigid top-down decision-making, agentic AI networks are set to employ:

  • Intent-driven feedback loops > Goals and targets accommodate more variables
  • Recursive planning and simulation models : few enterprises have agile iterative models in mind let alone the ability to run modelling on request with high levels of dependability. This type of data agility still exists in only a few deeper and more specialised industries scenarios. Eg: Manufacturing overproduction limitation modelling , portfolio finance or defence scenario modelling where budgets exist to support the outcomes.
  • Dynamic decision trees that can evaluate thousands of possible actions in real-time. This is an extension of the Data models and algorithms particular to operational functions. For example calculating Risk in Development geographies and locations against architecture/engineering designs, environmental factors and possible negative outcomes?
  • Analytical Quality Assurance measures and processes to match these new decision gateways: Will provide readability and organisational direction to the strength of system and solutions designs. Particularly critical where there are AI - human direct interactions in the model, how freeform might the responses be from an LLM and what level of performance trust is given to the ChatBot in various scenarios.

These agentic networks continuously re-optimise based on new data — whether it’s a spike in service demand, a regional supply shock, or a regulatory change — enabling operational strategies to flex at the pace of external disruption.



1. What Are Agentic-AI Networks?


Agentic AI networks differ from traditional rule-based systems by their ability to:

  • Autonomously interpret organizational goals
  • Act on behalf of humans within defined risk boundaries
  • Coordinate across multi-agent systems (MAS) for complex tasks like supply chain optimization, real-time staffing, or materials procurement

They integrate with:

  • Internal BI systems (Power BI, Tableau, Qlik)
  • External intelligence platforms (e.g., LinkedIn Economic Graph, IMF macro data, weather/climate APIs, National Customs/Import/Transport Data etc...)

Key Benefit: Agentic networks continuously re-evaluate operational paths via real-time decision trees, allowing for proactive and economically grounded pivots — particularly vital in volatile labour, trade environments and even morer local supply or agriculture.



2. Leveraging Third-Party Data and Market Signals


Agentic AI thrives on multi-source data ingestion and strategy. By incorporating external data layers, enterprises can tune operations not just to what has happened, but to what is likely to happen next.

Examples of 3rd Party Data Enrichment for Agentic Operations:

  • Geo-economic indicators from the World Bank or IMF (labour market elasticity, import-export ratios).
  • Policy watchlists from think tanks like Brookings or CSIS (e.g., pending legislation impacting aged care, health data privacy)
  • Commodity and climate risk feeds (e.g., ICE, NOAA, Refinitiv for mining/logistics sensitivity)

“Agentic networks must not just automate — as they can anticipate. That requires institutional memory, predictive data layering, and strong ethical oversight,” – Gartner (2024 Emerging Technologies Hype Cycle).

3. Decision Trees and Adaptive Planning Models


At the heart of Agentic AI is its ability to self-generate economic, environmental, even capacity based decision trees for real-time decisioning, which go far beyond traditional scenario planning.


Typical Agentic Decision Tree Nodes:

  • Trigger: e.g., disruption in iron ore export due to political unrest
  • Economic Evaluation: Adjust unit production or source from alternate suppliers
  • Labour Impact Assessment: Internal vs. outsourced reallocation costs
  • CSR & Compliance Check: Will this breach carbon targets or diversity pledges?
  • Action: Reconfigure production schedule, notify board via automated briefing


Real-world example: A build-to-rent construction firm uses an agentic network to auto-adjust procurement strategies based on:

  • Labour market saturation
  • Tariff changes in imported steel
  • Petroleum energy prices surge affecting import logistics
  • Local government housing incentives This results in a 20% faster decision cycle and 14% cost optimization over traditional manual planning.



4. Recommendations for Implementation

For organisations moving to more expressive but secure Operations Analytics there is a long list of Data and Enterprise architectures that are appropriate and still evolving.

  1. Establish an Agentic Data Mesh: Ensure that internal operational data is federated and tagged for agentic access and reasoning. With Oversight capability to establish accuracy and confidence gradients around the Quality assurance delivered over any agent activity. This is a substantial amount of Data Operations and Master Data Management work which is hopefully alreadyunderway.
  2. Deploy Controlled Agent Sandboxes: Allow agents to model decisions in isolated test environments before production in much the same way as Applications capabilities are part of a DevSecOps lifecycle, your Agentic Apps will also be given training wheels first, before being put into production scenarios.
  3. Invest in Explainable AI (xAI): Every agentic decision should be transparent and auditable — vital for compliance in regulated industries. This is also work that may be part of AI/LLM automation exercises and must have secure and safe observability frameworks and process in place.
  4. For complex decisioning Map Value-Impact Trees: Use BI tools to visualise cascading impacts of agentic decisions across workforce, cost, CSR, and stakeholder dimensions.



5. Looking ahead: Agentic AI as an Economic Co-Pilot


The evolution of agentic systems represents not just a technological leap, but a philosophical one: moving from enterprise command-and-control to economic sense-and-respond.

As governments shift toward localisation, regulation, and resilience-based policies, enterprises that embed agentic AI networks will gain:

  • Faster economic responsiveness
  • Deeper foresight into shifting labour-capital dynamics
  • Stronger alignment with national policy, regulatory alignments and CSR objectives


In summary

Most organisations are still teetering at the entry point of real Agentic benefits and value.

TEchnology companies and companies with strong technical IP are accelerating transfer of the manual process work of employees and personnel. Shortly, chaining the LLM value into multi-phased task management and Agent networks will mean that operational capabilities across larger and larger value chains will see larger and larger Agent and Agentic Network deployments. This is all very exciting but comes with risks in loose activity or late activity alike.

In design terms there are many challenges in this space. But considering that we already have moved from single agent to mutli-agent task management with quality assurance it is important to ensure that not only do we innovate in the use of AI Agent products but participate as deeply as possible to achieve ethical and balanced use of Agentic AI network functions and optimisations as we move towards the enterprises of tomorrow.


To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Michael Kirch

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics