Comprehensive Guide to Vulnerability Assessment Types & Methodologies
According to Statista reports, 21% of organizations in the UK claimed to have a data breach at least one-time a month, 24% reported a data breach less than once a month, and 18% reported witnessing a data breach once every week. Thus, securing data and systems in the digital world has become paramount for organizations across every possible industry. But this is where the scope for vulnerability assessments comes in! The critical steps of a vulnerability assessment are finding, categorizing, and remedying security vulnerabilities which potentially may be exploited by cyber threats.
This guide will discuss the vulnerability assessment types & methodologies, selection methods, advanced security measures, and tools used to better contribute to informed decision-making and risk mitigation for organizations.
What is Vulnerability Assessment?
Vulnerability assessment is a systematic process of identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing the security weaknesses in systems, networks, and applications. The process involves
Verizon's 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report indicates that 14% of data breaches were initiated by exploitation of the vulnerabilities. Thus, routine vulnerability assessments offer critical insights into an organization's security posture, enabling proactive defenses to reduce attack surfaces, prevent breaches, and meet all the important regulations, including PCI DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Types and Methodologies of Vulnerability Assessments
Understanding the types of vulnerability assessments helps organizations identify and correct network security areas for application robustness. Here are some of the most common vulnerability assessments:
1. Network-Based VulnerabilityAssessment
Network-based vulnerability assessment is the identification, analysis, and mitigation of security weaknesses in a corporate network. The aim is to find vulnerabilities like malware, DDoS, or brute-force attacks that may let attackers breach the organization's network infrastructure.
Testing Methods
Methodology
Network Vulnerability Scan Planning and Design (1–10 days): Begin with an objective definition for the vulnerability assessment, such as network segmentation checks, malware scanning, or preparedness testing for audits like HIPAA. List network segments and software to scan and then select a vulnerability assessment tool that supports the bypass of network firewall rules when needed. For internet-exposed segments, execute an external scan; otherwise, create an internal scan for the internal corporate network. Then, schedule the scan during off-peak hours.
Configuring the Scan (~1 day): Define target IPs and assign these to hardware or software assets. Then, append the addresses to the vulnerability assessment tool. It will scan the network for open ports using protocols (TCP, UDP) to target. Set scan aggressiveness to medium to achieve maximum thoroughness and stability with no complete network disruption. Configure scan duration and enable notification for completion and critical findings.
Scanning for Vulnerabilities (1–5 days): Run the automatic scan with manual tweaks when needed. The use of a combination of automated and manual scanning ensures that even the slightest information gets captured while not burdening the resources dedicated to the network, focusing on the accuracy of the details about vulnerabilities.
Analysis of Scan Results (1–3 days): Analyse the findings to reduce false positives and confirm the real vulnerabilities. Then, perform the root cause analysis and obtain the impact for each vulnerability, ranking the problems based on their risk. Simulated real-life attacks through penetration testing may be recommended for understanding the deep security of the network.
Reporting the Vulnerabilities Discovered (1–2 days): Prepare an executive summary with project highlights, along with a more detailed report, listing the vulnerabilities with their descriptions, categorization by criticality and risks, and recommended remediation steps. Include vulnerability assessment methodology and tools for transparency and review with all stakeholders for informed security improvements.
2. Host-Based Vulnerability Assessment
A host-based vulnerability assessment is very essential for finding loopholes in the security of individual host systems, such as servers, workstations, and laptops. These scans identify vulnerabilities in operating systems, applications, and services, including web servers, file storage, databases, and directories that remotely support them.
Methodology
System Identification and Configuration (1-2 days): This step involves discovering the OS of the host system, which application is running in it, and what is installed on the system. It may include service types such as HTTP, FTP, DNS, and database servers.
Vulnerability Scanning (3-5 days): An automatic Nessus, OpenVAS, or Qualys host-based tool will scan the system hosts for known vulnerabilities. They will check for missing patches like CVE identifiers, NVD, outdated software versions, and possible misconfigurations and services such as SMB and Telnet.
Risk Analysis and Reporting (2-3 days): After automated scanning, manual scans will be performed by security experts for accurate analysis. After that, a vulnerability assessment report of the system will be generated with predefined security knowledge (e.g., CVE, CWE, NVD). The tools will compare these knowledge bases against the vulnerabilities of the system, analyze all the possible risks - either at critical, lower level threats, or exploitable weaknesses, and suggest the necessary patches or configurations for reduced risk against potential cyber-attacks.
3. Application-Based Vulnerability Assessment
An application vulnerability assessment is crucial for identifying and mitigating security risks in software applications, such as websites, mobile apps and APIs. This process helps detect vulnerabilities like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), and other threats outlined in the OWASP Top 10. By assigning severity levels to each risk, it recommends remediation steps for enhanced security.
Methodology
Preparation (1-2 days): Define the scope of the vulnerability assessment and identify key application components such as the front-end, back-end, databases, and authentication mechanisms. Gather relevant data like source code, configuration files, access control lists, user roles, and any third-party integrations or libraries that may be involved in the application.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Automated Scanning (2-3 days): The scan utilizes a combination of dynamic analysis (DAST) and static analysis (SAST) techniques. OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite are commonly used vulnerability assessment tools for automated scanning. They detect common vulnerabilities from the list of OWASP Top 10 Risks 2021 ranking, including the following:
These tools scan for known weaknesses by reviewing code, network traffic, and server configurations. However, manual scans are performed to detect complex vulnerabilities like Insecure Design (A04:2021) or Server-Side Request Forgery (A10:2021), which automated tools might miss.
Analysis and Reporting (2-3 days): Document the findings, categorize vulnerabilities based on severity, and propose remediation strategies.
4. API-Based Vulnerability Assessment
API vulnerability assessment aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities in HTTP and other protocol APIs. It scrutinizes an API's design, implementation, and deployment aspects, looking for weaknesses or design/implementation flaws to achieve robust security and resilience. This vulnerability assessment is done based on a continuously developed model which in most cases gets integrated with the DevOps pipelines for continuous feedback.
Methodology
API Endpoint Discovery and Threat Modelling (1-2 hours): Vulnerability assessment tools like OpenAPI and Postman Collections identify all API endpoints along with their specifications and show possible attack paths emanating from the API design and functional usage.
Automated Asset Scanning (2-6 hours): Upon being deployed, Seeker® and Continuous Dynamic™ scan every API route and endpoint for possible vulnerabilities in real-time.
Fuzz Testing & Vulnerability Scanning (2-3 hours): Input invalid, unexpected, or random data into the system for eliciting bugs and simulating the behavior of potential attackers against the platform. It exposes security vulnerabilities that are not commonly known. With a combination of automated tools and manual testing, the following OWASP API Top 10 vulnerabilities are scanned and detected:
Compliance Validation and Reporting (2-3 hours): Provide a detailed report on discovered vulnerabilities along with fixes and mitigation strategies. Ensure the API is compliant with the standards of the industry like OpenAPI Specifications.
5. Wireless Vulnerability Assessment
Wireless networks are integral to modern communication but come with inherent security risks. A comprehensive wireless network vulnerability assessment helps identify vulnerabilities caused due to misconfigured Wireless Intrusion Detection Systems (WIDS), Access Control Lists (ACLs), encryption methods such as WPA2 or WPA3, or authentication mechanisms like 802.1x. This type of vulnerability assessment uses a mix of active and passive techniques. Active testing includes simulated attacks, while network traffic analysis falls under passive techniques.
Methodology
Advanced Techniques for Effective Vulnerability Assessments
Organizations can further increase their vulnerability assessments by implementing more modern and advanced techniques:
1. Contextual Risk Analysis
Conduct vulnerability assessments using Bayesian inference models, combining asset value data, Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) scores, and exploit probability metrics. This approach quantifies potential impact based on threat intelligence, enabling organizations to focus on high-risk vulnerabilities.
2. CI/CD Code Review
Integrate static analysis security testing (SAST) tools such as SonarQube and Checkmarx within CI/CD pipelines using REST APIs. These tools enforce coding standards and conduct automated scans for CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) identifiers and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities before deployment, ensuring continuous security hygiene.
3. Behavioural Analytics
Use advanced statistical models and machine learning algorithms (e.g., K-means clustering, principal component analysis) to monitor baseline system behavior and flag deviations. It is crucial to detect insider threats through anomalous access patterns, lateral movement, and unusual privilege escalations in host-based security systems.
Conclusion
Periodic vulnerability assessments are required to detect security threats and rectify them. Proper selection of the methodologies of vulnerability assessment along with other modern techniques would ensure a holistic and wholesome security strategy for an organization.