Comparing and Contrasting McCabe's Cyclomatic Complexity and Halstead's Complexity
Image Source: unsplash.com

Comparing and Contrasting McCabe's Cyclomatic Complexity and Halstead's Complexity

McCabe's Cyclomatic Complexity and Halstead's Complexity are two software metrics that are used to measure the complexity of a program. These metrics help software developers and engineers understand the complexity of their code and identify potential problem areas that may require refactoring or optimization.

McCabe's Cyclomatic Complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. It is calculated by determining the number of control structures, such as if-then statements and loops, in a program and adding one. The resulting number represents the minimum number of test cases needed to adequately test the program.

For example, consider the following simple program in Python:

def calculate_sum(n):

  sum = 0
 
  for i in range(n):

    sum += i

  return sum         

This program has a McCabe's Cyclomatic Complexity of 2, because it has one loop (the for statement) and one return statement.

Halstead's Complexity, on the other hand, measures the amount of mental effort required to understand and maintain a program. It is calculated by counting the number of unique operators and operands used in a program, as well as the total number of occurrences of each. The resulting numbers are used to calculate several complexity measures, including the program's volume, difficulty, and effort.

For example, consider the following program in C:


#include <stdio.h>

 int main(int argc, char** argv){

  int x = 5;

  int y = 10;

  int sum = x + y;

  printf("The sum is %d\n", sum);

 return 0;

}         

This program has a Halstead's Complexity of 9, because it uses 3 unique operators (the assignment operator (=), the addition operator (+), and the printf () and 6 unique operands (x, y, sum, 5, 10, and "The sum is %d\n").

In summary, McCabe's Cyclomatic Complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code, while Halstead's Complexity measures the mental effort required to understand and maintain a program. Both metrics can be useful in understanding the complexity of a program and identifying potential problem areas, but they approach complexity from different angles and should be used together for a more complete understanding.

Credits: Written with support from OpenAI Assistant

Torsten Knodt

Principal System and Software Architect with V-Model experience, specializing in automotive engineering, embedded software, model-based engineering, ASPICE, functional safety, and cybersecurity.

2y

Great summary. In which way did the AI assistant support you?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Jayadev Meka

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics