E-commerce web projects often suffer from budget overruns and timeline delays, influenced not only by project management but also by the chosen technology stack.
This analysis compares React, Angular, PHP (front-end use via CMS like Magento/WooCommerce), Python (Django/Flask), and .NET (ASP.NET) on:
Project success vs failure tendencies
Developer salary and hiring challenges
Licensing and cost implications
Total cost of ownership (TCO)
1. Project Failure Tendencies by Stack
🔷 Angular
High complexity and steep learning curve.
Projects often suffer when developers are inexperienced.
Used heavily in enterprise projects, but misuse in small projects increases cost/timeline risk.
Shortage of Angular developers in some markets delays recruitment and inflates salaries.
Popular in governments/banks/legacy enterprise apps, but slowly losing traction in startups.
🔷 React
More flexible, lower entry barrier.
Easier to recruit, massive open-source community.
Many successful e-commerce companies use React (Shopify frontend, etc.).
Being a library, not a full framework, it may require more architectural decisions—but allows gradual upgrades.
More resilient to budget and time failure than Angular when team lacks deep front-end expertise.
🔷 PHP
Popular through platforms like WordPress/WooCommerce, Magento.
Fast development for small to mid-size projects, especially with templated CMS tools.
Prone to technical debt and maintainability issues at scale.
Projects often fail when scope isn't clearly defined or managed (Magento cases).
Extremely low-cost developers; however, quality can vary significantly.
🔷 Python
Rapid development with Django/Flask.
Common in data-heavy applications, though less dominant on front-end.
Performance is sometimes lower than PHP for simple rendering; scaling may need optimization.
Python developers are generally expensive but versatile, often spanning data and backend roles.
No major pattern of project failure specifically linked to the technology.
🔷 .NET
Strong tooling, suited for complex enterprise apps.
Project failures usually tied to scope or management, not technology.
Higher initial setup complexity may lead to slower ramp-up.
Historically involved licensing (Windows Server, SQL Server), though .NET Core now mitigates that.
Note: Salary ranges are approximate averages for mid-to-senior developers in 2023–2025.
3. Budget & Timeline Risks
4. Other Cost Factors
5. Final Insights
React offers a balanced mix of flexibility, maintainability, and talent availability. For most modern e-commerce projects, it's the safest choice in terms of avoiding failures.
Angular suits large enterprise apps but carries high risk when used with underprepared teams.
PHP remains cost-effective and rapid for smaller projects, but requires strong discipline to scale without maintenance issues.
Python can be a great choice when advanced backend logic or AI integration is needed.
.NET excels in complex enterprise settings but requires careful scope management and planning to avoid overruns.
📚 Full Source List
Odeniran, Q. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Fullstack Development Technologies. Thesis.
SSA Group. (2021). Factors to Consider When Choosing a Frontend Framework.
Synsoft Global. (2024). Angular 2024: Rising to New Heights or Facing Challenges?
Bluelight Consulting. (2025). React Developer Salary Outlook 2025.
Anywhere Club. (2023). PHP vs Python: A Complete Comparative Guide.
iProgrammer. (2023). Programming Languages: Love and Money (Stack Overflow Survey Analysis).
LinkedIn (Trivedi, P.). (2023). When Could Magento 2 Projects Go Wrong?
The Frontend Company. (2025). Angular to React Migration: Switch Fast & Easy.
Flexisource IT. (2021). PHP vs Python vs Java vs ASP.NET vs Ruby – A Developer’s Guide.
