Bridging the Gap: A Practical Guide to Platform Engineering for IT Decision Makers
Platform engineering is becoming increasingly significant, yet IT decision-makers and operations leaders often struggle to connect it to their existing practices. The emphasis on methodologies like "platform as a product" and "team topologies" can feel disconnected from the day-to-day technical and operational realities. This article clarifies the core technical aspects of platform engineering, explains how it adapts to industry-specific requirements, and outlines a practical path for transitioning from DevOps-driven practices to platform engineering.
Technical Foundations of Platform Engineering
Platform engineering builds on established technical principles, enhancing developer efficiency and operational scalability. It is built around several core components.
First, container orchestration is central to platform engineering. Tools like Kubernetes enable teams to manage containerized workloads at scale, automating processes and eliminating manual intervention in deployments. These tools provide the flexibility needed to adapt to changing workloads without introducing unnecessary complexity.
Next, self-service portals like Backstage or Red Hat Developer Hub empower developers by making infrastructure resources readily accessible. These platforms streamline common workflows, enabling developers to provision environments, deploy applications, or access documentation independently.
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools such as Terraform and Ansible further automate the provisioning and management of infrastructure. By defining infrastructure configurations as code, organizations can ensure consistency across environments, reduce errors, and quickly replicate setups when needed.
A well-engineered platform must also integrate observability tools, such as Prometheus, Grafana, and OpenTelemetry, to ensure visibility into system performance. These tools enable teams to detect and resolve issues proactively, improving reliability and supporting better decision-making.
Lastly, platforms must embed security and compliance features. This includes role-based access control, policy enforcement, and compliance monitoring to ensure that platforms meet organizational and regulatory requirements without adding unnecessary friction to development workflows.
Adapting to Industry Realities
No two organizations operate under the same conditions. Platform engineering must account for differences in legacy systems, regulatory constraints, and organizational goals.
Many organizations rely on legacy systems that remain critical to their operations. While these systems often lack modern features, replacing them outright may be impractical. Instead, platform engineering should prioritize integration and modernization strategies that extend the value of legacy systems while gradually introducing newer technologies.
In heavily regulated industries such as healthcare and finance, compliance requirements heavily influence platform design. Regulations like HIPAA or GDPR impose strict controls on data handling and auditing, which platforms must support seamlessly to reduce the compliance burden on teams.
Additionally, an organization’s existing technology investments shape its platform strategy. For example, companies with commitments to specific cloud providers or hybrid solutions like OpenShift need platforms that integrate smoothly with those environments, preserving previous investments while providing a foundation for future growth.
Finally, organizational scale and complexity impact platform priorities. Startups often require platforms that support rapid iteration and speed, while enterprises need platforms capable of managing large, distributed teams and workloads efficiently.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Transitioning to Platform Engineering
Moving from a DevOps-driven approach to platform engineering requires a thoughtful and incremental process. This transition blends technical and cultural changes to create lasting results.
The first step is to assess your current environment. Document workflows, identify bottlenecks, and solicit feedback from developers and operators. This process provides a baseline understanding of where inefficiencies and pain points exist, making it easier to prioritize areas for improvement.
With a clear understanding of the current state, it’s important to define the platform’s objectives. Determine what problems the platform is meant to solve and align these goals with broader business needs. Whether the priority is reducing deployment times, enhancing visibility, or streamlining compliance, clarity of purpose helps ensure alignment and focus.
Rather than overhauling everything at once, it’s best to start with a small, high-impact project. For instance, automate a repetitive developer task like environment provisioning. Demonstrating tangible benefits through quick wins builds confidence in the platform and encourages adoption.
To support this transition, organizations should adopt modern team structures. A dedicated Platform Team builds and maintains the platform, while Stream-Aligned Teams use it to deliver value. Enabling Teams can assist by helping others adopt platform tools and workflows. This structure ensures that responsibilities are clear and teams can collaborate effectively.
Finally, iterative improvement is key. Use metrics and feedback to refine the platform continuously, addressing new challenges and opportunities as they arise. This approach helps the platform evolve to meet changing needs while staying aligned with organizational goals.
Successful platform engineering hinges on a few guiding principles
Focus on developers: The platform should minimize developer workload by abstracting unnecessary complexity and simplifying workflows. Empowering developers to work more efficiently directly impacts productivity and satisfaction.
Balance standardization with flexibility: Platforms must offer consistent tools and workflows while allowing for customization where needed. This balance enables teams to operate efficiently without feeling constrained.
Adopt a feedback-driven approach: Measure key metrics like adoption rates, developer satisfaction, and deployment times to track progress and identify areas for improvement. Continuous feedback ensures that the platform remains relevant and effective.
Foster collaboration: Platform engineering requires close alignment across development, operations, and security teams. Breaking down silos and encouraging a culture of shared responsibility ensures that the platform meets the needs of all stakeholders.
Platform engineering doesn’t require abandoning traditional practices. Instead, it builds on existing foundations while introducing modern tools and methodologies to address new challenges. By combining technical best practices with a focus on organizational needs, IT decision-makers can create platforms that are scalable, secure, and developer-friendly.
You can start today: Assess your current workflows and identify one area where a platform engineering approach could make an immediate impact. Build incrementally and iteratively, keeping your organizational goals in focus.
Learn more: