Bank Failures: Bail-Out or Bail-In, Either Way, You Could Lose

Most people have heard of a bail-out. However, many have probably never heard of a bail-in.

A bank bail-in is a process by which a failing bank's creditors, including depositors, are forced to bear some of the cost of the bank's rescue. This is typically done by converting a portion of the bank's debt, such as bonds or deposits, into equity in the bank. A bank bail-in is considered an alternative to a traditional bank bailout, in which the government or other external entity provides financial assistance to the failing bank.

The concept of bank bail-ins first emerged in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, when governments around the world bailed out several major banks to prevent their collapse. However, the cost of these bailouts was significant, and many policymakers and regulators began to explore alternative ways to resolve failing banks. The idea of a bail-in was proposed as a way to make creditors and shareholders, rather than taxpayers, bear the cost of a bank's rescue.

If you live in the United States, you probably feel that your money is safe - it’s protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC maintains the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), which is used to pay insurance claims in the event of a bank failure. Therefore, you’re only at risk if you have more than $250,000 on deposit at the bank.

But did you know that the FDIC is only required to maintain a reserve ratio of 1.35%, which means that the DIF must have at least $1.35 in reserve for every $100 of insured deposits?

If Bank of America or Wells Fargo failed, there would not be enough money in the DIF to cover all depositors. Therefore, the FDIC has adopted bail-in as a resolution plan to deal with failing banks [watch The FDIC Just Gave A DIRE Warning to All Americans].

The main risk posed by bank bail-ins to depositors is that their deposits may be converted into equity in the failing bank. This means that depositors may lose some or all of their deposits and may not be able to access their funds for an extended period of time. In addition, depositors may also see a significant decline in the value of their deposits, as the new equity in the bank may be worth less than the original deposit.

Another risk posed by bank bail-ins is that they may lead to a loss of confidence in the banking system. If depositors believe that their deposits are at risk in the event of a bank failure, they may be less likely to keep their money in the bank. This could lead to a run on the bank, as depositors withdraw their funds in an effort to protect them from a potential bail-in. This could exacerbate the problems of the failing bank, and potentially lead to a broader financial crisis.

There is also a risk that bank bail-ins could disproportionately impact certain groups of depositors. For example, depositors with small account balances may be more vulnerable to losing a significant portion of their savings in a bail-in, as they may not have the resources to pursue legal action to recover their funds. Additionally, depositors in countries with weaker legal protections may be at greater risk of losing their deposits in a bail-in, as they may have fewer legal avenues to challenge the decision.

Additionally, bank bail-ins may also lead to a reduction in the availability of credit, as creditors may be less willing to lend to banks that they believe may be at risk of a bail-in. This can lead to a decline in economic activity, as businesses and households have less access to credit to fund their operations and investments.

To mitigate these risks, policymakers and regulators have implemented several measures to protect depositors in the event of a bank bail-in. One of these measures is deposit insurance, which can compensate depositors for a portion of their deposits in the event of a bank failure. Additionally, some regulators have implemented rules to ensure that bail-ins are only applied to creditors and shareholders, and not to depositors with small account balances.

Furthermore, some countries have implemented measures such as bail-in tool (bail-in debt) that can be used as a buffer to absorb losses in case of a bank failure. These measures can be used to ensure that the costs of a bank failure are borne by the bank's shareholders and bondholders, rather than by depositors.

In conclusion, a bank bail-in is a process by which a failing bank's creditors, including depositors, are forced to bear some of the cost of the bank's rescue. While bail-ins are considered as an alternative to a traditional bank bailout, they pose several risks to depositors. The first risk is that depositors may not be fully aware of the risks associated with bail-in and may not have taken steps to diversify their savings across several banks. For example, depositors may not realize that their deposits may be subject to bail-in if the bank becomes insolvent and that they may lose access to funds during the bail-in process.

It's important for regulators to carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks of bail-in before implementing it as a resolution tool, and to ensure that depositors are fully protected during the process.

#centralbanks #banks #banking #riskmanagement #insurance #crypto #cryptocurrencies