12 Ways to Reduce Contingent Workforce Program Costs
Contingent Workforce Program Managers: Are You Unlocking Every Cost Saving Opportunity?
As economic pressures mount, program managers are under growing scrutiny to demonstrate cost efficiency, without sacrificing talent quality or operational performance.
My most recent article breaks down 12 strategies to reduce costs across your contingent workforce programme, each with real-world examples and simple savings calculations you can apply immediately.
Here’s a taste:
From shifting long-term staff augmentation to SOWs, to capturing unclaimed rebates, or negotiating discounts for faster payment terms, this is a must-read playbook for any contingent workforce program manager looking to build a leaner, smarter contingent workforce program.
Here’s what’s covered, complete with sample calculations, in the full article:
Learn how to measure actual savings, optimise supplier relationships, and align your strategy with finance...without losing sight of quality.
Read my full article here: https://bit.ly/4imnhaI
NOTE: Our CCWP Certification class has an entire module on Pricing & Cost Management Strategies...you can find out more and register for a class here
CEO at DeUS Tech Services |GCC setup |Transformation by AI | Digital Transformation | SAP | Salesforce
1wthis was amazing but like after 12 sun-sign there is 13th way as well ..lets discuss about that some time :-)
Thanks, Peter. Nicely written article that every Contingent Workforce Program Manager can benefit from.
Chief Sales Officer @ Malt
3wHi Peter, Thanks a lot for sharing your insights, this answer a global challenge for most CW leaders. I was wondering, do you have any more granular approach to differentiate saving potential : - for white versus blue collar - within white collar (IT versus non IT) - for core versus contextual activities Lower cost location became a norm today for RUN activities but when it comes to build phase on core activities, it also can hinder real-time communication, cultural & language barriers leading to misunderstandings, complex logistical challenges that lead to end late project delivery and impact business. Also, the lever about moving the Staff augmentation to SOW, this requires a strong change management and hiring manager enablement in their capacity to scope task and project. In short, in those two levers, I wonder what the horizon : - for location :might be a short term saving but that can actually generate long term more spend if the activities are not well chosen (build Vs run Vs Core on IT for ex) - SA to SOW : This can be a good long term lever, I agree but maybe not answering 2025 high stake because from my experience you can't drive this organisational transformation of your souring in 1 day.
Simplifying Complex Workforce Processes for Faster, Smarter Hiring & Onboarding | Turning Job Search Stress Into Success: Resumes, LinkedIn Profiles & Cover Letters That Work.
3wGreat article. Building a single source of truth (e.g., workforce dashboard) that consolidates data across CW, FTE, and SOW to evaluate total labor spend would be a good option for cross-channel visibility.