11 Best Website Testing Tools in 2024

Every website must undergo thorough testing, without exception, to minimize defects and vulnerabilities that can potentially distract users and harm the site’s overall reputation.

But which web testing tools should we use? In this issue, we’ll review the 11 best website testing tools in 2024.

Top 11 Website Testing Tools

Drawing upon 8-plus years of experience in QA and a diverse project portfolio, we have compiled a list of web testing tools to help you select the one that aligns best with your testing requirements. Let’s dive in! 

1. BrowserStack

BrowserStack offers three solutions for website testing to QA experts: Live (for cross-browser testing), Automate (for Selenium testing), and Percy (for visual testing). 

Our QA engineers used BrowserStack to thoroughly test Penpot on Firefox, Chrome, and Safari. We paid special attention to various Safari versions, addressing bugs that surfaced in older ones. 

Price: From $29/user/month

Pros:

• Instant access to 3000+ real devices and browsers
• Increased visual coverage
• Real-time debugging
• Running tests in parallel
• High security and privacy
• Responsive design testing
• Screenshot testing
• Website speed testing
• Integration with GitHub, Jira, Slack, Selenium, TestProject, Netlify, and more
• Free trial

Cons:

• May be relatively expensive (pricing depends on your specific needs)
• No option to add custom devices

2. Apache JMeter

Originally, Apache JMeter, an open-source Java application, was designed for testing web applications. Since then, its set of features has expanded, enabling QA professionals to conduct load tests on functional behavior, simulate heavy loads, and measure performance under various load conditions.

QAwerk used Apache JMeter when conducting load testing for the Couple Up! mobile game. 

Price: Free

Pros:

• Support for both static and dynamic resources
• Compatibility with various applications, servers, and protocols (HTTP, HTTPS, etc.)
• Test plan recording, construction, and debugging
• Ability to conduct load tests from any Java-compatible operating system
• Dynamic HTML reporting
• Data extraction capabilities from HTML, JSON, XML, or any textual format
• Complete portability
• Comprehensive multithreading framework
• Caching and offline analysis/replaying of test results
• Availability of data analysis and visualization plugins

Cons:

• Some browser-supported actions cannot be executed
• It’s crucial to verify the integrity of downloaded files using signatures obtained from the main distribution directories
• It may be difficult for novice testers to use

3. Selenium 

Selenium is an open-source software, providing three solutions that QA experts can utilize. Selenium WebDriver enables the creation of browser-based regression automation suites and tests, as well as the ability to scale and distribute scripts across various environments.

Price: Free

Pros:

• Test case creation
• Test automation
• Bug reproduction script development
• Script creation for automation-assisted exploratory testing
• Running tests in parallel
• Cross-platform testing
• Test debugging
• Reusable test cases
• Plugin support
• Load balancing

Cons:

• No reporting feature
• No image comparison feature
• No support for codeless testing

4. Chrome DevTools

Chrome DevTools is an entire set of web developer tools built into Google Chrome that allows for website iteration and debugging. These tools are free to use and offer numerous features that QA experts can benefit from.

Price: Free

Pros:

• Device orientation simulation
• JavaScript debugging
• Website speed optimization
• Debugging progressive web apps
• Testing HTTPS implementation
• Identifying and fixing memory issues
• Detecting performance bottlenecks
• Inspecting CSS grids
• Inspecting animations
• Detecting cookie and mixed content issues

Cons:

• High memory usage
• May be too complex for novice developers and testers due to its intricate layout and wide range of functions

5. Postman

Postman is a platform that accelerates and simplifies the API lifecycle, enabling you to create APIs faster and more effectively. The platform provides a comprehensive set of tools that you can leverage for API testing, designing API specifications, generating documentation, creating mock servers, monitoring API performance, and capturing requests and responses. QAwerk relied on Postman when manually testing the Union54 RESTful API.

Price: Free

Pros:

• Writing test scripts
• Using snippets
• Testing collections and folders
• Building APIs
• Deploying APIs
• Capturing HTTP requests
• Generating reports
• Receiving security warnings
• Utilizing the automatic documentation feature
• Setting up mock servers

Cons:

• May be complex for new users
• Limited automation capabilities

6. JUnit 

JUnit is a widely-used open-source testing framework for Java applications, designed to facilitate automated testing and ensure code reliability throughout the software development process. It includes a collection of annotations and assertions that make writing and running tests easier.

Price: Free

Pros:

• Supports testing with multiple input values
• Integration with popular IDEs and build tools
• Parallel testing
• Test lifecycle control
• Integration with code coverage tools
• Immediate test reporting
• Active community for troubleshooting and updates
• Early-stage bug detection in code
• Optimal for test-driven development environments

Cons:

• Designed only for Java applications
• Limited support for complex testing scenarios

7. NUnit 

NUnit is a popular open-source testing framework designed for the .NET platform, specifically tailored for automated unit testing of software applications written in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.NET. It’s absolutely free, making it a trusted ally in the quest for bulletproof software.

Price: Free

Pros:

• Cross-platform compatibility
• Parameterized tests
• Parallel test execution
• Support for data-driven testing
• Integration with CI/CD
• Human-readable test cases
• Quick feedback on code changes
• Supports multiple .NET languages
• Powerful assertion library
• Integration with popular mocking frameworks

Cons:

• Can be challenging for newcomers
• Limited to .NET environments
• Small community

8. TestNG

TestNG, short for “Next Generation,” is a widely-used Java testing framework. It allows you to generate comprehensive test reports, making it easy to track the number of passed, failed, and skipped test cases.

Price: Free

Pros:

• Parallel test execution
• Flexible test configuration
• Data-driven testing
• Integration with popular IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA
• Categorizing tests into groups for selective execution
• Built-in mechanism for automatically retrying failed tests
• Built-in reporting
• Strong community
• Supports various test types
• Test prioritization

Cons:

• Java-centric
• Limited integrated development environment (IDE) support

9. Mocha

Mocha is a JavaScript testing framework designed to work on both Node.js and web browsers. It offers a rich set of features for creating descriptive automated tests, generating reports, and even running tests automatically whenever a local file is modified.

Price: Free

Pros:

• Simple setup
• Cross-browser testing
• Generating XML reports compatible with JUnit for integration with CI/CD tools
• Test isolation
• Browser and Node.js support
• Active community with continuous support
• ECMAScript 6 (ES6) support
• Test skipping
• Offers hooks for setup and teardown: before, after, beforeEach, and afterEach
• Async testing

Cons:

• Limited mocking
• Plugin overload

10. PyUnit

PyUnit, also known as the unittest framework, is the default testing framework included with Python, so it’s often the first choice for developers. It offers features like fixtures, test cases, test suites, and a test runner for automated code testing. With PyUnit, developers can group related test cases into suites that share the same fixtures.

Price: Free

Pros:

• Included in Python’s standard library, no external installations needed
• Automatic test discovery
• Test isolation
• Fixture setup and teardown for shared resources
• Parameterized testing
• Test report generation, including XML reports and unittest-xml-reporting
• Custom test loaders
• Integration with CI/CD
• Adherence to Python’s coding style and conventions
• Regression testing

Cons:

• Involves excessive boilerplate code
• Abstraction in test code can obscure intent

11. RSpec

RSpec is a testing framework designed specifically for Ruby. Developed by Dave Astels in 2005, RSpec is tailored for behavior-driven development (BDD).

Price: Free

Pros:

• Human-readable syntax
• Detailed test failure messages
• Parallel test execution
• Integrates with Ruby on Rails
• Highly extensible through plugins and custom extensions
• Selective test execution with tags and filters
• Extensive built-in and custom matchers
• Easy mocking and stubbing of objects
• Modular testing
• Custom formatters

Cons:

• Limited language support
• Verbose syntax

Summing Up

Remember that website testing should not be a one-time occurrence but an ongoing priority. Test, retest and then test your website again to ensure it remains functional at all times. With the right web application testing tools in place, developers can build reliable websites that meet user expectations and provide a smooth browsing experience.

At QAwerk, we have a team of skilled testers who can refine your website before its public release, establish an efficient QA process for seamless delivery, and identify bugs early on. Reach out to us, and you’ll discover how we can add significant value to your product.

FAQ about Website Testing

1. What is Website Testing?

Website testing is a process of evaluating your website for bugs, security issues, regressions, and performance bottlenecks before it becomes available to the general public.

2. What are Types of Website Testing?

Providing a seamless and inclusive web experience often requires several testing types, such as functional testing, user acceptance testing, performance testing, security testing, usability testing, cross-browser testing, integration testing, cloud testing, and API testing.

3. What is the Main Reason for Using Website Testing Tools?

The primary purpose of using website testing software is to ensure the quality and reliability of a website or web application by identifying and addressing issues, improving performance, and enhancing the overall user experience.

4. What are Common Web Testing Issues?

Testers typically face 5 common challenges, including quality testing, security, performance, usability, and integration.

Thanks for reading! If you found this newsletter helpful, share it with your network and stay tuned for more insights on QA and Software Development!