Suzanne Elder’s Post

View profile for Suzanne Elder

Advocate, Analyst, Equity Architect

The recent decision to remove information regarding clinical trial diversity and health equity from the FDA website is concerning. Despite this setback, the industry's focus on clinical trial strategies and equity priorities is unlikely to shift significantly. The emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion is not solely driven by altruism; it is also a sound business practice. As Eleanor Roosevelt aptly stated, "When it's better for everyone, it's better for everyone."

Gene Shackman, PhD

Director at Global Social Change Research Project

2mo

Maybe phrase it a different way, that still means the same thing, and put it in dollars words. Ask that clinical trials be representative of the population, as representativeness is the cornerstone of all research. If the sample is not representative of the population, then conclusions from the study cannot be generalized to the population. And you can only draw conclusions about sub-populations when you have enough in the sample. -Then- whoever does those types of clinical trials can say, we now know the correct dose for XYZ population because we used representative samples of those populations. That's a marketing plus. Your treatment can be more tailored to -you-. You can get more personalized treatment. Because, you see, we care about -you-. That can now be the marketing approach, if they have representative samples for each sub-population.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics