Qneiform’s Post

View organization page for Qneiform

1,754 followers

🎄 🎁 Back in the 90s, the term ‘Tiger Cubs’ came to refer to hedge funds founded by individuals who had worked at Julian Robertson’s Tiger Management. Equally, in the tech world similar multigenerational phenomena are observed (see the Paypal or Skype ‘mafias’). The same is true (although arguably to a lesser extent – potentially due to the longer half-life of investments and scale-related barriers to entry inherent to private investing), within private equity.   👀 Francisco Partners is one of the more successful examples. Founded by individuals from TPG and TA Associates in 1999, it was one of the first firms to focus specifically on technology buyouts. 💼 Its hiring practices perhaps say more about the relative strengths of banking franchises than anything else, with Morgan Stanley contributing three times as many junior professionals as any other bank (MS historically had an incredibly strong franchise in Menlo Park before losing multiple key individuals more recently). Equally, when bringing in buyside professionals, it’s no surprise that Silverlake (another 2nd generation SF headquartered tech PE fund founded in 1999) is the top source of talent. 🔎 Like many US firms, it demonstrates a bias towards very junior talent, with 43% of the team with less than 3 years’ experience. Somewhat atypically for US funds is the tendency to develop junior talent into leaders within the firm, with 67% of MDs having joined as junior professionals.   📊 For a west-coast firm it exhibits a peculiar tendency to hire from typical east-coast schools for its SF office and then demonstrate the exact opposite elsewhere. Across NY and London, typical stalwarts Harvard and Wharton (1 and 2 , respectively, in SF) don’t feature in the top-20 undergraduate schools at all (oddly, neither does Oxford) with Wharton just about making it onto the post-graduate top-10 in (9th place).

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics