Marc Vales’ Post

View profile for Marc Vales

Vice-Président Senior chez Dassault Aviation | Stratégie, Programmes

Question 1 is addressing SpaceX normal work Question 2 is addressing Federal Aviation Administration adaptation to reusable launch systems Question 3 is addressing International Civil Aviation Organization that as already started to think about better integration of #AirTrafficManagement and #SpaceTrafficManagement under the pressure of EASA - European Union Aviation Safety Agency, European Space Agency - ESA, European national space agencies and International Telecommunication Union

View profile for Tommaso Sgobba

Executive Director of IAASS

MANY THINGS TO EXPLAIN ABOUT THE STARSHIP MISHAP "The FAA also confirmed in its statement that debris from the incident fell outside of designated areas. “During the event, the FAA activated a Debris Response Area and briefly slowed aircraft outside the area where space vehicle debris was falling or stopped aircraft at their departure location. Several aircraft requested to divert due to low fuel levels while holding outside impacted areas,” the agency stated. “A Debris Response Area is activated only if the space vehicle experiences an anomaly with debris falling outside of the identified closed aircraft hazard areas,” the FAA added. “It allows the FAA to direct aircraft to exit the area and prevent others from entering.” Things to explain: 1) Why did the Autonomous Flight Termination System (AFTS) (apparently) fail to trigger the controlled explosion of Starship? 2) Why do launch regulations not include extra safety features for test launches vs. operational launches? 3) Why is ICAO not involved in the investigation of space mishaps of this kind impacting the international airspace under its jurisdiction?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics