Katie Ryder’s Post

It's finaly happening! The Steam page for First Person Shouter is live. Please check it out and wishlist if it's the kind of game you think you would like. First Person Shouter lets players destroy the world using the power of their rage, activating their screams into world-altering attacks. It’s just like a normal video game, but louder. MUCH LOUDER!!! The game features six carefully crafted artisanal worlds that reflect the bespoke frustrations of the modern world. From waiting rooms to traffic jams, we have all the least favorite experiences ready for your personal destructive pleasure. Each level can be played in different ways with different rules, adding to the chaotic joy. Catharsis never felt so good. Each level also contains the hidden possessions of your sad cat, Whiskers. When you find and return those objects, he gets a little bit happier, and you can sleep easy knowing he’s doing well. First Person Shouter will change how players see games forever. So wishlist this game on Steam today and unleash all of your most creative destructive urges. Join us on Discord for more updates and notifications of our demo and early access dates. https://lnkd.in/gkm2KP-E

Here is a fun version of this game: find the minimum number of Queens, by LinkedIn you need to place before the game solves itself. You can also eliminate squares, instead of placing Queens. Once you learn the methods in the Official walkthrough, you should look to get better, by spending less time marking X's. Even better is to find one or two placements, after which the Game solves itself. A game solves itself when: 1) Auto X's are on, 2) there is always just one colour left after each move, until the game is solved. In Game 104, can you guess how many colours or squares that you need to place before the game solves itself? Surprisingly, for such a simple game, you have to place more than a single Queen before the game solves itself. I placed an X at R2C4, try to find the justification for that. As you can see the game now unravels & solves itself.

You want 100K months, but you’re playing like someone making 100K/year. That last move you made, was it really the move of the version of you making 100K/month? If you want bigger results than most, you have to play a bigger game than most. There’s no other way. You’re going to have to play a game of being misunderstood. A game where people think you’re crazy. But playing that game is your ticket to the results you say you want. I can take one look at your current results and know the type of game you’re playing. Can you? I think it’s time you play a bigger game, starting now.

My game (it’s a browser game based on the game theory and stories illustrating situations from it, probe): https://lnkd.in/e2VWh-qg

🕹 Today is Pac-Man's 44th birthday!!! 🕹 The game Pac-Man was designed by Toru Iwatani and released by the Japanese company Namco on May 22, 1980. Few fun fact about game: 🎭 Original Name: The game was originally called "Puck Man" in Japan, deriving from the Japanese word "paku," which means to chomp. However, the name was changed to "Pac-Man" for the international release to prevent potential vandalism of the arcade cabinets, such as altering the "P" to an "F." 🖼 Influence on Design: Toru Iwatani was inspired to create Pac-Man while eating pizza. The pizza with a missing slice resembled a mouth, leading to the design of the character. Iwatani also aimed to create a game that would appeal to both men and women, unlike the violent themes common in many games of that era. 👻 Iconic Characters: The ghosts in Pac-Man are named Blinky (red), Pinky (pink), Inky (cyan), and Clyde (orange). Each ghost has a unique personality and behavior pattern, making the game more complex and strategic. 🎮 Cultural Impact: Pac-Man became a cultural phenomenon in the 1980s, inspiring an animated TV series, a top-ten single ("Pac-Man Fever"), and a wide range of merchandise. 💯 Perfect Score: The maximum possible score in the original Pac-Man game is 3,333,360 points. This involves eating every dot, fruit, and ghost on all 256 levels without losing a single life. The first person to achieve this perfect score was Billy Mitchell in 1999. ✴ The Split-Screen Level: The 256th level of Pac-Man is infamous for its "split-screen" glitch. Due to a bug in the game's code, the right half of the screen becomes a jumbled mess of letters and numbers, making it impossible to complete the level.

In our game, we are seeing a behavior that truly baffles me. I'm curious if any of you have any type of explanation. Our game demo is live on Steam (https://lnkd.in/giAk9qY5). We are seeing an oddly large percentage of our players who open the game, "play" for 1 minute and then close the game. Like, this is not even enough time to hit the Play button. Can anyone suggest an explanation for why a Steam user would install a game demo, open the game, and then almost immediately close it?

Who remembers this puzzle game? This game was a true test of patience and tenacity, wasn't it? The objective of the game is pretty simple: arrange the tiles serially from the lowest to the highest number (the overconfident ones would flip that just for kicks) by sliding the tiles within the box. Achieving the objective can be HARD! You could arrange the tiles to a point, then for the sake of getting the next tile in place, you have to dismantle what you have already successfully arranged. I'll be honest... On a few occasions, I violently pulled out the tiles and forcefully snapped them into the right places instead of patiently sliding them around. ...oh the good ol' days... Anyway, looking back, I realize that productivity is all about finding the right combination of resources. I call this "The Right Stack". Each tile of the puzzle game is a valuable resource. On its own, it's not too meaningful or valuable. Randomly stacked with other resources, it is chaotic. But in The Right Stack, you hear a quiet symphony. Remember the feeling of fulfillment you get when you conquer the puzzle? Yeah...that's it. How do we find the right stack? Same way we learnt how to solve the puzzle. The more we played, the more we understood. Initially, to correct a mistake, we would mess-up the whole box of tiles...later, we realized we only needed to move 3 or 4 tiles around. So, by experience, we learn; whether ours or those of others. As a result of what I do, I enjoy a front-row seat to the experiences of my clients, I examine case studies and conduct experiments from time to time, all so that my next client can enjoy accelerated results. What other lessons can you draw from your time playing this puzzle game?

After creating the game interface, now its time to place the 'X' and 'O' marks and make the game playable. So, I create a function to place the 'X' and 'O' marks on gameboard and I used switch loop for it. In switch loop I place the co-ordinates ( e.g. x = 50; y = 85 ) of numbers ( from 1 to 9 ) which are on the gameboard for replacing the numbers into 'X' and 'I'll marks. After that, I create a function for check win condition and in this function I include total 8 conditions and whenever this condition will fulfil the winner player will be shown below the 'Winner' text and whenever the match will be drawn the 'Draw' text will be shown below the 'Winner' text. Here is the clip of game :-

Who remembers this puzzle game? This game was a true test of patience and tenacity, wasn't it? The objective of the game is pretty simple: arrange the tiles serially from the lowest to the highest number (the overconfident ones would flip that just for kicks) by sliding the tiles within the box. Achieving the objective can be HARD! You could arrange the tiles to a point, then for the sake of getting the next tile in place, you have to dismantle what you have already successfully arranged. I'll be honest... On a few occasions, I violently pulled out the tiles and forcefully snapped them into the right places instead of patiently sliding them around. ...oh the good ol' days... Anyway, looking back, I realize that productivity is all about finding the right combination of resources. I call this "The Right Stack". Each tile of the puzzle game is a valuable resource. On its own, it's not too meaningful or valuable. Randomly stacked with other resources, it is chaotic. But in The Right Stack, you hear a quiet symphony. Remember the feeling of fulfillment you get when you conquer the puzzle? Yeah...that's it. How do we find the right stack? Same way we learnt how to solve the puzzle. The more we played, the more we understood. Initially, to correct a mistake, we would mess-up the whole box of tiles...later, we realized we only needed to move 3 or 4 tiles around. So, by experience, we learn; whether ours or those of others. As a result of what I do, I enjoy a front-row seat to the experiences of my clients, I examine case studies and conduct experiments from time to time, all so that my next client can enjoy accelerated results. What other lessons can you draw from your time playing this puzzle game?