The first of two short clips extracted from a long segment today on #SquawkBox with Martin Soong on CNBC. Here, we talk U.S.-India relations under Trump, expanding U.S.-India tech collaborations under the iCET initiative, then move on to the U.S. defense industrial and technology base and the role of allies and partnerships.
Evan A. Feigenbaum’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
an opinion with an question of concern for the US and Allies ; Is the government of China showing sign of advancement, and or is testing both the US and Allies as in deceptively inch closer to once un chartered territories as in prior human history, Great Britain vs Germany in the late 19th century that led toward an collision course of world war 1, 1914 to 1918. The latest news report states clearly that there are several thousand troops stationed at the Panama Canal, an neutral territory, but close to the US in geo political terms of the distance toward the US and the southern border of the US. It is quire evident that China and US are the 21st century number one and two in economic , military, intelligence, AI, global trade, that may appear on the same path as the two great powers , Great Britain and Germany, that started in the mid 19th century, economic , military, intelligence, advanced technology at its time, mechanical, trade etc. One of the greatest challenges of humanity, 21st century, as our friend and ally, Israel , who is being challenged of their existentialism. Our prayers, support, to possibly open the way in the mid east.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
China’s plan is clear. It hopes to freeze Taiwanese politics, making Taiwan an unreliable partner for the U.S., Japan and other regional powers. The U.S. needs a clear plan in response, write Seth Cropsey & Harry Halem,
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"What U.S. officials need first is clarity about the contest with China. They have to recognize that rising tensions are inevitable in the short run if the United States is to deter war and win the contest in the long run. Once they have faced these facts, they need to put in place a better policy: one that rearms the U.S. military, reduces China’s economic leverage, and recruits a broader coalition to confront China." "Washington should not fear the end state desired by a growing number of Chinese: a China that is able to chart its own course free from communist dictatorship. Xi’s draconian rule has persuaded even many CCP members that the system that produced China’s recent precipitous decline in prosperity, status, and individual happiness is one that deserves reexamination. The system that produced an all-encompassing surveillance state, forced-labor colonies, and the genocide of minority groups inside its borders is one that likewise desecrates Chinese philosophy and religion—the fountainheads from which a better model will eventually spring."
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Adaptation is crucial for any nation to thrive in a changing global landscape. Understanding and responding to China's rise is indeed a significant aspect of this. It involves strategic diplomacy, economic adjustments, and technological innovation to maintain competitiveness.
"What U.S. officials need first is clarity about the contest with China. They have to recognize that rising tensions are inevitable in the short run if the United States is to deter war and win the contest in the long run. Once they have faced these facts, they need to put in place a better policy: one that rearms the U.S. military, reduces China’s economic leverage, and recruits a broader coalition to confront China." "Washington should not fear the end state desired by a growing number of Chinese: a China that is able to chart its own course free from communist dictatorship. Xi’s draconian rule has persuaded even many CCP members that the system that produced China’s recent precipitous decline in prosperity, status, and individual happiness is one that deserves reexamination. The system that produced an all-encompassing surveillance state, forced-labor colonies, and the genocide of minority groups inside its borders is one that likewise desecrates Chinese philosophy and religion—the fountainheads from which a better model will eventually spring."
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Eyes on China The 118th Congress has worked to bring greater awareness to the threat that the Chinese Communist Party poses to the United States. We hope to see the next 119th Congress do the same. This week, the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party released a factsheet detailing how American capital is being sent to China and fueling their military expansion and human rights abuses. Outbound investments is a critical policy area that requires greater oversight. Careless investments can inadvertently fund Chinese Communist military operations intended to target the United States or our allies. Technologies, like semiconductors and artificial intelligence, can give China a distinct tactical advantage over the United States if they are able to develop them at a faster rate. We should make sure American dollars aren’t being used to undermine our national security. American investments have also been funneled into China’s ongoing genocide of their Uyghur population and Xi Jinping’s propaganda. Thank you for your dedication to defending freedom and liberty for the future generations. Ryan and the Heritage Action team
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Provided some comments to The Wall Street Journal on the resumption of mil-to-mil communications between China and the U.S., via Chun Han Wong. on the 'why now?' question. What's driving this? "For Beijing, improving communication with the Pentagon means one less thing to worry about when faced with challenges such as tepid economic growth at home and mounting trade pressures from abroad, said Dylan Loh, an assistant professor at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University who studies China’s foreign policy. Resuming military-to-military ties is a low-hanging fruit that does not cost China much, bearing in mind that the absence of such dialogue was actually an aberration not the norm,” Loh said. At the same time, “Beijing sees the risks in not having channels of communication at the military-to-military level,” such as misunderstandings over each other’s intentions in moments of confrontation or crisis, he said." 👇 https://lnkd.in/ghjPYjjm?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Quad is easy - there are 4 parties. And they can pretend to get along because they are not next to each other; and have a common geopolitical rival. (Except Australia, not clear why they should get involved unless they need protection from Indonesia AND China) They can meet and not agree. Or not meet, because they are in the forming stage - and without an external trigger they will not get to the storming stage. US will supply/not supply AUS with nuke subs irrespective of AUS being in the Quad (separate treaty); USN will treat India as the largest nation in the Indian Ocean and the second most powerful military force. It is not clear what Japan wants from India or Australia - but it is clear that Japan is willing to partner up with the US on Taiwan and SCS. The Quad has a common concern China - and a common anchor US. Beyond that I find it hard to uncover what they can do to find commonality to move forward to an Asian NATO.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🇨🇳CHINA IS READY FOR TRUMP 2.0. Beijing isn’t losing sleep over Trump’s comeback—it's preparing to leverage the moment. Chinese experts see rocky US-China ties ahead but believe lessons from Trump’s first term have strengthened their strategy. Trump's “America First” policies could weaken U.S. alliances, giving China more room to maneuver globally. A divided West is a win for Beijing. China's focus? Domestic reforms to close the gap with the U.S. while avoiding a direct military clash. China knows the game: outlast the noise and play the long-term strategy. Source: myNews
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Some thoughts in this #BusinessStandard story on Trump and the Quad. Trump’s aggressive anti-China rhetoric and preference for military posturing risks shifting the Quad’s balance towards overt militarisation.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Navigating Uncertainty: China's Perspective on Trump's Potential Second Term #Comments: China is largely unfazed by Trump's potential return to the White House, having learned from his first term. While his protectionist policies may lead to tensions, Beijing believes it can manage confrontations. The unpredictability of U.S. alliances under Trump might push other nations to strengthen ties with China. Despite worries about military clashes, the ideological battle won't mirror the Cold War, as Trump lacks deep ideological commitments. His administration is expected to focus on economic protectionism and military pressure, potentially escalating the trade war. However, Trump's disinterest in ideological conflicts may allow for a pragmatic approach to U.S.-China relations. As he aims for domestic reforms, he may avoid entanglements in Taiwan or military conflicts. The competition will center on technology rather than ideology, with both powers focused on innovation and market influence. Ultimately, the outcome will depend on how effectively both China and Trump address their domestic challenges in the coming years. #China #Trump #US_Chaina_Relations #GlobalPolitics https://lnkd.in/gU6tvD-X
To view or add a comment, sign in