aeShield®’s Post

Redefining Safety: Simplifying Critical Instrument Testing with aeShield’s On-Demand SIL Calculation Engine In the realm of process / functional safety, ensuring the reliability of safety instrumented systems (SIS) is paramount. IEC 61511 sets the standards for assessing and managing these systems, particularly when it comes to determining the need for critical instrument testing. At aeShield, we recognize the complexities involved in these decisions and this is why we have created an On-Demand SIL Calculation Engine, which redefines and simplifies the testing deferral decision making process. The Challenge of Critical Instrument Testing Critical instrument testing is essential for maintaining the integrity and reliability of safety systems. However, the traditional approach can often be cumbersome and time-consuming. Many organizations struggle with deciding whether it is safe to defer testing, weighing the risks against operational demands. This can lead to confusion, compliance issues, and, ultimately, increased risk to safety. Introducing the On-Demand SIL Calculation Engine Our On-Demand SIL Calculation Engine is designed to streamline this process. By integrating sophisticated algorithms with user-friendly functionality, aeShield empowers organizations to make informed decisions quickly and effectively. Key Features: Real-Time Calculations: The engine provides instant SIL calculations based on real-time data inputs, allowing users to assess the safety integrity level of their systems without delay. User-Friendly Interface: With an intuitive design, users can easily input data and receive comprehensive reports, minimizing the need for extensive training or technical expertise. Compliance with IEC 61511: The engine is fully aligned with IEC 61511 requirements, ensuring that your assessments meet industry standards and regulatory obligations. Risk-Based Decision Making: By evaluating the probability of failure and the consequences of deferred testing, our engine helps organizations assess risks accurately, allowing for informed decision-making. Documentation and Reporting: Automatically generate documentation and reports for audits, facilitating easier compliance management and record-keeping. Simplifying Decision-Making With aeShield’s On-Demand SIL Calculation Engine, organizations can confidently assess whether it is safe to defer critical instrument testing. The tool not only simplifies calculations but also enhances clarity in decision-making, enabling safety professionals to focus on what matters most—protecting people and the environment. Ready to transform your approach to critical instrument testing? Explore how aeShield can support your safety initiatives today! For more information, visit our website or contact us at https://lnkd.in/e4X9E_xU

Common Mistakes When Flushing a Lube Oil System Prior to Filling in the Oil and Gas Industry Properly flushing a lube oil system is crucial for removing contaminants and ensuring optimal equipment performance. However, several common mistakes can compromise the effectiveness of the flushing process. Here are some critical errors to avoid: * Inadequate Planning and Preparation: 🥛* Insufficient flushing fluid: Using insufficient flushing fluid can leave behind contaminants and compromise the effectiveness of the flush. 💉* Lack of proper flushing equipment: Using inadequate flushing pumps, filters, or hoses can hinder the removal of contaminants. * Incorrect Flushing Procedures: ⏳* Insufficient flushing time: Not allowing sufficient time for the flushing fluid to circulate through the system can leave behind residual contaminants. 💯* Incorrect flow rates: Using incorrect flow rates can reduce the effectiveness of the flushing process and potentially damage system components. * Contamination During Flushing: 🥃 * Contamination from flushing fluid: Using contaminated flushing fluid can introduce new contaminants into the system. ⚠️* Contamination from the environment: Exposure to dust, debris, or other contaminants during the flushing process can compromise the cleanliness of the system. * Inadequate Filtration: 🪨 * Using incorrect filters: Using filters with inadequate filtration capacity can allow contaminants to pass through and re-enter the system. 🔧* Insufficient filter maintenance: Not regularly inspecting and changing filters during the flushing process can reduce their effectiveness. * Post-Flushing Procedures: 💦 * Insufficient drying: Not adequately drying the system before filling with new oil can lead to the entrapment of moisture, which can cause corrosion and equipment damage. 📝* Improper filling procedures: Not following proper filling procedures, such as de-aeration and venting, can introduce air into the system, leading to cavitation and reduced lubrication effectiveness. By addressing these critical issues, you can ensure a thorough and effective lube oil system flush, leading to: * Improved equipment reliability * Reduced maintenance costs * Increased production efficiency * Enhanced equipment lifespan P.S. For in-depth technical guidance on lube oil system flushing best practices, explore the resources available at Sixfold Group. [Link to Sixfoldgroup.com] Let's discuss! What are your biggest challenges when it comes to flushing lube oil systems in your projects? Share your experiences in the comments! #oilgas #lubeoil #flushing #maintenance #engineering #equipmentreliability

Good article with introduction to inherent safety, common risk identification techniques and a case study on missing a relief load scenario for high pressure separation gas blowby to a low pressure separator leading to the fatal accident in BP ‘s Grangemouth refinery. Good and solemn reminder to all designers out there.

📐 Precision Matters in Engineering Design Reviews At #SmithandBurgess, we understand that even small design flaws can lead to significant challenges in oil and gas projects. That’s why our Engineering Design Reviews go beyond surface-level checks—we dive deep into technical details to identify potential issues, from relief system designs to facility layouts. Our team of seasoned engineers ensures your project is: ✅ Aligned with engineering best practices ✅ Compliant with industry standards ✅ Optimized for performance and safety Let’s set your project up for success. Learn more: smithburgess.com #ProcessSafety #EngineeringExcellence #OilAndGas #EngineeringDesignReviews

Pipeline incidents have cost the U.S. approximately $11 billion over the past 20 years, according to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). In an effort to improve safety, the agency’s new code requirements went into effect in February 2024. Now, pipeline operators must be prepared to respond to dents and damage with increased rigor. Learn how Exponent’s approach to engineering critical assessments (ECAs) adapts compliant procedures and protocols to the specific context of a pipeline, helping operators identify critical challenges and mitigation measures — while ensuring efficiency: https://hubs.li/Q02wZg-g0 Yash Bhargava, Alex Hudgins, Brett Davis #Exponent #IndustryAnalysis #Pipelines #PipelineIntegrity #OilAndGas #Energy #Utilities #UtilityManagement #UtilitiesSafety #RiskAssessment #RiskSafety

What are the requirements of Functional Safety Assessment? In IEC 61511, the aim of a Functional Safety Assessment (FSA) is to ensure that the Safety Integrity Level has been achieved. FSA should be carried out by someone not involved with the execution or verification of the task. It's a clear defined number of stages within the life-cycle of a SIS that these should take place: FSA 1; this is carried out once the Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) study, Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) and the Safety Requirement Specification (SRS) is written. It is carried out before the SIS Design is executed based on the SRS. Typically it's carried out at each lifecycle phase rather than waiting for the SRS to be published. This is due to the fact that in practice, the time between the initial hazard studies and the development of the SRS could be significant and it may not be practicable to reconvene the Hazard Operability (HazOp) team. FSA 2 is carried out once the SIS Design & Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) have been completed. This ensures that the SIS Design has been executed as per the SRS and the FAT has correctly validated the requirements listed in the SRS. FSA 3 is carried out following the construction, pre-commissioning & final validation as part of the new SIS. This demonstrates to Operations & Maintenance (O&M) that the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) has been achieved. It aims to provide the O&M team with evidence that this new SIS has been tested to the requirements in 61511. A typical finding from FSA 3 could be that the Sequence of Events (SOE) have not been extracted from the site's Process Control Network (PCN) to demonstrate evidence of a Safety Instrumented Function's (SIF) performance. FSA 4 is executed at defined intervals through the O&M phase to ensure the continued integrity and ability for the SIS to perform upon demand. The frequency is not prescribed or defined in 61511 but a site must be able demonstrate that they examine their approach to proof testing, inspection and SIS performance analysis. Demand tracking of SIFs and reporting of component failures, as opposed to just rectifying the fault, would be good practices to be followed & looked for during this stage. Finally, FSA 5 is required when modifications are carried out to a SIS. Typically carried out in two parts, the first is concerned with the Management of Change (MoC)- essentially risk assessing the change and ensuring all relevant Subject Matter Experts (SME's) have been consulted. The second ensures whether the modification of the SIS was executed correctly. The lack of end-to-end proof testing on an online facility or mitigation when unable to do so is a typical finding of this stage. RedSky Energy have vast experience within the organisation to facilitate Functional Safety Assessments within your concession. Don't hesitate to reach out to our team who will provide a comprehensive approach to your requirements. info@redskyenergy.co.uk www.redskyenergy.co.uk

#safetyfirst #safetyalways I always remember one of my mentors approaching an installation engineer whilst he was trying to lift something in an unorthodox manner. He asked him (with a smile), "I just saw you try to lift that - is that the safest way to do it?" The engineer thought a little...and quickly came up with a safer solution. For me this kind of calm, reverse questioning is a great approach to reinforce a positive safety culture - which if done right - can perpetuate throughout all trades until project completion. It also makes us better engineers by being made aware of a problem with the onus on us to solve it. 'Risk perception is significantly shaped by personal experience'. ►Don't be a policeman. ►Share your experience with others. ►Coach and nurture in a positive way. ►Lead by example. Every facility engineer should have 'safety' as part of his/her arsenal. Learn more about Biyat Energy & Environment Ltd's safety prowess via our Knowledge Hub - 'Preventing accidents during construction' and 'eye on safety - construction success story'. https://lnkd.in/dnPDrPWc #designoutrisk #hierachyofcontrol #safetymanagement #projectmanagement #facilityengineering #advancedmanufacturing

COLD GRINDING APPLICATION GUIDE One of the most helpful ways to decide on a great solution is to have a guide on how and where to use Safety Tools. This Application Guide help you pick the right parts for where you hope to use it, their surface finish profile as well as the predicted life in terms of number of repair spots, helping you be clear on you return on investment. It also has a full set of links to videos of each tool in use. A fantastic guide for you and your team GET YOUR COPY OF THE APPLICATION GUIDE https://bit.ly/3mjOcN5 Not Sure - Look what users have to say : “I never imagined in my life time that I would be able to perform the type of work that involves removing steel on an Offshore producing platform without throwing any sparks. These tools have allowed us to take construction to a new era in Safety.” Charles Munoz, GIS Project management Group –Gulf of Mexico, MAD DOG Offshore Platform – Chevron “This technology will also be very important for safety in refineries and just about anywhere else with EX potential. It offers a possibility of doing these jobs with no shutdown or slowdown in production and increased safety for workers and infrastructure.” Claudio Paschoa – Petrobras, Maintenance Engineer “The noise level from Safety Tools’ cutting wheel is so low that I am able to carry out a normal conversation, while cutting through a 4-inch pipe.” Arne Veland, HSEQ Manager, Seawell Engineering

Common Mistakes When Filling a Lube Oil System in the Oil and Gas Industry Properly filling a lube oil system is crucial for ensuring optimal equipment performance and longevity. However, several common mistakes can compromise the effectiveness of the filling process. Here are some critical errors to avoid: * Incorrect Oil Selection: 🛢️* Using the wrong oil: Using oil with the wrong viscosity, additives, or compatibility can lead to poor lubrication, equipment damage, and reduced service life. ☠️* Using contaminated oil: Using contaminated oil can introduce contaminants into the system, leading to increased wear, equipment damage, and reduced oil life. * Improper Filling Procedures: 💨* Air entrapment: Introducing air into the system during filling can lead to cavitation, foaming, and reduced lubrication effectiveness. ⛽️* Overfilling or underfilling: Overfilling can lead to excessive pressure and seal leakage, while underfilling can result in insufficient lubrication and equipment damage. * Contamination During Filling: ☠️ * Contamination from the environment: Exposure to dust, debris, or other contaminants during the filling process can compromise the cleanliness of the system. 🔨 * Contamination from filling equipment: Using contaminated filling equipment, such as hoses or pumps, can introduce contaminants into the system. * Lack of System Purging: 🤦♀️* Insufficient purging: Not adequately purging the system of air and contaminants before filling can lead to reduced oil life and equipment damage. 🗂️* Improper purging techniques: Using incorrect purging techniques can leave behind residual air or contaminants. * Post-Filling Procedures: ⚙️* Inadequate system checks: Not performing necessary post-filling checks, such as oil level checks and system pressure checks, can lead to undetected problems. 👾* Insufficient system conditioning: Not allowing sufficient time for the oil to circulate and condition the system can lead to suboptimal performance. By addressing these critical issues, you can ensure a proper and effective lube oil system fill, leading to: * Improved equipment reliability * Reduced maintenance costs * Increased production efficiency * Enhanced equipment lifespan P.S. For in-depth technical guidance on lube oil system filling best practices, explore the resources available at Sixfold Group. [Link to Sixfoldgroup.com] Let's discuss! What are your biggest challenges when it comes to filling lube oil systems in your projects? Share your experiences in the comments! #oilgas #lubeoil #filling #maintenance #engineering #equipmentreliability

The concept of Safe Limits can be illustrated using the process flow example shown in the sketch. Liquid is pumped from an atmospheric storage tank, T-100, to a pressure vessel, V-101. The liquid, which is both flammable and toxic, is called Raw Material Number 12 ― abbreviated to RM-12. There are two pumps, Pump P-101A and P-101B, either of which can handle the full flow.(A is normally in service, with B being on standby). The pumps are driven by a steam turbine and an electric motor respectively. The flow of liquid both into and out of T-100 is continuous. The incoming flow varies according to upstream conditions and is outside the control of the operators responsible for the equipment shown. The flow rate from T-100 to V-101 is controlled by FRC-101, whose set point is cascaded from LRC-101, which measures the level in T-100. The level in T-100 can also be measured with the sight glass, LI-100. V-101 is protected against over-pressure by safety instrumentation (not shown) that shuts down both P-101 A/B, and by the relief valve, PSV-101.