What code review tools provide the most comprehensive bug tracking features?

Some of the prominent code review tools that provide comprehensive bug tracking features are: -GitHub: It is a widely used platform for version control and collaborations. Developers can create issues directly from pr, linking code changes to specific bugs -GitLab provides built in issue tracking capabilities and integrates with bug tracking systems like Jira -Bitbucket offers Git and mercurial code management. -Phabricator is an open source suite of development tools that includes code review, bug tracking -Review Board is an open source code review tool that supports integration with bug tracking systems like Jira -Upsource by JetBrains is a code review and repository browsing tool that supports integration with issue tracking systems.

Why is this important? It implies that the purpose of code rereview is to find bugs. I disagree, if the person who wrote the code and spent a lot of time did not find the bugs then the reviewer who spends less time will probably not. The purpose of code review is to trigger the pride factor in the writer and force the review to read the code, since they might have to modify it later. Trying to find bugs during code review is a waste of time, that is what tests are for. Any bugs found are a bonus.

For comprehensive bug tracking, tools like Jira, Bugzilla, and BrowserStack stand out. Jira offers robust project management and bug tracking, ideal for Agile teams. Bugzilla is known for its detailed issue tracking system. BrowserStack provides real-time browser testing with bug tracking. These tools offer extensive integrations, making them invaluable for maintaining high-quality software development.

When you review code, it’s crucial to find bugs accurately and quickly. Detailed code review tools help with this by pointing out mistakes in the code.

A bug is any deviation from the expected results. This should raise a problem report which can then be triaged. You then need to verify if its an incorrectly executed test, a bug in the test or an actual issue with the system under test. It's normal for all tests to be executed several times to catch possible inconsistencies. so if a test consistently fails the first point is to verify that all of the prerequisite steps have been executed correctly and that the test is correctly interpreting the requirements. If this is all correct then the issue would be escalated.

A good bug tracking system in a code review tool helps keep track of issues in the software. It lets you organize bugs by importance, assign them to team members, and set deadlines. You can see where each bug is in the fixing process. It's easy to find specific bugs using filters and search. You can discuss bugs with your team and attach files. It works well with other tools like Git. Plus, it provides reports to help you improve your development process. Overall, it helps teams manage and fix bugs efficiently, making for better software.

Once we have identified the issue now it's time to fix it, but there can be a lot of processing to and fro during fixing the issue. So, we need a proper tracking system to track all the changes we are doing, that will include having subtasks for implementation, testing, documentation etc. All should be properly tracked man managed.

When you work on an enterprise level application, you are not the only developer working on it. There will be a number of developers working on the same product and same or different modules. So it becomes crucial to have bug tracking system with collaborative features. That will help team members discuss, comment on code reviews and collaborate.

Reporting and Analytics plays an important role in this aspects. Detailed reports on bug types and frequencies pinpoint recurring issues in the codebase. This allows teams to proactively address these bottlenecks and prevent future regressions.