How can you choose between message passing and shared memory for interprocess communication?

1 Message passing

Message passing is the method of IPC where processes send and receive messages to each other through a communication channel. These messages can be fixed or variable in size, and can contain data, commands, or signals. The communication channel can be synchronous or asynchronous, and can use various protocols and mechanisms such as pipes, sockets, queues, or remote procedure calls. This method of IPC is suitable for distributed systems, where processes are located on different machines, and for loosely coupled systems where processes are independent and do not share any resources.

Message passing has some advantages, such as avoiding data inconsistency and race conditions that can occur with shared memory. It also allows processes to communicate across different platforms and networks, as long as they agree on the message format and protocol. Furthermore, it provides a high level of abstraction and modularity as processes only need to know the interface of the communication channel. On the other hand, message passing has some disadvantages as well. It can incur a high overhead of message encoding, decoding, and transmission for large or complex messages. Additionally, it can be difficult to implement reliable and secure communication channels for distributed systems that may face network failures, delays, or attacks. Lastly, designing and maintaining the message format and protocol may be challenging for systems that evolve over time or have multiple versions.

2 Shared memory

Shared memory is a method of IPC where processes access a common region of memory that is mapped to their address space. This type of memory can be used to store data, flags, or semaphores and processes can read and write to it directly, without using any communication channel. Shared memory is suitable for systems that run on the same machine, or for tightly coupled systems that need to share a large amount of data or synchronize their actions frequently. It offers several advantages, such as providing a fast and efficient way of data transfer, allowing processes to use the same data structures and formats, and offering a low level of abstraction and flexibility. However, it also has some disadvantages, such as causing data inconsistency and race conditions if processes do not coordinate properly, limiting scalability and portability, and increasing complexity and risk.

3 How to choose

Choosing between message passing and shared memory for IPC is not a straightforward decision, as it depends on various factors such as the system's requirements, the capabilities of the environment, and the preferences and skills of the developers. However, some general guidelines can help you make a better choice. Message passing should be used if communication needs to be done across different machines or platforms or if data inconsistency or race conditions need to be avoided. Shared memory should be used when communication is happening on the same machine or when high speed and efficiency of data transfer are desired. It is important to consider the trade-offs between advantages and disadvantages of each method as well as the complexity and simplicity of implementation and maintenance. Experimenting with different methods and comparing results can also help you decide which method is best for your scenario. IPC is a complex area of computer science, but by understanding the pros and cons of message passing and shared memory and following some general guidelines, you can make an informed decision about your IPC design.

4 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?