This is a page from the Cascading Style Sheets Working Group Blog. Some other places to find information are the “current work” page, the www-style mailing list, and the Future of CSS syndicator.
Do you want to know how the CSS WG works? Fantasai has written about:csswg, An Inside View of the CSS Working Group at W3C.
continue
property for region-fragment
received the most attention for bikeshedding. One issue with continue
is that it is a verb when almost all property names have been nouns or adjectives. Some people were inclined to return the name to fragmentation
but most of the group felt that would have no context outside of the working group. It was suggested that there was likely vocabulary for this concept and that users of programs like inDesign or PhotoShop would likely have some suggestions.region-fragment
properties defined outside the overflow context. It was agreed thought they are similar, they’re not the same and therefore should be separate.all
isn’t viewed as particularly accessible since it removes the :focus
outline on an element. Consensus was the old default
that was removed from the spec would fix the problem. The spec authors will go back and see if there are any reasons that default
was removed that need to be addressed and re-introduce next week for formal resolution..cur
and .ico
to the web consortium..cur
and .ico
are the standards and they will be expected in new products. It’s an informative note. It will be up to the person writing the note as to what exactly goes inside.image
CSS value, as well as SVG if the implementation supports SVG and saying for cursor that all non animated formats supported for image
MUST be supported in cursor, and that all animated formats supported in image
SHOULD be supported in cursor. However, Microsoft asked for a week to review, so formal resolution will be asked for on next week’s call.trailing-spaces
will be in CSS Text Level 4